Jump to content

Who’s your favorite enemy?


HowAboutThat

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Angels still have the worst record in the AL.  Just proving that baseball is the ultimate team sport.

Are there other sports remotely comparable to baseball in that sense?  Are there superstar football players who basically never played in the postseason? The 1930 Yankees had seven Hall of Famers in their primes, including Ruth and Gehrig, and finished 16 games out of first.  The Cubs of Banks, Santo, Billy Williams, didn't just not make the postseason, most of the time they didn't even contend.  I love it when a complete underdog takes down a $200M team, like in 2012, but sometimes you get the feeling everything is just kind of random.

Oh, and as for the original question I don't like any Yanks or Red Sox until they've retired or gone to other organizations.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Are there other sports remotely comparable to baseball in that sense?  Are there superstar football players who basically never played in the postseason? The 1930 Yankees had seven Hall of Famers in their primes, including Ruth and Gehrig, and finished 16 games out of first.  The Cubs of Banks, Santo, Billy Williams, didn't just not make the postseason, most of the time they didn't even contend.  I love it when a complete underdog takes down a $200M team, like in 2012, but sometimes you get the feeling everything is just kind of random.

Oh, and as for the original question I don't like any Yanks or Red Sox until they've retired or gone to other organizations.

Baseball is the truest team sport. The best pitcher whoever lived can only pitch, The best hitter ever only comes to plate once in nine, the best centerfielder ever can only play one position. And it’s not just the nine on the field, it’s the organization being able to plug-in other capable replacements when the inevitable injury happens.
That is why I am happy with Mike, and reluctant to complain about his moves. He’s doing his best to remake every aspect of the organization, and that is really a big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Philip said:

Baseball is the truest team sport. The best pitcher whoever lived can only pitch, The best hitter ever only comes to plate once in nine, the best centerfielder ever can only play one position. And it’s not just the nine on the field, it’s the organization being able to plug-in other capable replacements when the inevitable injury happens.
That is why I am happy with Mike, and reluctant to complain about his moves. He’s doing his best to remake every aspect of the organization, and that is really a big deal.

I agree with everything you wrote, after your first sentence.

I could make a strong case, about football being a true team sport. The Qb depends on his OL to give the WRs time to get down the field, especially his guys on his blind side.

The intended target needs the other targets to act well and draw some defenders their way. Running backs depend on guys blocking and opening up holes for yardage.

You can talk defense schemes and its all teamwork there too.

3rd and long, and you depend on your nickel or dime package to defend against the pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Are there other sports remotely comparable to baseball in that sense?  Are there superstar football players who basically never played in the postseason? The 1930 Yankees had seven Hall of Famers in their primes, including Ruth and Gehrig, and finished 16 games out of first.  The Cubs of Banks, Santo, Billy Williams, didn't just not make the postseason, most of the time they didn't even contend.  I love it when a complete underdog takes down a $200M team, like in 2012, but sometimes you get the feeling everything is just kind of random.

Oh, and as for the original question I don't like any Yanks or Red Sox until they've retired or gone to other organizations.

Barry Sanders played in two playoff games, both in 1991.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I agree with everything you wrote, after your first sentence.

I could make a strong case, about football being a true team sport. The Qb depends on his OL to give the WRs time to get down the field, especially his guys on his blind side.

The intended target needs the other targets to act well and draw some defenders their way. Running backs depend on guys blocking and opening up holes for yardage.

You can talk defense schemes and its all teamwork there too.

3rd and long, and you depend on your nickel or dime package to defend against the pass.

Yes that is completely true, and in many ways George carlin is right when he compared the football to the military, but a great quarterback adapts to the limitations of his team. He has terrible wide receivers, so he runs, and vice versa. If he has a bad defensive line, he works on being very fast, and so on. The point is that he can- to an extent- compensate for the weaknesses of his team, But in baseball the only way to upgrade leftfield is to get another left fielder.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

Baseball is the truest team sport. The best pitcher whoever lived can only pitch, The best hitter ever only comes to plate once in nine, the best centerfielder ever can only play one position. And it’s not just the nine on the field, it’s the organization being able to plug-in other capable replacements when the inevitable injury happens.
That is why I am happy with Mike, and reluctant to complain about his moves. He’s doing his best to remake every aspect of the organization, and that is really a big deal.

It's a blessing and a curse.  It's hard to sell people on getting really invested in big players and big personalities and watching all the time when even the best players don't guarantee your team is any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It's a blessing and a curse.  It's hard to sell people on getting really invested in big players and big personalities and watching all the time when even the best players don't guarantee your team is any good.

I really think baseball is more about the team than about the individual players. The individual players all come and go, but the team remains the same.

I miss Manny and Nate Mclouth and Caleb But the team is the team and I watch the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sorry, don't know how what I looked up said different.

 

No problem. I know he got tired of never winning anything. I was at his his last game. Meaningless game in Baltimore to end the 98 season. Of course nobody knew it at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Philip said:

Yes that is completely true, and in many ways George carlin is right when he compared the football to the military, but a great quarterback adapts to the limitations of his team. He has terrible wide receivers, so he runs, and vice versa. If he has a bad defensive line, he works on being very fast, and so on. The point is that he can- to an extent- compensate for the weaknesses of his team, But in baseball the only way to upgrade leftfield is to get another left fielder.

is your RB is weak, then you replace him, if your kicker cant kick worth a crap, then you replace him.

Bradshaw was a decent but not great QB, he had fantastic people around him, and they won 5 SBs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Redskins Rick said:

is your RB is weak, then you replace him, if your kicker cant kick worth a crap, then you replace him.

Bradshaw was a decent but not great QB, he had fantastic people around him, and they won 5 SBs.

 

Yeah, I don't really get the point of their argument. All of the team sports are extensively influenced by the team. Even in basketball, which I think is regarded as the most superstar-centric of them all, Jordan won nothing until he got better teammates, same with LeBron. The NFL is incredibly team reliant. I don't get why we have to try and elevate baseball as somehow different. In fact, I think the starting pitcher probably has the most influence of any individual in sports over the outcome of a single game, the only problem is you can't use him every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Soto has been fine since his first couple appearances and appears to be picking up steam. That makes seven. Problem is Cano has been the most reliable and all of a sudden looked terrible twice in a row. Hopefully he can get in one decent appearance in the final series.
    • So It's 13 pitchers for the Wild card round? What position player are you dropping?
    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...