Jump to content

What do you think of Tyler Wells?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m blanking.   Who are you talking about?   Do you mean a Rule 5 guy?

Tyler Wells, the guy in the title of the thread you are in.

I guess he earned his way into the majors by not being deemed valuable enough by the Twins to be worth a spot on their 40 man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Yes..you know the guy who the thread is about.  :)

But I’m talking about rule 5 guys in general.

Yeah, I guess I should have looked to see what thread I was in.

Bringing guys straight from A ball to the majors is far from ideal.   But that’s the way the rules are set up, so when you are trying to build depth in an organization by grabbing a decent prospect from another team, you do it even if you wouldn’t handle a similar player from your own organization that way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, I guess I should have looked to see what thread I was in.

Bringing guys straight from A ball to the majors is far from ideal.   But that’s the way the rules are set up, so when you are trying to build depth in an organization by grabbing a decent prospect from another team, you do it even if you wouldn’t handle a similar player from your own organization that way.  

I’m aware of why it’s done.

But the point remains the same.  We try to do everything we can to keep these marginal players on the ML roster, with little to no MiL experience, yet we are arguing over whether or not a 19 y/o tearing up A ball can move up a level.

The thought processes and principles aren’t consistent.  
 

Let’s put this another way.  I would get you could call up GRod and Adley today and they would be fine.  People would be scared to do that, especially with Rodriguez, but I’m guessing he could hold his own.  
 

I mean, Tyler Wells is holding his own (yes he is older but still), so I’m guessing Grayson could as well.

And yet, people Would probably freak out and say we are rushing Rodriguez.

And yes, I’m aware these are different players with different expectations but I’m talking about the basic principle of “rushing” (made up term).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m aware of why it’s done.

But the point remains the same.  We try to do everything we can to keep these marginal players on the ML roster, with little to no MiL experience, yet we are arguing over whether or not a 19 y/o tearing up A ball can move up a level.

The thought processes and principles aren’t consistent.  
 

Let’s put this another way.  I would get you could call up GRod and Adley today and they would be fine.  People would be scared to do that, especially with Rodriguez, but I’m guessing he could hold his own.  
 

I mean, Tyler Wells is holding his own (yes he is older but still), so I’m guessing Grayson could as well.

And yet, people Would probably freak out and say we are rushing Rodriguez.

And yes, I’m aware these are different players with different expectations but I’m talking about the basic principle of “rushing” (made up term).

The thought process from the team is consistent.

The way the fans justify the team's action less so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m aware of why it’s done.

But the point remains the same.  We try to do everything we can to keep these marginal players on the ML roster, with little to no MiL experience, yet we are arguing over whether or not a 19 y/o tearing up A ball can move up a level.

The thought processes and principles aren’t consistent.  
 

Let’s put this another way.  I would get you could call up GRod and Adley today and they would be fine.  People would be scared to do that, especially with Rodriguez, but I’m guessing he could hold his own.  
 

I mean, Tyler Wells is holding his own (yes he is older but still), so I’m guessing Grayson could as well.

And yet, people Would probably freak out and say we are rushing Rodriguez.

And yes, I’m aware these are different players with different expectations but I’m talking about the basic principle of “rushing” (made up term).

And my point is simply that bringing up Rodriguez now isn’t the ideal way to develop him or use his service time.   Do I think he’d survive the experience?   Sure.   I guarantee you that if he’d been subject to the Rule 5 draft some team would have claimed him.   Probably would have been first pick to go.   But I don’t think there’s any time inconsistency in putting one player in the majors because you have to, and not putting another guy in the majors because you don’t have to.    

Back to Wells, he’s certainly keeping his head above water and has a nice assortment of pitches.    He’s looking like a very good Rule 5 selection.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

And my point is simply that bringing up Rodriguez now isn’t the ideal way to develop him or use his service time.   Do I think he’d survive the experience?   Sure.   I guarantee you that if he’d been subject to the Rule 5 draft some team would have claimed him.   Probably would have been first pick to go.   But I don’t think there’s any time inconsistency in putting one player in the majors because you have to, and not putting another guy in the majors because you don’t have to.    

Back to Wells, he’s certainly keeping his head above water and has a nice assortment of pitches.    He’s looking like a very good Rule 5 selection.  
 

Why isn’t it the ideal way to develop him?

You notice I said him And not Hall because Hall is still wild at times.

Grayson, by all accounts, has great command, several good pitches, is mature, etc...why would it hurt his development to bring him to the majors today?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Why isn’t it the ideal way to develop him?

You notice I said him And not Hall because Hall is still wild at times.

Grayson, by all accounts, has great command, several good pitches, is mature, etc...why would it hurt his development to bring him to the majors today?  

