Jump to content

Who’s your favorite enemy?


HowAboutThat

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Angels still have the worst record in the AL.  Just proving that baseball is the ultimate team sport.

Are there other sports remotely comparable to baseball in that sense?  Are there superstar football players who basically never played in the postseason? The 1930 Yankees had seven Hall of Famers in their primes, including Ruth and Gehrig, and finished 16 games out of first.  The Cubs of Banks, Santo, Billy Williams, didn't just not make the postseason, most of the time they didn't even contend.  I love it when a complete underdog takes down a $200M team, like in 2012, but sometimes you get the feeling everything is just kind of random.

Oh, and as for the original question I don't like any Yanks or Red Sox until they've retired or gone to other organizations.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Are there other sports remotely comparable to baseball in that sense?  Are there superstar football players who basically never played in the postseason? The 1930 Yankees had seven Hall of Famers in their primes, including Ruth and Gehrig, and finished 16 games out of first.  The Cubs of Banks, Santo, Billy Williams, didn't just not make the postseason, most of the time they didn't even contend.  I love it when a complete underdog takes down a $200M team, like in 2012, but sometimes you get the feeling everything is just kind of random.

Oh, and as for the original question I don't like any Yanks or Red Sox until they've retired or gone to other organizations.

Baseball is the truest team sport. The best pitcher whoever lived can only pitch, The best hitter ever only comes to plate once in nine, the best centerfielder ever can only play one position. And it’s not just the nine on the field, it’s the organization being able to plug-in other capable replacements when the inevitable injury happens.
That is why I am happy with Mike, and reluctant to complain about his moves. He’s doing his best to remake every aspect of the organization, and that is really a big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Philip said:

Baseball is the truest team sport. The best pitcher whoever lived can only pitch, The best hitter ever only comes to plate once in nine, the best centerfielder ever can only play one position. And it’s not just the nine on the field, it’s the organization being able to plug-in other capable replacements when the inevitable injury happens.
That is why I am happy with Mike, and reluctant to complain about his moves. He’s doing his best to remake every aspect of the organization, and that is really a big deal.

I agree with everything you wrote, after your first sentence.

I could make a strong case, about football being a true team sport. The Qb depends on his OL to give the WRs time to get down the field, especially his guys on his blind side.

The intended target needs the other targets to act well and draw some defenders their way. Running backs depend on guys blocking and opening up holes for yardage.

You can talk defense schemes and its all teamwork there too.

3rd and long, and you depend on your nickel or dime package to defend against the pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Are there other sports remotely comparable to baseball in that sense?  Are there superstar football players who basically never played in the postseason? The 1930 Yankees had seven Hall of Famers in their primes, including Ruth and Gehrig, and finished 16 games out of first.  The Cubs of Banks, Santo, Billy Williams, didn't just not make the postseason, most of the time they didn't even contend.  I love it when a complete underdog takes down a $200M team, like in 2012, but sometimes you get the feeling everything is just kind of random.

Oh, and as for the original question I don't like any Yanks or Red Sox until they've retired or gone to other organizations.

Barry Sanders played in two playoff games, both in 1991.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I agree with everything you wrote, after your first sentence.

I could make a strong case, about football being a true team sport. The Qb depends on his OL to give the WRs time to get down the field, especially his guys on his blind side.

The intended target needs the other targets to act well and draw some defenders their way. Running backs depend on guys blocking and opening up holes for yardage.

You can talk defense schemes and its all teamwork there too.

3rd and long, and you depend on your nickel or dime package to defend against the pass.

Yes that is completely true, and in many ways George carlin is right when he compared the football to the military, but a great quarterback adapts to the limitations of his team. He has terrible wide receivers, so he runs, and vice versa. If he has a bad defensive line, he works on being very fast, and so on. The point is that he can- to an extent- compensate for the weaknesses of his team, But in baseball the only way to upgrade leftfield is to get another left fielder.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

Baseball is the truest team sport. The best pitcher whoever lived can only pitch, The best hitter ever only comes to plate once in nine, the best centerfielder ever can only play one position. And it’s not just the nine on the field, it’s the organization being able to plug-in other capable replacements when the inevitable injury happens.
That is why I am happy with Mike, and reluctant to complain about his moves. He’s doing his best to remake every aspect of the organization, and that is really a big deal.

