Jump to content

Next man up on 2nd base carousel.


bpilktree

Recommended Posts

Wilkerson is not the answer which we knew but if you are not hitting you better field great.  I don’t care to keep trying guys like Rio, Wilkerson, or Valika that have no upside and have been given countless opportunities.  Let McCoy Jones or Lebya a chance put one at second give him 50 games to see how they do.  If they fail give the next guy a chance for the final 50 games.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Can any of the above show anything that makes you think they are the answer when the team is next competitive?

You don’t need a star at every position.  Look at every team and they have a position or two where they get nothing great for them.  The Red Sox have 3 pretty much full time starters that have 150+ at bats already.  Two of them are hitting under .200 and other hitting .219.  Their on base is not much better.  The Yankees picked up Urshela who was pretty much a garbage bin pickup and he turned into a piece with them.    If you get decent pitching have good offensive at most the positions you just need a guy that can make plays in field get a hit here and their so yes I think one of them has better chance to help a competitive team then the three guys we have sent out their this year.  What did John Means show in the minors that made you say yeah he will be a piece of a competitive team?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bpilktree said:

You don’t need a star at every position.  Look at every team and they have a position or two where they get nothing great for them.  The Red Sox have 3 pretty much full time starters that have 150+ at bats already.  Two of them are hitting under .200 and other hitting .219.  Their on base is not much better.  The Yankees picked up Urshela who was pretty much a garbage bin pickup and he turned into a piece with them.    If you get decent pitching have good offensive at most the positions you just need a guy that can make plays in field get a hit here and their so yes I think one of them has better chance to help a competitive team then the three guys we have sent out their this year.  What did John Means show in the minors that made you say yeah he will be a piece of a competitive team?  

I didn't say star.

I'm not certain any of the group you listed can put out a season above replacement level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt watch todays game, but Wilkerson is at least solid with the glove at 2B, something Jones is said not to be. McCoy's bat likely wont be any better than what we've seen here anyway. Ortiz and Grenier are still a year away at least. Vavra probably is too. Those three could possibly be mid season call ups next year.  I wouldnt be opposed to seeing that infield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lebya is a career .290 hitter and .367 obp in his minor league career.  He does not have a strong arm so is stuck at 2nd and the Diamondbacks had Marte so he didn’t have a spot.  If he came up through our system we would be praising his numbers and be screaming he was a piece for the future.  He has hit everywhere but never given chance at the majors for a period of time.  Long run we have other guys that can be more solid piece of the future teams long term like Westerburg, Harinez but he could hold fort down til they are ready.  The Dodgers did that at second base the last few years waiting for Lux to take over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Lebya is a career .290 hitter and .367 obp in his minor league career.  He does not have a strong arm so is stuck at 2nd and the Diamondbacks had Marte so he didn’t have a spot.  If he came up through our system we would be praising his numbers and be screaming he was a piece for the future.  He has hit everywhere but never given chance at the majors for a period of time.  Long run we have other guys that can be more solid piece of the future teams long term like Westerburg, Harinez but he could hold fort down til they are ready.  The Dodgers did that at second base the last few years waiting for Lux to take over.  

 

6 hours ago, OrioleDog said:

His 2019 AAA Reno 300/351/519 was a 92 in the Baseball Prospectus book's DRC+, which is basically their flavor of OPS+

Mountcastle's 2019 AAA Norfolk 312/344/527 was a 114.

That said, I have no qualms whatsoever about giving him some reps at Wilkerson or Valaika's expense this month.

Have to watch out for those park adjustments. 

A 92 at AAA doesn't scream piece of the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

 

Have to watch out for those park adjustments. 

A 92 at AAA doesn't scream piece of the future.

Your right keep throwing out Wilkerson, Valika Urias and Rio Ruiz.  Don’t give any these guys a chance that should help us in future.  He might not make it and none of them might but we sure won’t know have Wilkerson, Valika, and Ruiz playing in the majors.  
 

He hasn’t played every year in PCL either.  He hit at 21 in low A ball at 18.  He hit in A and AA as a 20 year old.  He has 2500 career at bats in minor leagues and about a 5th of those in PCL so he had to hit pretty good thought his rise up minors.  
 

Mountcastle is probably a top 10 prospect hitter if just looking at offense numbers  in all of baseball so comparing the two is stupid.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Your right keep throwing out Wilkerson, Valika Urias and Rio Ruiz.  Don’t give any these guys a chance that should help us in future.  He might not make it and none of them might but we sure won’t know have Wilkerson, Valika, and Ruiz playing in the majors.  
 

He hasn’t played every year in PCL either.  He hit at 21 in low A ball at 18.  He hit in A and AA as a 20 year old.  He has 2500 career at bats in minor leagues and about a 5th of those in PCL so he had to hit pretty good thought his rise up minors.  
 

Mountcastle is probably a top 10 prospect hitter if just looking at offense numbers  in all of baseball so comparing the two is stupid.  

I don't have an issue with switching out the chairs on the Titanic.  But I don't think you are going to find a Coup De Ville in the bottom of a Cracker Jack Box.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bpilktree said:

Lebya is a career .290 hitter and .367 obp in his minor league career.  He does not have a strong arm so is stuck at 2nd and the Diamondbacks had Marte so he didn’t have a spot.  If he came up through our system we would be praising his numbers and be screaming he was a piece for the future.  He has hit everywhere but never given chance at the majors for a period of time.  Long run we have other guys that can be more solid piece of the future teams long term like Westerburg, Harinez but he could hold fort down til they are ready.  The Dodgers did that at second base the last few years waiting for Lux to take over.  

Leyla is a career .149 MLB hitter. Lots of guys hit in the minors and can’t in the majors. The only person blocking him is him. He’s a nobody.

Wilkerson made an error today but has been playing well over all. He is worth 2 OAA so far, whereas Mr Galvis is minus 5, so let’s not call for Stevie’s head just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Philip said:

Leyla is a career .149 MLB hitter. Lots of guys hit in the minors and can’t in the majors. The only person blocking him is him. He’s a nobody.

Wilkerson made an error today but has been playing well over all. He is worth 2 OAA so far, whereas Mr Galvis is minus 5, so let’s not call for Stevie’s head just yet.

Yeah, in like 60 at bats over two seasons. Might want to give him a little more of a chance before we decide he can't hit in the majors (although I doubt his abilities, too)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Yeah, in like 60 at bats over two seasons. Might want to give him a little more of a chance before we decide he can't hit in the majors (although I doubt his abilities, too)

Oh I agree totally, im just saying that he hasn’t shown anything yet, and no reason to get too enthusiastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...