Jump to content

Lowball history of the Orioles since 2000


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Not a big fan of this thread at all. Teams start with lower offers ALL THE TIME - and it is really ignorant to claim otherwise.

Even in the Os recent history, we started off low with Mora and Huff and received a reduced asking price. The Vlad example is twisted ridiculously - "tell us what it takes to sign you in orange and black" (???) - when does that happen in early negotations. Didn't Jason Schmidt ask us to stop bidding on him? Pretty much the same with Richie Sexson ... What good would that question have done in those situations? And with 30 teams out there, do you really think we would identify a "must-have" free agent and not have a few other teams say the same question with their team colors to the same guy?

The posts in this thread imply that recent LT deals with players like Sizemore and Bonderman took place over a five minute period while waiting in line at Starbucks with no resistance whatsoever from management - or imply that our FO should show little resistance in such cases.

Frobby and Drungo post the best stuff out there, IMO, but this thread is a head-scratcher to me.

I am not saying we have lowballed every player we've ever gone after. I don't feel we lowballed Derek Lee, or Carlos Lee for that matter. I don't feel we lowballed Richie Sexson. We certainly didn't lowball Paul Konerko.

But the players we have lowballed, as identified in my original post, were stupid guys to lowball. And I understand you don't want to make an initial offer that is the highest you are willing to go, but when you make an offer that significantly and obviously undervalues the player compared to his peers, you insult him and that's not a good way to negotiate.

Now I will give one caveat here -- I was reacting to what Peace21 posted about Bedard and we don't have any specifics on him. But, the version he gave is pretty darned plausible given the Orioles' past tactics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Where are the rumors and gossip about the Orioles slapping down a check in front of a star player and saying "what'll it take to put you in Orange and Black?" There aren't any.

Albert Belle ;)

As far as lowballing Bedard, no offense to Peace or his contact, but until we start hearing it from people with O's connections or from reporters, I won't believe it.

Plus, you always low ball when it comes to negotiations. Thats how it works. You go under and the player oges over and then you work to meet somewhere in the middle. The Orioles could throw down 5 year/60 mil and Bedard will immediatly come back with a higher number.

I wouldn't count the Mussina negotions as a fault of the O's. As I remember, Mussina told Angelos he would let the Orioles counter offer the Yanks and then never came back after visiting NY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles offer guaranteed that Vlad wouldn't sign here. If they'd opened with a killer offer I'd bet he'd have listened, and maybe actually signed. At least they'd have driven up the price. Worst case they overpay for a superstar... ooohh, that would have been terrible, wouldn't it?

The Orioles basically went to the BMW dealer, saw a $75,000 M5 that had been on the lot for a couple months. They offered the salesman $40k. The guy rolled his eyes and said "I'll call you back." After another month no call. The Orioles response? "Screw that guy, he doesn't want to sell the car." The salesman knew he had a quality product, and eventually someone would pay a lot closer to sticker.

This is just plain WRONG and you are twisting the facts to make your argument. The truth is we got Miggy the SAME year that the Vladdy offer was on the table. Miggy's deal was a shock around the league because of the fact that we got him at such a reduced rate. In your argument, why didn't Miggy's low offer "guarantee that he wouldn't sign here" either? We had the best deal on the table for Vladdy, and he turned it down. PERIOD!

As for Delgado...we definitely would have gotten him had we added to the paycheck. No doubt there we lowballed him.

Ryan COULD have been signed on the cheap the year before his free agency, but the O's took a chance and lost on that one. Had we given him the contract and then he came out and BOMBED as closer, you all would have crucified the FO for that as well. Remember that WAS his first season closing.

The one that really gets my goat that I cannot defend in any way shape or form is Moose. I get into arguments with Mrs. D all the time about this because Moose was LOWBALLED by Angelos, yet Moose gets all the grief from O's fan. PA certainly screwed up there. Moose should have been our 2nd Palmer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No... that just proves that the Orioles have no problem spending a little bit of money, even if it's on a mediocre player. Where they almost always balk is in signing true star talent to market rate deals.

A great model for team development is to maximize the number of sub-$1M players, sign a fair number of big stars, and save by rarely dipping into the treacherous waters of mid-range, declining free agents. The Orioles build their "foundation" with a large number of those players, most of whom are in decline or have already bottomed out.

I think we have the makings of a Grand Unifying Theory of Everything here.

