Jump to content

“We’ve got to start playing better defense"


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jabba72 said:

Statcast has Galvis as 33 OAA from 2015-20 with Iglesias at 22 during the same time period, so I dont think the O's are losing anything defensively unless some age regression happens. Statcast is saying Galvis was the better defender.  I think the O's look like they'll be a above average defensive team this year. Probably no GG winners, but solid. Mountcastle and Cisco /Severino are the only real question marks. 

Ruiz says hello...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

You conveniently left off last year's numbers. Now maybe Galvis struggled for a reason last year defensively, but he was not good according to statcast while Iglesias was excellent.

Hopefully it was the weight gain that was mentioned, although I’m not sure we have heard anymore about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Philip said:

As long as I have been following the Orioles, the focus has been on a fence at the expense of defense, regardless of what anybody said. The fact that we had Sterling Defense for a few years was apparently luck more than anything else.

any team with a lineup that includes Valencia, Trumbo, Alvarez, and a couple other names that escape me at the moment, doesn’t care about D.

This is wrong.  You can’t and won’t have great defenders at every position and even if you did, your offense would likely suck to the point where great defense wouldn’t matter.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

This is wrong.  You can’t and won’t have great defenders at every position and even if you did, your offense would likely suck to the point where great defense wouldn’t matter.

But you’ve got to have SOME guys who are good. Manny was magic. Everyone else was average or worse by about:2016, and nothing has improved. And the guys I mentioned were poster boys for bad D, although Valencia was an ok 1B, and Trumbo would have been as well, but some fool decided he was an outfielder 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Philip said:

But you’ve got to have SOME guys who are good. Manny was magic. Everyone else was average or worse by about:2016, and nothing has improved. And the guys I mentioned were poster boys for bad D, although Valencia was an ok 1B, and Trumbo would have been as well, but some fool decided he was an outfielder 

They did have some guys.  The defenses were very good in the 2012-2014 years.  
 

2016 team wasn’t as good but they still made the playoffs, so I’m not sure why you feel the need to bring that up as if it was some failure on their part?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Philip said:

But you’ve got to have SOME guys who are good. Manny was magic. Everyone else was average or worse by about:2016, and nothing has improved. And the guys I mentioned were poster boys for bad D, although Valencia was an ok 1B, and Trumbo would have been as well, but some fool decided he was an outfielder 

That fool was Mike Scioscia. Trumbo started 96 games in the outfield in 2012 after the Angels signed Pujols. He continued to play outfield primarily for the 2014 & 2015 Dbacks and the 2015 Mariners. He was an embarrassment out there, for sure, but it's not like the Orioles were the first fools to play him in the grass.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

They did have some guys.  The defenses were very good in the 2012-2014 years.  
 

2016 team wasn’t as good but they still made the playoffs, so I’m not sure why you feel the need to bring that up as if it was some failure on their part?

The 2012-14 teams had great defense. The 2016 team barely squeaked into the playoffs as the second wildcard(iirc) a single additional win and they would’ve been the first wildcard, but the defense was terrible and getting worse. 2017 didn’t happen without some long term blindness, And ignoring defense was a large part of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Beef Supreme said:

That fool was Mike Scioscia. Trumbo started 96 games in the outfield in 2012 after the Angels signed Pujols. He continued to play outfield primarily for the 2014 & 2015 Dbacks and the 2015 Mariners. He was an embarrassment out there, for sure, but it's not like the Orioles were the first fools to play him in the grass.

Oh I never said the Orioles were the first, he had some definite “web gems” as a diamondback, But that just makes it all the more inexplicable why Buck and Dan thought he was a competent outfielder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Philip said:

The 2012-14 teams had great defense. The 2016 team barely squeaked into the playoffs as the second wildcard(iirc) a single additional win and they would’ve been the first wildcard, but the defense was terrible and getting worse. 2017 didn’t happen without some long term blindness, And ignoring defense was a large part of that.

Lack of talent was the reason for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
22 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I just looked at the box score for tonights game against the Pirates.  5 errors, wtf?

Watch the game tomorrow morning on replay.  You won’t regret it. 
 

The 5 errors do not tell the whole story.  
 

It was much worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, eddie83 said:

Watch the game tomorrow morning on replay.  You won’t regret it. 
 

The 5 errors do not tell the whole story.  
 

It was much worse. 

Yep,  great circle routes to fly balls. Throwing the ball around the field like little leaguers.  The wind was howling so some of the fly balls were an adventure but still.  BTW the Pirates had 4 errors so what ever was going on was contagious 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Wait, are you saying that it's the combined H2H? I guess that does make sense. So, in that circumstance, in a 3 way tie...the Tigers get the #4 seed, the O's #5, and Royals #6?
    • Bubic is really good. Zerpa has a pretty bad K-BB rate on the season though and gives up hard contact, so it looks like that may just be a good stretch for him. His xERA is 4.49 on the season. Lynch is solid but he’s a low K, low BB lefty. Definitely not bad, but he’s going to give up contact.  
    • Yeah, I was tracking #1 overall at some point, not next year. Unless Basallo still has rookie eligibility, I don't see anyone having a chance after next season.
    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...