Jump to content

Elias speaks on a wide range of topics


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Well because it says the number of coaches will remain the same, it’s pretty obvious that Flores was not fired for financial reasons, but as the infield coach, he was probably fired because he was terrible. He was a bad coach, but rather than say “you suck” they told him that it was financial. Let’s hope that the next guy is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

Well because it says the number of coaches will remain the same, it’s pretty obvious that Flores was not fired for financial reasons, but as the infield coach, he was probably fired because he was terrible. He was a bad coach, but rather than say “you suck” they told him that it was financial. Let’s hope that the next guy is better.

If you have a ML pitching coach and a director of pitching and now you have one guy doing both then you eliminated an employee.  Does anyone think Holt is getting two paychecks and two sets of benefits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I watched the Elias video and read Roch's blog. (I recommend the video)

Several things:

1) Sounds like the new minors league structure will have minor league teams and something like the Alternate Camp.  And the rules will be changed to allow minor league player to move between the two.   At least that is what I think I hear.

2) Elias thinks that Sanchez can play 2B, 3B and believes he could help at SS.    We knew about 2B/3B but hearing what Mike said makes me think that Sanchez may be the first backup for Iglesias at short.   That is significant for the roster configuration.  If Elias can sign him before the arbitration date.

3) Sounds like Elias thinks that Lowther and Baumann are very close be being able to contribute at the major league level. 

4) He mentioned making a path for prospects which made me think about trading Nunez to make room for Diaz.  Mike did not say that directly.

A side note I saw from other articles.  O's signed catcher Taylor Davis as minor league free agent.  That would seem to allow them to take the risk of DFAing Wynns to open another spot of the 40 man roster.

 

Doubtful Nunez can be traded. He’s basically replacement level (.03 fWAR) and limited to DH.

He’ll be sent on his way When his spot is needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Philip said:

Doubtful Nunez can be traded. He’s basically replacement level (.03 fWAR) and limited to DH.

He’ll be sent on his way When his spot is needed.

That’s the third or fourth time I’ve seen you say Nunez was worth .03 fWAR.    It’s not .03, it’s 0.3.    That projects out to 0.8 fWAR if they had played a full season.  And that is not a replacement level player.   It’s not great, but not replacement level.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

Some team may just be looking to increase their home run totals and Nunez projects to hit 30 or more.   The 90 RBI in 2019 also could be attractive to a team.

I don't think a single MLB team thinks like this anymore. They might say something like that in a press release or interview to sell it to the average fan, but there's no way the guys building the roster are talking about bringing in guys to "increase homers and RBIs"

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChosenOne21 said:

I don't think a single MLB team thinks like this anymore. They might say something like that in a press release or interview to sell it to the average fan, but there's no way the guys building the roster are talking about bringing in guys to "increase homers and RBIs"

Tony LaRussa was just name White Sox manager.   Ruben Amaro Jr is a candidate for the Angels GM.   Jerry Dipoto is the Mariner GM.   We'll see who values homers and RBI.   Especially  on the cheap.  30 homers for 2M might be enticing.

Not everyone in the game is a young analytics only guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

That’s the third or fourth time I’ve seen you say Nunez was worth .03 fWAR.    It’s not .03, it’s 0.3.    That projects out to 0.8 fWAR if they had played a full season.  And that is not a replacement level player.   It’s not great, but not replacement level.    

Oops you’re exactly right. Wrong decimal point location. So what? He’s terrible. Do YOU want to keep him? He has minimal value, including none on defense, and we don’t need him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildcard said:

WAR is only one measure of Nunez's worth.  Some team may just be looking to increase their home run totals and Nunez projects to hit 30 or more.   The 90 RBI in 2019 also could be attractive to a team.

He can’t run, he can’t defend. He hits better than average but not enough to compensate. If the team thinks they must have his offense, that’s fine, but he’s too limited to be of value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Tony LaRussa was just name White Sox manager.   Ruben Amaro Jr is a candidate for the Angels GM.   Jerry Dipoto is the Mariner GM.   We'll see who values homers and RBI.   Especially  on the cheap.  30 homers for 2M might be enticing.

Not everyone in the game is a young analytics only guy.

Well, they should be.

I agree, 30 homers has a place, I just don't think anyone would be willing to pay a premium for it.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Philip said:

He can’t run, he can’t defend. He hits better than average but not enough to compensate. If the team thinks they must have his offense, that’s fine, but he’s too limited to be of value.

I wouldn't have thought Milone and Cashner had value.  He very well may not, but it may depend more on expectations for return.

They aren't exciting moves, but after years of ignoring these international signings, building even small pieces is something.  Not arguing you're wrong, but maybe we could get something that is deemed small enough to be better than outright cuts.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, wildcard said:

WAR is only one measure of Nunez's worth.  Some team may just be looking to increase their home run totals and Nunez projects to hit 30 or more.   The 90 RBI in 2019 also could be attractive to a team.

I think the biggest problem with overreliance on WAR is that it does not account for the combination of different skills you need to field a good baseball team.   In other words, a team of 9 Trey Mancini’s in the lineup (2019 version) would hit well but the fielding would be absurdly bad.    A team of 9 Nick Ahmed’s probably wouldn’t go very far either, though the glove work might be slick.   I think a guy like Nunez can have a role on a team, even if he’s not an all around player.   Is it the most valuable role?   Not really.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...