Jump to content

No more argument to play Chris Davis


accinfo

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Crazy, years ago, they argue over who was going to be the first "million" dollar baseman man.

Now look at the money they are making.

BTW, nice work there.

Nolan Ryan was the first million dollar salary in 1980. $1M then is worth a little over $3M today. They've slightly outpaced inflation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, makoman said:

Nolan Ryan was the first million dollar salary in 1980. $1M then is worth a little over $3M today. They've slightly outpaced inflation.

Ryan quadrupled his salary with that deal.

I remember well, the uproar from the older generation, that it would ruin baseball. Clearly, they was wrong.
600K of 1960 dollars is worth 5.2 million today. I would have to think it outpaced inflation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

No, but adding strength when you already have the ability to hit will help for sure, and it's why guys went from good average hitters with limited power to good average hitters with massive power numbers during the steroid era. Also, it's clear that steroids allowed pitchers to throw harder.

“When you already have the ability to hit” is the key part of your statement, especially as it (doesn’t) relate to Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • weams locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I have a feeling we’ll see a lot of the starters pulled mid-game.  
    • I usually post the lyrics of Paul Simon’s Night Game on the last day of the season, but it doesn’t really fit for a team going to the playoffs.   So I’ll wait, and hopefully never have occasion to post it.   
    • Yea I didn’t get this either. 
    • Why pitch Suarez today instead of yesterday?   That makes no sense to me.  
    • Please don’t compare OAA and dWAR.  OAA and dWAR are not comparable stats.  First of all, OAA is measured in outs, while dWAR is measured in wins.   That’s a very different scale.   Second, OAA is not adjusting for difficulty of position, while dWAR contains a significant adjustment for position.   Third, OAA measures range but doesn’t measure the throwing aspect of being an outfielder.   If you want to compare apples to apples (and I assume you do), Statcast has a statistic called Fielding Runs Value that converts OAA plus the throwing aspect into runs.   Cowser has a +10 FRV, which as the names implies, is measured in runs.  FRV feeds directly into the fWAR calculation, along with a factor that adjusts for difficulty of position, which for Cowser is measured at -4.1 runs.   Meanwhile, rWAR uses Defensive Runs Saved (DRS), which is directly comparable to FRV.  Cowser has a +3 DRS, not as good as his +10 FRV.   Those are the comparable stats, and the 7 run difference converts to about 0.7 WAR. That’s the main difference between Cowser’s 4.1 fWAR and 3.2 rWAR. I see that after Gil’s poor performance yesterday, Cowser now leads him in both rWAR (3.2 to 3.1) and fWAR (4.1 to 2.2).   So, I like Cowser’s chances.      
    • I'm the opposite.  I don't want him sitting too much and getting into his own head.
    • Our key players aren't ready to uphold their part of the deal yet, but the Peak Orioles Teams sometime this decade against these Dodgers before they get too old would be an amazing matchup.      I've only gotten to watch most of a Dodgers game the past week or so, and one of the impressions even though they are HOF and still near the very best is that Freddie and Mookie are fraying some as time continues its unbeaten streak. I think we're the likeliest club of any of the 29 others to be able to out-talent the Dodgers anytime soon.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...