Jump to content

Orioles considering Franco?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, interloper said:

It's Heyman so whatever. But no reason to think the Os wouldn't at least check to see if they can get a good deal. Pretty classic deadline trade kind of guy. Upgrade over Ruiz for sure. 

Ultimately $4-8 mil sounds a little steep for the chance at a trade chip. And it's definitely too steep for simply upgrading the offense a bit in a rebuild year. Would I be for it? Oh hell yeah.

Ahhh, right.  "The ball is coming out of his hand nicely" is to @Frobby as "we can sign this guy in spring training and trade him at the deadline" is to Moose Milligan.

The idea that we could trade a guy who's readily available to anyone right now and get something halfway decent is laughable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Ahhh, right.  "The ball is coming out of his hand nicely" is to @Frobby as "we can sign this guy in spring training and trade him at the deadline" is to Moose Milligan.

The idea that we could trade a guy who's readily available to anyone right now and get something halfway decent is laughable.  

You don't like the idea of paying him a million so you can pick up a 17 year old Dominican at the deadline?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Ahhh, right.  "The ball is coming out of his hand nicely" is to @Frobby as "we can sign this guy in spring training and trade him at the deadline" is to Moose Milligan.

The idea that we could trade a guy who's readily available to anyone right now and get something halfway decent is laughable.  

If Tommy Milone can be flipped for ANYTHING at the deadline like he was last year, anyone can be flipped.

Hitting in Oriole Park, Franco could certainly put together a nice few months to the point a contender in need of a #6/#7 hitter or that had their 3B go down with an injury would be willing to send us a B prospect or two. Franco has been a competent hitter for stretches several times in the recent past.

We traded a bunch for Gerardo Parra, who everyone in baseball knew was just having a hot couple months. But Dan Duquette was dumb and acquired a terrible rental, hurting our long-term outlook in the process. Still plenty of GMs out there who will be as dumb or desperate as Duquette was in 2015.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Brooks The Great said:

If Tommy Milone can be flipped for ANYTHING at the deadline like he was last year, anyone can be flipped.

Hitting in Oriole Park, Franco could certainly put together a nice few months to the point a contender in need of a #6/#7 hitter or that had their 3B go down with an injury would be willing to send us a B prospect or two. Franco has been a competent hitter for stretches several times in the recent past.

We traded a bunch for Gerardo Parra, who everyone in baseball knew was just having a hot couple months. But Dan Duquette was dumb and acquired a terrible rental, hurting our long-term outlook in the process. Still plenty of GMs out there who will be as dumb or desperate as Duquette was in 2015.

I said halfway decent.  Like Milone, we'd probably end up with organizational filler for Maikel Franco.  And that's fine, but I don't get why people would be excited about it or at the very least, find it interesting.  

Anyway, unless I'm not looking at something correctly here, MLB.com straight up has the wrong stats for Franco:

https://www.mlb.com/player/maikel-franco-596748?stats=career-s-hitting-mlb&year=202

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Ahhh, right.  "The ball is coming out of his hand nicely" is to @Frobby as "we can sign this guy in spring training and trade him at the deadline" is to Moose Milligan.

The idea that we could trade a guy who's readily available to anyone right now and get something halfway decent is laughable.  

Tommy Milone says :new_wave:

 

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2020/11/braves-orioles-complete-tommy-milone-trade.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...