Jump to content

The second guessing Hyde thread.


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

This game showed the decision not to improve the bullpen by Elias was a mistake.  He added Flaherty who is a mop up guy, Webb who was a waiver guy no one else wanted and has gave up two big homers in this series and Fuji who has been so bad he didn’t even make the roster,    We needed to add at least he reliable bullpen guy and we did not.  That is Elias not Hyde.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

This game showed the decision not to improve the bullpen by Elias was a mistake.  He added Flaherty who is a mop up guy, Webb who was a waiver guy no one else wanted and has gave up two big homers in this series and Fuji who has been so bad he didn’t even make the roster,    We needed to add at least he reliable bullpen guy and we did not.  That is Elias not Hyde.  

Grayson Rodriguez: 1.2 IP, 6 H, 4 BB. Game lost by our rookie phenom.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

This game showed the decision not to improve the bullpen by Elias was a mistake.  He added Flaherty who is a mop up guy, Webb who was a waiver guy no one else wanted and has gave up two big homers in this series and Fuji who has been so bad he didn’t even make the roster,    We needed to add at least he reliable bullpen guy and we did not.  That is Elias not Hyde.  

I've said this a few times. If you don't use early draft picks on pitching prospects, don't trade for high-quality pitchers, and add only cheap free agents on short-term contracts and guys waived, released, unprotected or DFAed by other teams, you're not likely to wind up with depth of quality pitchers.  I can't differentiate between Elias's intentions to acquire pitching and John Angelos's financial constraints on doing that, but taken together they form a strategy for building a roster that is, let's say, less than optimal. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

This game showed the decision not to improve the bullpen by Elias was a mistake.  He added Flaherty who is a mop up guy, Webb who was a waiver guy no one else wanted and has gave up two big homers in this series and Fuji who has been so bad he didn’t even make the roster,    We needed to add at least he reliable bullpen guy and we did not.  That is Elias not Hyde.  

Mathematically speaking, Webb has literally been the difference in both games! Hate to say it, but we all saw this coming.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Mathematically speaking, Webb has literally been the difference in both games! Hate to say it, but we all saw this coming.

With the Orioles this year, Webb had given up zero home runs in 22 innings and batters had only hit .203 against him. So I for one did not see it coming.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I've said this a few times. If you don't use early draft picks on pitching prospects, don't trade for high-quality pitchers, and add only cheap free agents on short-term contracts and guys waived, released, unprotected or DFAed by other teams, you're not likely to wind up with depth of quality pitchers.  I can't differentiate between Elias's intentions to acquire pitching and John Angelos's financial constraints on doing that, but taken together they form a strategy for building a roster that is, let's say, less than optimal. 

Regardless of how the rest of the post-season works out for the O's, there's no ignoring the fact that the system needs greater pitching depth.  There's been lots of amazing progress this season in every facet of the organization but now is not the time to let up.  I'll be watching JA's behavior most of all this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LA2 said:

With the Orioles this year, Webb had given up zero home runs in 22 innings and batters had only hit .203 against him. So I for one did not see it coming.

You thought relying on a guy claimed on waivers from the Angels would be a good idea? Sure, I wouldn't have guessed two homers but Webb being actually good also seems wildly improbable on paper. Anyway, I meant more generally that many of us wanted the club to add a high leverage reliever at the trade deadline.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Mathematically speaking, Webb has literally been the difference in both games! Hate to say it, but we all saw this coming.

I didn't. I thought of Baker as the weak spot and Webb as a level or two above him, maybe more. I have revised by opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bpilktree said:

This game showed the decision not to improve the bullpen by Elias was a mistake.  He added Flaherty who is a mop up guy, Webb who was a waiver guy no one else wanted and has gave up two big homers in this series and Fuji who has been so bad he didn’t even make the roster,    We needed to add at least he reliable bullpen guy and we did not.  That is Elias not Hyde.  

At one point during the broadcast, the announcers made a comment that the biggest difference between the two teams was Texas terrible BP and our amazing BP. I laughed out loud but it got me thinking that if the rest of the country thinks we have a great BP, we look like bigger choke artists than we already are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

Mathematically speaking, Webb has literally been the difference in both games! Hate to say it, but we all saw this coming.

If we somehow make it to the next series, Baumann or Irvin should replace Webb on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
    • Really zooming the microscope in on one game with Tarik Skubal, would you consider batting Austin Slater 3rd or 4th to basically pinch hit in the 1st inning, and then replace him in LF with Cowser in the top of the 2nd inning. A tactic that might look good to the SIGBOT but could freak out actual ballplayers.
    • It would make sense. I think there are four possibilities for not announcing Eflin yet: 1. It’s going to be Eflin, we’re just waiting to announce to make it harder for Tigers/Royals to prepare. 2. Hyde and FO are discussing whether to slot Eflin for game 3 to possibly save him for ALDS game 1. 3. Hyde and FO are discussing a possible opener strategy for game 2. 4. Eflin has some minor aches/pains/soreness so we’re delaying the announcement to make sure he will be healthy enough. 
    • I can see the arguments for and against.  Gunnar may have had an opinion.  
    • I know I've been a Oriole critic these last few months but many of us have and deservedly so but congrats are really in order for a team that was decimated with injuries especially the pitching staff and still found a way to 90 wins and the playoffs. The first Orioles team with back to back 90 plus wins since the 1982, 1983  teams. Wow.  That's hard to believe. Also back to back playoff teams something the Machado, Jones, Markakis and Wieters led teams couldn't even pull off.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...