Jump to content

Hays: my favorite current Oriole


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, glenn__davis said:

Knowing Hays this slight discomfort will result in him being out for 8 weeks. 

These were my thoughts when I saw this happen. It didn’t look like a bad pull. Anyone else I wouldn’t expect to miss much time (if any) but with Hays it seems like a multi-week absence is in order. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/5/2021 at 11:08 PM, OriolesMagic83 said:

I like Hays, but he is the Glass Man to Cal's Iron Man.  How many times did Cal play through a sore hamstring, bruises, stiff joints, etc?

How many times did Cal follow up a 11-WAR season and an MVP with hitting .251 with 14 homers?  Streak was cool and all, but man did Cal have some wild swings in performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

How many times did Cal follow up a 11-WAR season and an MVP with hitting .251 with 14 homers?  Streak was cool and all, but man did Cal have some wild swings in performance.

I'm not sure those wild swings in performance would have been quelled with a day off here or there.  

Even if he wasn't getting it done with the bat his defense still brought a lot of value.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

I'm not sure those wild swings in performance would have been quelled with a day off here or there.  

Even if he wasn't getting it done with the bat his defense still brought a lot of value.  

On your first point... we just don't know.  Could be that he alternated hitting .320 and .250 because he changed his stances every 20 minutes on the advice of Cal Sr.

Second point, yes, his defensive value helped smooth out the curve.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

On your first point... we just don't know.  Could be that he alternated hitting .320 and .250 because he changed his stances every 20 minutes on the advice of Cal Sr.

Second point, yes, his defensive value helped smooth out the curve.

I'm inclined to agree that the changing of the batting stances at the drop of a hat played a part.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...