It isn't that bit, it's the next bit.."or use his service time.".  Therein lies the rub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, with Rule 5 you have a chance to acquire a player from another team for free. At that point things like service time and the perfect player development trajectory aren't relevant. You grab the guy and try to make it work. Totally different situation than a top prospect like Rodriguez.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

I mean, with Rule 5 you have a chance to acquire a player from another team for free. At that point things like service time and the perfect player development trajectory aren't relevant. You grab the guy and try to make it work. Totally different situation than a top prospect like Rodriguez.

But if a player who is generally seen as less talented can be challenged in such a fashion and do well why not use that approach with Rodriguez and accelerate his advancement? 

The answer is simple, service time manipulation.

Do you think the team is better with Rodriguez on it?  Do you think it would help or hinder Rodrizuez's career?

It isn't as if we are talking about something unprecedented.  He's 21.  Tons of guys have been pitching in the majors by 21.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

But if a player who is generally seen as less talented can be challenged in such a fashion and do well why not use that approach with Rodriguez and accelerate his advancement? 

The answer is simple, service time manipulation.

Do you think the team is better with Rodriguez on it?  Do you think it would help or hinder Rodrizuez's career?

It isn't as if we are talking about something unprecedented.  He's 21.  Tons of guys have been pitching in the majors by 21.

 

Put it another way.

If a rule was in place that the player becomes a FA after their age 27 season, would we still be ok with GRod where he is now and waiting another year to bring him up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

Put it another way.

If a rule was in place that the player becomes a FA after their age 27 season, would we still be ok with GRod where he is now and waiting another year to bring him up?

Of course not. 

I'm actively rooting for the players next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Of course not. 

I'm actively rooting for the players next year.

That was a question addressed to the audience, not necessarily YOU.

This is one of the many things in sports where it has “always been done this way”, therefore people accept it, don’t question it and act like it’s how you have to do it.

If different rules were in place, people would think differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • HEY YANKEES! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnxNRPy_SOA
    • Yeah I'm all for sportsmanship but seeing 'Congratulations Yankees' at or near the top of the board is sickening, not gonna lie.  There is no high road when it comes to these clowns.  Boone's constant whining, the well-documented HP ump favoritism (I don't care if its framing or whatever, its happening, and its annoying AF), the whining about Judge getting hit on the hand while their guys constantly pitch inside including of course the Kjerstad play where they were literally cutting up on the bench as he lay prone on home plate, the ginormous payroll, the incredibly entitled fan base booing at pitches being called balls that are three inches off the plate, that stupid roll call, that stupid whistle after strikeouts, the stupid national media drooling over a Judge v Ohtani WS possibility, Nestor Cortes and his dumb mustache, the mediocre stadium that is revered simply because its called Yankee Stadium, the ridiculously short RF porch, the Soto Shuffle or whatever the hell it is. Congratulations my ass.  Screw those dudes.
    • Here's the deal. I doubt anyone on the Yankee's board congradulated us last year. This year they won the East. Whippie for them. It's like saying the IRS won tax season. IF, we do anything in the playoffs, we may meet again. But there are some significant hurdles before that. And they could easily lose along the way. Cleveland, Houston, Detroit, and KC are no walk in the park. I'll root for the O's to go as far as they can and that the Yankees are one and done. We are in. I hope we win one more so we play the opening round in Oriole Park. If not, we are still in and have to do what we got to do to go anywhere. Two years in a row. While the Red Sox, Blue Jays, and Tampa sleep. Year two with a heck of a lot more obstacles. This may not be a WS year but we are competitive, young, and a hell of a lot classier than that bunch in the Bronx. 
    • The usage of Cano last night was poor, I don't even blame him really.  Yankees had 9-1-2 coming up, and Torres is well known (based on the telecast) to hit Cano well, and hit sinkers well.  He laced that hit to RF off him on Tuesday where the Yanks screwed up the baserunning.  And Soto got a hit off him that same inning.  So it was pretty predictable that these guys were going to tee off when he came in, and that's exactly what happened. Not to mention he's pitched a lot recently, and Burnes should have pitched another inning anyway.  Just baffling decisions by Hyde last night, and I'm not one to generally question those types of things.  Even if the Burnes thing was pre-ordained, the choice of Cano for that moment was terrible.
    • Why is this thread on the Oriole Talk section.    It probably does not belong on the OriolesHangout  at all but if it stays it should be on the MLB section.
    • If there's two outs and its not Judge in the hole, I'm probably going with Perez, crossing my fingers he gets the lefty, and then starting fresh the next inning with Coulombe or someone else.  If there's one out, I'm going w/ Coulombe.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...