Jump to content

2009 Draft: #6 Tyler Matzek


Recommended Posts

I wonder, though, if the Orioles (Angelos) would choose a high school pitcher in the first round, after their experience with Loewen.

Angelos doesn't really make the decisions on who is chosen, that would be Joe Jordan, and Jordan will choose the best player on his board.

Wouldn't it bad to have two very similar pitchers be your 1 and 2 in the rotation or 1 and 3. I would think the secound of the two pitchers is at a huge disadvantige, or could it just be you split them up and have them pitch two games apart. Just some food for thought.

I understand what you're getting at, but it's far too early to worry about those sort of things. If we are fortunate enough to not only draft Matzek and have both he and Matusz in our future rotation, the manager will set his rotation for the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to get any of these pitchers as they all sound like they have great potential, I'm wary of drafting a SS this high though

USC shortstop Grant Green is the only SS to be profiled by Greg so far. Are you referring to him? If you are, let me reinforce the fact that (as things stand now) the O's will be lucky to draft him. He is an elite prospect and would be a great prospect for the O's. If it wasn't for Strasburg, who stands well above the rest of the draft class, Green would have a legit shot at the #1 pick. Just to offer a comparison - I was a big fan of Tim Beckham last year, and IMO Green is better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Guest BrettMeister86

I would be thrilled with either Green, White, or Crow. Strasburg just isn't an option, but the other three could do some shuffling. We do NOT need any more outfielders, I'm leary of HS pitchers, and there are no outstanding first baseman early in this draft.

SS or College Starter. That is IT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be thrilled with either Green, White, or Crow. Strasburg just isn't an option, but the other three could do some shuffling. We do NOT need any more outfielders, I'm leary of HS pitchers, and there are no outstanding first baseman early in this draft.

SS or College Starter. That is IT.

I'll pass on Crow and White due to mechanical reasons that I showed in a different thread in this section. Give me Greene, Gibson, or Matzek in that order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough. I could be on board with taking Matzek over Gibson. I just like Gibson's projectability and potential longevity.

Yeah, I agree, I wrote the write up on him on Greg's site, I am a fan, and I'm kind of looking for him to make the jump into the top 3-4 discussion this season, I'm just not willing to take him ahead of a couple guys until he's proven that he can and is willing to add to his frame and he can handle the mental side of getting a team's best opposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I agree, I wrote the write up on him on Greg's site, I am a fan, and I'm kind of looking for him to make the jump into the top 3-4 discussion this season, I'm just not willing to take him ahead of a couple guys until he's proven that he can and is willing to add to his frame and he can handle the mental side of getting a team's best opposition.

So as it stands now, would you be disappointed if the Orioles took him over Matzek? I think everyone can agree they'd be disappointed if we passed Green up for Gibson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So as it stands now, would you be disappointed if the Orioles took him over Matzek? I think everyone can agree they'd be disappointed if we passed Green up for Gibson.

Right this minute, yeah a little, but not much. But I expect Gibson to improve more this season. I think it's really typical college versus HS pitcher, polish versus ceiling. I lump Matzek, Gibson, White, and Crow into the #2 slot behind Strasburg. All with pluses and minuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...