It's a blessing and a curse.  It's hard to sell people on getting really invested in big players and big personalities and watching all the time when even the best players don't guarantee your team is any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's a blessing and a curse.  It's hard to sell people on getting really invested in big players and big personalities and watching all the time when even the best players don't guarantee your team is any good.

I really think baseball is more about the team than about the individual players. The individual players all come and go, but the team remains the same.

I miss Manny and Nate Mclouth and Caleb But the team is the team and I watch the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sorry, don't know how what I looked up said different.

 

No problem. I know he got tired of never winning anything. I was at his his last game. Meaningless game in Baltimore to end the 98 season. Of course nobody knew it at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Philip said:

Yes that is completely true, and in many ways George carlin is right when he compared the football to the military, but a great quarterback adapts to the limitations of his team. He has terrible wide receivers, so he runs, and vice versa. If he has a bad defensive line, he works on being very fast, and so on. The point is that he can- to an extent- compensate for the weaknesses of his team, But in baseball the only way to upgrade leftfield is to get another left fielder.

is your RB is weak, then you replace him, if your kicker cant kick worth a crap, then you replace him.

Bradshaw was a decent but not great QB, he had fantastic people around him, and they won 5 SBs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Redskins Rick said:

is your RB is weak, then you replace him, if your kicker cant kick worth a crap, then you replace him.

Bradshaw was a decent but not great QB, he had fantastic people around him, and they won 5 SBs.

 

Yeah, I don't really get the point of their argument. All of the team sports are extensively influenced by the team. Even in basketball, which I think is regarded as the most superstar-centric of them all, Jordan won nothing until he got better teammates, same with LeBron. The NFL is incredibly team reliant. I don't get why we have to try and elevate baseball as somehow different. In fact, I think the starting pitcher probably has the most influence of any individual in sports over the outcome of a single game, the only problem is you can't use him every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I have a feeling we’ll see a lot of the starters pulled mid-game.  
    • I usually post the lyrics of Paul Simon’s Night Game on the last day of the season, but it doesn’t really fit for a team going to the playoffs.   So I’ll wait, and hopefully never have occasion to post it.   
    • Yea I didn’t get this either. 
    • Why pitch Suarez today instead of yesterday?   That makes no sense to me.  
    • Please don’t compare OAA and dWAR.  OAA and dWAR are not comparable stats.  First of all, OAA is measured in outs, while dWAR is measured in wins.   That’s a very different scale.   Second, OAA is not adjusting for difficulty of position, while dWAR contains a significant adjustment for position.   Third, OAA measures range but doesn’t measure the throwing aspect of being an outfielder.   If you want to compare apples to apples (and I assume you do), Statcast has a statistic called Fielding Runs Value that converts OAA plus the throwing aspect into runs.   Cowser has a +10 FRV, which as the names implies, is measured in runs.  FRV feeds directly into the fWAR calculation, along with a factor that adjusts for difficulty of position, which for Cowser is measured at -4.1 runs.   Meanwhile, rWAR uses Defensive Runs Saved (DRS), which is directly comparable to FRV.  Cowser has a +3 DRS, not as good as his +10 FRV.   Those are the comparable stats, and the 7 run difference converts to about 0.7 WAR. That’s the main difference between Cowser’s 4.1 fWAR and 3.2 rWAR. I see that after Gil’s poor performance yesterday, Cowser now leads him in both rWAR (3.2 to 3.1) and fWAR (4.1 to 2.2).   So, I like Cowser’s chances.      
    • I'm the opposite.  I don't want him sitting too much and getting into his own head.
    • Our key players aren't ready to uphold their part of the deal yet, but the Peak Orioles Teams sometime this decade against these Dodgers before they get too old would be an amazing matchup.      I've only gotten to watch most of a Dodgers game the past week or so, and one of the impressions even though they are HOF and still near the very best is that Freddie and Mookie are fraying some as time continues its unbeaten streak. I think we're the likeliest club of any of the 29 others to be able to out-talent the Dodgers anytime soon.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...