Jump to content

The defense thread 2021


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Game 1, April 2

i didn’t watch the entire game, so others can elaborate.   But from following the game thread:

- Rio Ruiz, playing at 2B, made not one, not two, but three fine plays in the field.    Two over the shoulder catches and a third play where I’m not sure what happened.   

- Maikel Franco booted a routine grounder at 3B, one of only two baserunners all game against John Means.  

- Not sure what it was, but I believe Mancini made a nice play at 1B.   

- In the 9th, Austin Hays almost nabbed JD Martinez at 2B with a perfect rifle strike from the LF corner, but Martinez got in just ahead of the throw.    

- Pedro Severino then let a strike tick off his glove and go all the way to the backstop to advance Martinez to 3B.   It turned out not to matter, as the hitter hit a liner to Santander that ended the game.   Still, sloppy play by Severino.   

Hopefully someone can elaborate on the third Ruiz play and the Mancini play, plus anything else of note that I missed.   




 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Natty said:

Ruiz made the 3 best defensive plays of the game. And he showed great range. Right now he's the leading candidate for the 2B gold glove award. ?

I watched the over the shoulder play on replay and while it was a great play I can't help but think he should have let Santander make the attempt.  But he, he made the catch so it's cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I watched the over the shoulder play on replay and while it was a great play I can't help but think he should have let Santander make the attempt.  But he, he made the catch so it's cool.

Naturally when Enrique took one of those away from Renfroe, Garceau and Palmer were there with the observation it was probably the outfielder's ball.

It's all about the laundry you wear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I watched the over the shoulder play on replay and while it was a great play I can't help but think he should have let Santander make the attempt.  But he, he made the catch so it's cool.

That’s not how it works. An IF is supposed to keep pursuing until the OF calls him off. Who knows if that happened but the IF does not just stop to let the OF make the play. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TWpj said:

That’s not how it works. An IF is supposed to keep pursuing until the OF calls him off. Who knows if that happened but the IF does not just stop to let the OF make the play. 

 

13 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The 2B keeps going until the OF calls him off.  Naturally,  Ruiz was watching the ball, not Santander.  It's also questionable if Santander gets there.  Great play by Ruiz.  He did everything right.

I assumed Santander was trying to call him off, if he wasn't that was, of course, on Santander.  He had the easier play on the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Whatever you say.

I'm sorry, you're right, its way easier to go out on the ball and catch in like that instead of coming in on the ball.  Santander also wasn't so close to the play that he had to slide to keep from complicating the play. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with those that say it didn't look like Santander was going to get to the ball.  He should not call anyone off unless he is sure he can get there.  Maybe it just looked that we because he let up when he saw Ruiz was not slowing down and he wanted to avoid a collision.  Was Santander playing way off the line and deep?  He seemed like he should have been able to run under that ball - it was in the air for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Easier play for the outfielder, assuming he can get there.  You're pretty big on assumptions.  When you're wrong all you do is pivot and go in a different direction.  It's standard CoC.

He was there.

He had to pull up and slide to not interfere with the play.

How was he not going to get there?

I will admit I didn't think Santander wouldn't have called him off...what with the mask and all.

The announcers are even assuming Santander will make the play.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

I assumed Santander was trying to call him off, if he wasn't that was, of course, on Santander.  He had the easier play on the ball. 

He had the easier play on the ball if he was able to make it there but it didn't seem like he was.  Pulled up and slid to avoid the collision doesn't necessarily mean he could have made the catch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

I saw him slide. Pull up as if he was easily going to get there and slid only to avoid Ruiz.  Is that what you're selling?

He was running hard to get to the ball but it certainly looked to me like he had time to make the play.  I'm not suggesting it was a super easy play for either player.

Silly thing to argue about really but yea, if the outfielder can get to the ball he should call off the infielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

You're original point was that Ruiz should have let him make the play.  Now the argument is whether Santander "pulled up".  You state that as a fact.  LOL

My original point was made with the assumption that Santander was calling him off.  I've admitted that was an assumption on my part.  I should not have made that assumption.

With regards to Frobby...did you think I didn't already know the (general) answer to the question I'd asked?  I've posted about the time tables for college catchers that were top five picks before.  I wasn't "owned".  I was on mobile at the time and didn't feel like pulling up the exact figure.  Frobby is normally very nice about getting data like that.

