Jump to content

A take on Keegan Akin


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

How does that change anything?

The principle is the same. 

It isn't accurate to say that "it can't hurt to try to get better".  Certain courses of action are more likely to end up with favorable outcomes.

 

Honestly, this is not a topic I think most of us are qualified to opine on.    And, I don’t think the answer is the same for every pitcher.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Honestly, this is not a topic I think most of us are qualified to opine on.    And, I don’t think the answer is the same for every pitcher.   

I think we are all qualified to opine on it in the general sense.  I can spend my resources trying to learn to dunk a basketball but I don't think it will be a fruitful endeavor.

Akin might be better off concentrating on two pitches.  It could be a waste of resources for him to "try and get better" at throwing breaking balls.  Those resources could potentially be better off being allocated elsewhere.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any research addressing the question of whether “learning a new pitch” is more or less effective  than “refining an existing one?”

I just searched the phrase and got nothing in response.

Refining a skill is like charging a battery. The better you get, the harder it is to get better. 
So it seems logical that a guy with a good but not elite pitch would be better served by learning a new one than by trying to develop his good pitch into elite status.

However, there are doubtless multiple highly successful examples of each option, so the question would have to be settled on an individual basis. I hope the Bmore coaches see the right things and offer the right guidance.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

How does that change anything?

The principle is the same. 

It isn't accurate to say that "it can't hurt to try to get better".  Certain courses of action are more likely to end up with favorable outcomes.

 

It changes everything.  He didn’t have the information to help before.  Now he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, VaBird1 said:

It changes everything.  He didn’t have the information to help before.  Now he does.

First off the information was available before this year.  That stuff was purchased before the 2019 season.

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/news/orioles-pitchers-using-technology-in-camp-c304073646

 

Secondly it doesn't change the point I was making.  You stated, I'm paraphrasing because I've already directly quoted you numerous times, that no harm can come of him working to refine a breaking ball.  I don't agree and I think there is at least a possibility that the better course of action will be to concentrate his efforts into improving other parts of his game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

First off the information was available before this year.  That stuff was purchased before the 2019 season.

https://www.mlb.com/orioles/news/orioles-pitchers-using-technology-in-camp-c304073646

 

Secondly it doesn't change the point I was making.  You stated, I'm paraphrasing because I've already directly quoted you numerous times, that no harm can come of him working to refine a breaking ball.  I don't agree and I think there is at least a possibility that the better course of action will be to concentrate his efforts into improving other parts of his game.

That article actually says that they did not have Rapsodo in 2019.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/24/2020 at 7:29 PM, OrioleDog said:

Re-visiting Arthur Rhodes B-Ref, I would not have guessed his first 50 appearances across four seasons were 100% starts.  

He gets a free look with an easy rotation job starting next year, but Akin, Hall and Harvey are an aspirational A/B/C relievers for a 2022 bullpen that will hopefully scare somebody late in the year.   Obviously the odds are against going 3-for-3 getting SP out of Baumann/Hall/Rodriguez, and bullpen Hall is perhaps in play.

I think by the mid-20's the gap between super relievers like Akin and Hall and back rotation guys like Kremer and whoever of Lowther, Smith, Stallings, Bradish etc shows out behind Grayson, Means and Baumann won't be much more than like 25ish IP, and the manager will pick higher leverage for the 80-ish from the reliever Akin/Hall type guy.    Obviously there's a #3 SP-sized hole in that forecast if Baumann proves unavailable.   

Its almost impossible to overstate how Mike Leake pigeonholed Kremer is in my mind as a set and forget #4 SP who might not make your postseason roster.

By entering 2023, if an SEC ace like Leiter, Hill or Rocker with some new wart becomes our pick this July they could be in the picture too.  We seem to like the SEC, though I couldn't say if that is more than anyone else - just looking at Kjerstad reach followed by Westburg/Servideo, and selection of Smith and Stallings in recent trades there.  Maybe that is all a byproduct of those few weeks of 2020 SEC before the shutdown being the highest level minor league games played all year.

Unless Akin really astonishes with a third pitch breakout, I suspect him remaining among the team's 5 best SP more than another year or two will be a bad sign, but the game itself is actively searching for his Glass Half Full and I think a contributor is there.

Does anyone else really enjoy Orioledog's posts and spend several re-reads just to make sure they completely got what he was writing?  Just me?   Even if so, please carry on Orioledog!

As for Akin, I am Wildcard optimistic.  I am hoping for a two pitch lefty (three if he doesn't spend too much valuable time learning a third at the expense of bettering the two primary pitches in his arsenal. I see you CoC) that ends up as a dominate, can get through the lineup 3+ times starter with a sub 3.00 ERA.  12+K/9 and the beginnings of a HOF career!

Oh and the Eggnog was exceptional tonight.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

Do we know if he has both a 4 seam and a 2 seam FB? Wouldn't a 4 seam play up in the strike zone and the 2 seam play down and lead to GBs? Assuming they are thrown with the same motion, would that give him another pitch in the mix so he wouldn't need to show the curve as much?

Per Statcast he’s exclusively a 4-seam guy.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/25/2020 at 1:28 PM, Can_of_corn said:

I think we are all qualified to opine on it in the general sense.  I can spend my resources trying to learn to dunk a basketball but I don't think it will be a fruitful endeavor.

Akin might be better off concentrating on two pitches.  It could be a waste of resources for him to "try and get better" at throwing breaking balls.  Those resources could potentially be better off being allocated elsewhere.

 

8 foot rims?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

8 foot rims?

I am 6’2” and in my youth had rather limited hops.   On my best day I could get my fingers maybe 1-2” over the rim.  But I often wondered, if someone offered me a million dollars if I could dunk a basketball within a year, whether I would have been motivated enough and able to train myself to do it.     Obviously it ain’t happening now at age 63, but at 22-23 I think I could have done it if it was worth it to me.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

I am 6’2” and in my youth had rather limited hops.   On my best day I could get my fingers maybe 1-2” over the rim.  But I often wondered, if someone offered me a million dollars if I could dunk a basketball within a year, whether I would have been motivated enough and able to train myself to do it.     Obviously it ain’t happening now at age 63, but at 22-23 I think I could have done it if it was worth it to me.    

So it's probably a good thing you concentrated on law school and not dunking.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
    • LOL, I was worried last year about getting swept in four games by the Red Sox when the magic number for the division was 1. Part of being a fan is imagining the worst case scenario. I would agree it's not likely, though.
    • O's just need to win 1. O's lose home field if they go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0. I actually have no idea what happens if the O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0, and Royals go 3-0. They'd all be 88-74. O's have tiebreaker over the Royals, but not over the Tigers. Royals have the tiebreaker over the Tigers, but not the Orioles. lol Does anybody know what happens in that situation? Does it go to intradivision?  If so, here are their records intradivision: Orioles: 32-20 (.615)  in AL East Royals: 33-19 (.634) in AL Central Tigers: 27-22 in AL Central Interestingly enough, that loss against the Yankees now means the Royals have the intradivision tie breaker. So it does look like there are 2 scenarios where the O's don't get home field: O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0 OR O's go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0/Royals go 3-0. If the Tigers lose, doesn't matter what the Royals or O's do.  I think?
    • Skubal holds Slater to a .000 average/.000 OPS. SSS with only 5 AB's, but he's 0-5 with 0 walks and 2k's. DH vs Skubal = Rivera
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...