Jump to content

MASN Access Elias piece this evening


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

 

A primary source for much of the Roch/Connolly/Meoli/Trezza, etc. stuff that will come out this weekend.

Somebody did ask him a tough-ish followup to gain the info BAL is paying Galvis' roster bonus.

Burch, he lauded a stuff jump after shutdown.   Minors injury rundown, was my first time hearing it is turf toe for Yusniel, and Servideo recently had hernia surgery 4-6 extra weeks of sideline.   Vavra he did give specific of about 10 days away from rehab games, and that Fall Ball probably in his future for catch up.

Rutschman, he cited "long AAA" season as part of the gameplan.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My read is that he thinks we are close. He wants good players on roster for next year.  This upcoming offseason is going to be very interesting.  Folks should be happy he kept our guys.  Will be cool to look back on today in 5 years with all the wild moves.  A lot of teams sold the farm and hamstrung themselves down the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

My read is that he thinks we are close. He wants good players on roster for next year.  This upcoming offseason is going to be very interesting.  Folks should be happy he kept our guys.  Will be cool to look back on today in 5 years with all the wild moves.  A lot of teams sold the farm and hamstrung themselves down the line. 

For every team that sold the farm a team that wasn't the O's reaped the benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

For every team that sold the farm a team that wasn't the O's reaped the benefits.

Who would you have traded?  Pretty tough when your best chips are under control for a long time.  Imagine they asked appropriate value.   
 

I think they move Mancini over winter.  Means has something to prove in next 2 months.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Who would you have traded?  Pretty tough when your best chips are under control for a long time.  Imagine they asked appropriate value.   
 

I think they move Mancini over winter.  Means has something to prove in next 2 months.  
 

Santander last year.

I agree the market for Means and Mancini were depressed.  I was just counter pointing the idea that teams were buying high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Santander last year.

I agree the market for Means and Mancini were depressed.  I was just counter pointing the idea that teams were buying high.

I agree it was painful to sit on sidelines during fireworks, but I think it was the prudent move.  Santander was a missed opportunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, emmett16 said:

My read is that he thinks we are close. He wants good players on roster for next year.  This upcoming offseason is going to be very interesting.  Folks should be happy he kept our guys.  Will be cool to look back on today in 5 years with all the wild moves.  A lot of teams sold the farm and hamstrung themselves down the line. 

The offseason will be interesting. IMO, they have to invest $10M to $15M in FA signings if you want any hope of turning things around anytime soon. 

Obviously you shouldn't trade Fry, Scott, Sulser, etc unless you get a good offer. But if you're not going to participate in the trade market, you have to invest in some FA's. Or you have to understand that player development is going to be a long, long process. 

I think it's reasonable to expect some FA investments this offseason at a higher market rate, meaning $3M and $4M signings instead of $1M signings. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

The offseason will be interesting. IMO, they have to invest $10M to $15M in FA signings if you want any hope of turning things around anytime soon. 

Obviously you shouldn't trade Fry, Scott, Sulser, etc unless you get a good offer. But if you're not going to participate in the trade market, you have to invest in some FA's. Or you have to understand that player development is going to be a long, long process. 

I think it's reasonable to expect some FA investments this offseason at a higher market rate, meaning $3M and $4M signings instead of $1M signings. 

I’m right there, too.  This off-season is going to be interesting/telling.  The milestone elephant is 14 months out and I think that plays heavy.  He held onto his guys.   Money “frees up” in 2023.  He could make a statement this off-season, but it’s likely he’s playing for next.  I’m excited to see how roster shakes out for spring training 2022.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I’m right there, too.  This off-season is going to be interesting/telling.  The milestone elephant is 14 months out and I think that plays heavy.  He held onto his guys.   Money “frees up” in 2023.  He could make a statement this off-season, but it’s likely he’s playing for next.  I’m excited to see how roster shakes out for spring training 2022.  

If they bring back essentially "this roster" for Opening Day, Severino is replaced with a defense only catcher, Stewart, Franco, Valdez gone, with the only FA signings being a Franco equivalent third baseman and say Matt Harvey and Lopez or equivalents brought back, would you feel good about that?

You'd reasonably expect Rutschman after his early season "polishing" is finished, maybe Neustrom and Jones start the year with the O's. You could expect some bounce back from one of Akin, Lowther, or Kremer. Maybe Zimmerman finishes this year where you feel good about him. Rodriguez and Baumann up by the end of May/early June.

Would that be enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

If they bring back essentially "this roster" for Opening Day, Severino is replaced with a defense only catcher, Stewart, Franco, Valdez gone, with the only FA signings being a Franco equivalent third baseman and say Matt Harvey and Lopez or equivalents brought back, would you feel good about that?

You'd reasonably expect Rutschman after his early season "polishing" is finished, maybe Neustrom and Jones start the year with the O's. You could expect some bounce back from one of Akin, Lowther, or Kremer. Maybe Zimmerman finishes this year where you feel good about him. Rodriguez and Baumann up by the end of May/early June.

Would that be enough?

I’d like a solid FA SP acquisition on a short deal to help Means welcome the young pitchers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I’d like a solid FA SP acquisition on a short deal to help Means welcome the young pitchers.  

Agreed. 

But I think there needs to be more invested, adding a solid reliever and infielder. Hopefully 2 starters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I’m guessing it’s #3. I was a bit worried about #4, but if that was the case, don’t think that Suarez would be pitching today. 
    • Are you OK with context independent batting inputs that are used in WAR?  It feels like pitching and hitting should be symmetrical in terms of how they factor in sequencing.   FRV is definitely better than DRS for outfielders, as @tangotiger convincingly argues here.  For infielders, it’s more debatable, especially 1B where only DRS accounts for picks. By the way, Fangraphs WAR leaderboard allows you to toggle between FIP, RA9, and a 50/50 mix.  Cowser beats Gil regardless of the approach.
    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...