I should have repped him for the work tho.  I've gone back and fixed that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think if you're the orioles, you need to sit and figure out what you want to do. I would bring back Burnes, or at least try to. If you can't keep Burnes, which is looking to be a real possibility, do you trade for another TOR starter with the prospect pool we have or try the Free Agent route? QO Santander, but do you trust Kjerstad or stand outside of Santander's house with a boombox to woo him back? The FA market for outfield sucks this year. What are we going to do with the infield? Do you make trades to see what you can do to improve the roster in the next 2 to 3 years, because the infield has a glut of prospects. How patient are you with letting Basallo develop on the MLB roster if a spot finds itself open, if you want to field offers on Mountcastle. Where do Holliday and Mayo fit into next year's team, or do you try to sell high on Urias? 
    • I know, and I never said you said he should be handed the job.  But after seeing the rest of our prospects and so called young core look absolutely awful for most of September and into the playoffs, I'm just not interested in seeing another one of them come up and struggle again and again. I'm sure Mayo is a talented hitter and you're right to point out the small sample size...but I don't know if the Orioles hitting coaches are doing him any favors.   But my gripe really wasn't about his lack of hitting so far, it was that he still doesn't seem to have a position.  I don't know where he fits from that perspective.  
    • No matter what you want to call it, these guys came up small way too often in pressure situations. I truly believe that when a few guys went down, others put more pressure on themselves to pick it up, especially when Holliday came up and failed spectacularly.  A few losses started to mount up and then the team really felt pressure in close games, and they continued to fail.  Now do I think Gunnar is a "choke artist?" No, I think he's a young hitter who failed when he was given an opportunity to do something special. It's going to happen. Now did he probably have more pressure on him to do well because no one else was hitting? Sure. Do I think Santander and Cowser choked? Absolutely. Santander needed to have a professional at bat and instead swing at a ball at his chin to start off the at bat, then popped up to first base. Cowser striking out on a ball that hit him was an approach issue as well as a guy who definitely has shown he can't handle pressure at bats at this point in his career.  Mountcastle issue's is he's just not very good and can be gotten out by never throwing him a strike. Adley, well, Adley has been terrible since July. Whatever he has going on is his problem, not the pressure.  At the end of the day, if you have bases loaded and no outs and your 3,4,5 hitters are coming up and you don't score, that's a pressure issue. If it happened once, ok, but we've seen this time and time again with this team's core players.  
    • Just an update for future reference. Parked there for yesterdays game and it was still $5. Plenty of room in the garage to park especially if you have a newer vehicle and don't like to park in tight spaces. Absolutely zero traffic getting out, waited 2 minutes while people scanned there ticket and I sat in section 388 in left field so I didn't beat people out of the stadium at all. If you don't mind a little bit of a walk, definitely the way to go. Ticket said $5 Monday-Thursday and then $10 on Friday-Sunday. Only difference is Ravens games, there was a sign saying $100 for Ravens games. 
    • I have never said and would never say he should be handed the job. But 41 major league at bats(he had just 4 hits) should not be the determining factor in letting him have a shot. The kid can hit. And will. And he could be a lethal bat for the Orioles.
    • Well that's kind of what I mean.  You look at Witt, he obviously has power but he's not trying to do too much given the situation.  He's not swinging from his heels, he's not trying to hit homers every single time.  His bat to ball skills are elite, but part of that is probably because he knows that he can shorten up and use the whole field when the situation calls for it.   But I also mean aside from good EVs and peripherals...like, Cowser yesterday, what in the F.  Seriously, EVs and peripherals don't tell us about the absolute boneheaded decision to swing at something no matter what.  It's exceptionally rare to see a batter swing at a pitch that actually hits him.  Had you told me that would have been a deciding factor before yesterday's game, I probably wouldn't have believed you...but then thought about it and believed you because it's so pathetic and that's just where we are.  And Mounty almost did the same thing!   So that's what I mean by also just not being talented as we think...it's past EVs and peripherals.  It's about being mindful of situations, especially at the plate in high leverage moments.  You're right, there's time to let it fly and a time to have good team at bats.  And the Orioles just flat out don't do that. I don't know what the hitting coaches preach, I don't know what the "offensive coordinator" (what a joke that sounds like) does...but my goodness, from the looks of it they're certainly don't preach about good team at bats, situational hitting, etc.  
    • Definitely some luck and chance but they were also swinging at a bunch of junk and missing the pitches that were actually hittable. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...