Jump to content

What do you think of Tyler Wells?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Just now, wildcard said:

Holt is back.   And Holt may feel that the level of competition that Grayson faces in more important right now then working with him everyday.  I don't know.  You will have to ask him.

Oh he is back?  I didn’t see that.  Good to know.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Development is, without question, impacted by service time.  If you say, a HS player is a FA 9 years after entering the organization and a college player is a FA 7 years after entering it, you better believe how they develop will change.

These “rules” on how they develop will change dramatically.  All of a sudden, getting guys through the system quicker will be what is done.  You better believe that.

Yes, I believe if they change the service time rules it will affect how teams handle players service time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s absolutely the singular driving force or, the overwhelming most important one.

Again, if they change the service time rules and they say a player becomes a FA at a certain age, the development will be different and guys will be in the majors much sooner.

How much difference do you think it will make?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Put it another way.

If a rule was in place that the player becomes a FA after their age 27 season, would we still be ok with GRod where he is now and waiting another year to bring him up?

 

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

That was a question addressed to the audience, not necessarily YOU.

This is one of the many things in sports where it has “always been done this way”, therefore people accept it, don’t question it and act like it’s how you have to do it.

If different rules were in place, people would think differently.

Agree...the two factors that impact this game the most are extending control as long as possible and where a team is regarding being competitive.  I do not fault the O's for using the rules, but the rules should be different.  And while I agree development for specific people and skill sets can and should vary, things would look much different if the rules were different. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Frobby said:

That said, I don’t think the Tyler Wells case tells us anything about Rodriguez    Wells has been a starting pitcher in the minors and he’s being used as a reliever on pace to throw 70 innings, mostly in low to medium leverage situations.     He’s holding his own in that role.   Would I want the O’s using Rodriguez in that role?    No, I’d much rather have him progressing through the minors as a starting pitcher.   To me that’s better training for his ultimate role than pitching in the Wells tole would be.    

You would think the group that loves to laugh at others for getting worked up over SSS wouldn’t use one relief outing from a rule 5 guy as evidence that Grayrod would be a productive big leaguer at the moment. I’m sort of dumbfounded how this has become a jumping off point for talking about him. Wells is a below average reliever and has more minor league experience than Rodriguez. The situations could not be more different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LTO's said:

You would think the group that loves to laugh at others for getting worked up over SSS wouldn’t use one relief outing from a rule 5 guy as evidence that Grayrod would be a productive big leaguer at the moment. I’m sort of dumbfounded how this has become a jumping off point for talking about him. Wells is a below average reliever and has more minor league experience than Rodriguez. The situations could not be more different.

Good thing no one is doing that but don’t let facts get in the way of things.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Major changes to how things are currently done, depending on what the new rules are.

I’d be very astounded if MLB ever agreed that players became FA at age 27.    The median age of a first-time free agent today (for players who haven’t been DFA or non-tendered) is significantly higher than that.   Even if MLB makes concessions here (which is no sure thing), they won’t be that dramatic.   That’s just too much of a giveaway for the owners to stomach it.   If they go to a flat age approach, the age they negotiate will be older than that.    

I did a post a couple of months ago about the typical age of player debuts over several decades.   I don’t recall the details exactly, but in the last 50 years it’s never been the case that the median player debuted at 21.  I will see if I can dig that up.   
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Good thing no one is doing that but don’t let facts get in the way of things.

 

"I mean, Tyler Wells is holding his own (yes he is older but still), so I’m guessing Grayson could as well."

24 innings with an over 5 FIP out of the bullpen in mostly low leverage situations. This is what you used as your justification for Grayson holding his own right now in the big leagues as a starter. Pretty laughable given your behavior in other threads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LTO's said:

"I mean, Tyler Wells is holding his own (yes he is older but still), so I’m guessing Grayson could as well."

24 innings with an over 5 FIP out of the bullpen in mostly low leverage situations. This is what you used as your justification for Grayson holding his own right now in the big leagues as a starter. Pretty laughable given your behavior in other threads. 

No, my justification for Grayson is that he is really good and could come up here and be fine imo.  If Wells was my justification, I would have also called for DL Hall but I specifically mentioned him and why I didn’t ask for him to be brought up.

As for Wells, he has had issues with the long ball but his K rate is very good, his walk rate is below 3, his xFIp is barely above 4, he is throwing strikes at an above average level and he is missing bats at an above average level.

