Jump to content

Adley Rutschman 2021


glenn__davis

Recommended Posts

On 6/10/2021 at 6:21 AM, Moose Milligan said:

If AR is what this guy says he is he gets to beat his chest. If AR is God and this guy is wrong? Who cares, whatever his take at that moment was will be buried under a deluge of other takes since posted. Hardly anyone will remember or care. 

Am I the only one on this board who questions AR's hit tool? 

Defense sounds great. Power is likely above a 50, probably a 60. Plate discipline looks great. But the hit tool?

So far to me he looks like a guy who will have a high OPS driven by walks, HR and a relatively low batting average (e.g., .250 - .265). Add great defense and you have a very valuable player, but not necessarily that once in a generation guy. There's nothing wrong with that profile. It's just not a perfect profile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, glenn__davis said:

Not sure why you would think you're alone in that.  I think there have been plenty of comments questioning his hit tool.

I guess that's true. I just don't think we should be dismissive of people like that BP writer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Am I the only one on this board who questions AR's hit tool? 

Defense sounds great. Power is likely above a 50, probably a 60. Plate discipline looks great. But the hit tool?

So far to me he looks like a guy who will have a high OPS driven by walks, HR and a relatively low batting average (e.g., .250 - .265). Add great defense and you have a very valuable player, but not necessarily that once in a generation guy. There's nothing wrong with that profile. It's just not a perfect profile.

Yea, I think it’s fair to say we shouldn’t expect him to hit 300 in the majors.

But a 260/380/550 type slash line is very possible imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Who hits 300 anymore?  Not many guys.

Right now? 13 people.

https://www.mlb.com/stats/batting-average

A .260 average would put him at 68th in MLB, so slightly worse than the 2nd average guy per team, on average. That's not a glowing batting average, which is what many expected from the #1 overall pick in the draft and #2 rated prospect. I'm ok with it. If his OPS ends up in the .900 range, that's closer to top 15-20 in the league. Paired with excellent D and that's very valuable.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Right now? 13 people.

https://www.mlb.com/stats/batting-average

A .260 average would put him at 68th in MLB, so slightly worse than the 2nd average guy per team, on average. That's not a glowing batting average, which is what many expected from the #1 overall pick in the draft and #2 rated prospect. I'm ok with it. If his OPS ends up in the .900 range, that's closer to top 15-20 in the league. Paired with excellent D and that's very valuable.

 

We should be doing cartwheels if AR puts up a 900 OPS in the majors. Buster Posey's first 6 full years in the majors he had an .862 OPS. To me thats the absolute best case scenario. If AR topped that then he would prove to be a great pick. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

We should be doing cartwheels if AR puts up a 900 OPS in the majors. Buster Posey's first 6 full years in the majors he had an .862 OPS. To me thats the absolute best case scenario. If AR topped that then he would prove to be a great pick. 

Agree. SG posted a .930 number, but I agree that’s a quite rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

I guess that's true. I just don't think we should be dismissive of people like that BP writer. 

I was specifically dismissive of the 50 grade on the power. In my opinion, it’s indefensible although I have not been able to read the article and am just going off what OD described.
 

He has your modern day uppercut swing. With it, he might not bat .300 but he’s going to absolutely demolish some baseballs. You don’t put a 50 on that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Right now? 13 people.

https://www.mlb.com/stats/batting-average

A .260 average would put him at 68th in MLB, so slightly worse than the 2nd average guy per team, on average. That's not a glowing batting average, which is what many expected from the #1 overall pick in the draft and #2 rated prospect. I'm ok with it. If his OPS ends up in the .900 range, that's closer to top 15-20 in the league. Paired with excellent D and that's very valuable.

 

Even at 1-1 if you got a guy with plus power, plus selectivity and plus defense at a premium position you are doing just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/11/2021 at 3:53 PM, ArtVanDelay said:

And he would be easily the best catcher in baseball with that slash line. 

And if he did it for the best part of a decade, he'd be very close to the HOF.

I really think we need to temper expectations.  

That should be our best-case scenario.

It's likely to fall short of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...