The fundamental problem is that Angelos is a union guy (AFL-CIO, not MLBPA) who takes a union mindset to building a team. His ideal team is a bunch of old guys who all make about the same salary. He doesn't want to pay big stars a lot of money because that would create inequality and resentment. He believes in rewarding loyalty and longevity above performance. He believes that young players should have to pay their dues before getting a chance, unless they have some personal or ethnic connection (like being Greek) that exalts them to favored status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have the makings of a Grand Unifying Theory of Everything here.

The fundamental problem is that Angelos is a union guy (AFL-CIO, not MLBPA) who takes a union mindset to building a team. His ideal team is a bunch of old guys who all make about the same salary. He doesn't want to pay big stars a lot of money because that would create inequality and resentment. He believes in rewarding loyalty and longevity above performance. He believes that young players should have to pay their dues before getting a chance, unless they have some personal or ethnic connection (like being Greek) that exalts them to favored status.

Interesting theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thread Frobby.

It amazes me how many naive people there still are on this board.

The benefit of the doubt this piss poor organization is given is mind boggling to me.

The Orioles organization has certainly been dysfunctional and deserves most of the criticism it receives. But it also amazes me how every move that one disagrees with is spun to try and make the Orioles look as bad as possible.

One of the primary examples of lowballing a player is from the same year that we completely blew everyone elses offer for a former MVP shortstop. The Orioles offer for Vladdie was as good if not better than other offers received. He made it perfectly clear by refusing to meet w/the front office and later by the statements about wanting to be closer to a hispanic community that Baltimore was not a good fit for him. Yet to this day we ignore all that and spin it as if only the O's hadn't lowballed him w/their original offer he'd be an Oriole today. With all due respect that it total and complete BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles organization has certainly been dysfunctional and deserves most of the criticism it receives. But it also amazes me how every move that one disagrees with is spun to try and make the Orioles look as bad as possible.

One of the primary examples of lowballing a player is from the same year that we completely blew everyone elses offer for a former MVP shortstop. The Orioles offer for Vladdie was as good if not better than other offers received. He made it perfectly clear by refusing to meet w/the front office and later by the statements about wanting to be closer to a hispanic community that Baltimore was not a good fit for him. Yet to this day we ignore all that and spin it as if only the O's hadn't lowballed him w/their original offer he'd be an Oriole today. With all due respect that it total and complete BS.

I disagree. All it showed was that the Orioles had the best offer on the table because no one else wanted him. There was no competition. Do you honestly believe that if anyone else wanted Tejada the Orioles would have gotten him? Detroit and Seattle flirted with Tejada but none of them were serious. Ironically, Seattle is in second place and fighting for a Wild Card and Detroit was in the WS last year. I wonder if Tejada is wishing he took less to play for those teams and a chance to compete.

Anyway, what I am trying to say is, once another team showed interest in Guerrero he was gone. The Orioles didn't have a chance with competition because A) They suck, and B) they wouldn't raise their offer to get him.

If they really wanted him... they could have raised the offer and made it almost impossible for him to go elsewhere. I blame the Orioles for that.

As usual, they thought it better to save a couple million rather than sign one of the best players in the game. Shame on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line on Vlad was that the orioles didn't offer him enough to make him come here.

We know he asked for 7/105 to counter the 6/78 offer...So, he was willing to come here but wanted to get paid a lot more.

We should have countered for 6/90.

If we would have done that and he still said no, then i would agree.

But we didn't, so we will never truly know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Lee. The Orioles and Lee had a 3yr/27 deal worked out after agreeing to send Dave Crouthers, who no longer is in baseball I believe, and Val Majewski to the Marlins. Angelos balked at the contract extension. It fell apart and Lee became a Cub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Lee. The Orioles and Lee had a 3yr/27 deal worked out after agreeing to send Dave Crouthers, who no longer is in baseball I believe, and Val Majewski to the Marlins. Angelos balked at the contract extension. It fell apart and Lee became a Cub.
What a deal that would have been for the Orioles!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Lee. The Orioles and Lee had a 3yr/27 deal worked out after agreeing to send Dave Crouthers, who no longer is in baseball I believe, and Val Majewski to the Marlins. Angelos balked at the contract extension. It fell apart and Lee became a Cub.

Sometimes I think it'd be best if Peter Angelos had never decided to dabble in baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...