So yea, I think he is holding his own.  In a SSS of innings for a reliever, a number like ERA can be very skewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s the post where I got into the data on the age of player debuts over time.   

You can look at the details, but the median debut was never lower than 23.5 in the last 70 years.   The number of players debuting at 21 or 22 has shrunk a lot, though.   It used to be that 25% of players debuted at 22 or earlier.   Now it’s down to under 10%.   So if you said a player reaches free agency after their age 27 season, that would mean that 90% of players would reach free agency earlier than they do now.   I don’t think the union will be able to push the owners that far.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the trade deadline, it will be a juicy push/pull to see if the team gives any of Adley/Bradish/Baumann/Hall/Rodriguez/Vavra/Smith a bigger chunk of the two months to get as much of the Ryan Mountcastle Adjustment Period (TM) out of the way before next year.

Rodriguez was the fourth High Schooler taken in the 2018 draft - the first three are all already at the highest level.

Hey, last time I googled for Carter Stewart Japan Stats I don't think I got a B-Ref page.   0.82 ERA seems kind of good.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=stewar004car

Stewart still might get that dig on Rodriguez a few years out of "My 2025 salary is $30M, how about you bro?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

In a SSS of innings for a reliever, a number like ERA can be very skewed.

In a SSS literally anything can be very skewed. You can point out that he's got good strikeout numbers and a low walk rate. I will point out that he's giving up home runs at double the league average. And again, these are for the most part, extremely low leverage situations. You either believe that SSS are pretty much worthless or you don't. It's fine to backtrack, but you absolutely were using Tyler Wells as a comparison to Rodriguez. That's foolish. I think Grayrod is a stellar prospect. But even the most ardent pro-player evaluators would balk at moving him into the big league rotation after only 6 starts above low A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • HEY YANKEES! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnxNRPy_SOA
    • Yeah I'm all for sportsmanship but seeing 'Congratulations Yankees' at or near the top of the board is sickening, not gonna lie.  There is no high road when it comes to these clowns.  Boone's constant whining, the well-documented HP ump favoritism (I don't care if its framing or whatever, its happening, and its annoying AF), the whining about Judge getting hit on the hand while their guys constantly pitch inside including of course the Kjerstad play where they were literally cutting up on the bench as he lay prone on home plate, the ginormous payroll, the incredibly entitled fan base booing at pitches being called balls that are three inches off the plate, that stupid roll call, that stupid whistle after strikeouts, the stupid national media drooling over a Judge v Ohtani WS possibility, Nestor Cortes and his dumb mustache, the mediocre stadium that is revered simply because its called Yankee Stadium, the ridiculously short RF porch, the Soto Shuffle or whatever the hell it is. Congratulations my ass.  Screw those dudes.
    • Here's the deal. I doubt anyone on the Yankee's board congradulated us last year. This year they won the East. Whippie for them. It's like saying the IRS won tax season. IF, we do anything in the playoffs, we may meet again. But there are some significant hurdles before that. And they could easily lose along the way. Cleveland, Houston, Detroit, and KC are no walk in the park. I'll root for the O's to go as far as they can and that the Yankees are one and done. We are in. I hope we win one more so we play the opening round in Oriole Park. If not, we are still in and have to do what we got to do to go anywhere. Two years in a row. While the Red Sox, Blue Jays, and Tampa sleep. Year two with a heck of a lot more obstacles. This may not be a WS year but we are competitive, young, and a hell of a lot classier than that bunch in the Bronx. 
    • The usage of Cano last night was poor, I don't even blame him really.  Yankees had 9-1-2 coming up, and Torres is well known (based on the telecast) to hit Cano well, and hit sinkers well.  He laced that hit to RF off him on Tuesday where the Yanks screwed up the baserunning.  And Soto got a hit off him that same inning.  So it was pretty predictable that these guys were going to tee off when he came in, and that's exactly what happened. Not to mention he's pitched a lot recently, and Burnes should have pitched another inning anyway.  Just baffling decisions by Hyde last night, and I'm not one to generally question those types of things.  Even if the Burnes thing was pre-ordained, the choice of Cano for that moment was terrible.
    • Why is this thread on the Oriole Talk section.    It probably does not belong on the OriolesHangout  at all but if it stays it should be on the MLB section.
    • If there's two outs and its not Judge in the hole, I'm probably going with Perez, crossing my fingers he gets the lefty, and then starting fresh the next inning with Coulombe or someone else.  If there's one out, I'm going w/ Coulombe.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...