Jump to content

vs. PHILLIES, 8/12


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Yikes, don't like this. Don't know why it's Givens here. 

Hyde is about the W rule.  That's why you don't see Akin getting any action.  Doesn't trust the rookie. 

Although that doesn't really reconcile with him trotting Davis out there everyday for 4-5 automatic outs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ump Tiers

Great: Consistently adhere to what the actual strike zone is.

Good: Has a modified strike zone (not adhering strictly to the regulation), but he calls it consistently and accurately the same way for the whole game, and his zone is very similar to most other umps in the league right now.

Average: Has a modified strike zone, he calls it consistently and accurately, but his zone is a bit unique to this specific umpire.

Bad: Has a modified zone, calls it inconsistently (the same pitch is a ball or strike variously), but at least it seems to mostly be similar to other umps in the league.

Awful: Has a modified zone, calls it inconsistently, and it's totally different than other umps or nowhere near what the regulation calls for.

I've seen a lot of average and bad this year. Tonight's might be awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SilverRocket said:

Should we really be burning through pitchers when we used so many yesterday?

Tight game. Sorta don't have a choice. And a lot of these guys will be available tomorrow.

Friday is looking a little grim if they don't make a roster move. Gonna need some innings by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, allquixotic said:

Ump Tiers

Great: Consistently adhere to what the actual strike zone is.

Good: Has a modified strike zone (not adhering strictly to the regulation), but he calls it consistently and accurately the same way for the whole game, and his zone is very similar to most other umps in the league right now.

Average: Has a modified strike zone, he calls it consistently and accurately, but his zone is a bit unique to this specific umpire.

Bad: Has a modified zone, calls it inconsistently (the same pitch is a ball or strike variously), but at least it seems to mostly be similar to other umps in the league.

Awful: Has a modified zone, calls it inconsistently, and it's totally different than other umps or nowhere near what the regulation calls for.

I've seen a lot of average and bad this year. Tonight's might be awful.

Even when the ump made the right call on a 3rd strike to the Philly batter, he didn't even say strike 3 when he rung him up.  Either that or he got drowned out by the crowd... nah.  Last night was bad.  Tonight is truly awful.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
    • Povich is off vs Detroit at least. Even if they carry a 9 man pen, Doubt that 5 will be left handers
    • I hate to say it because they are all eligible to succeed or fail ( DC just coming back ), would probally go with Soto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...