Jump to content

Dustin Pedroia Wins AL MVP


Tank

Recommended Posts

Markakis not getting a single vote is silly. I have a feeling OldFan is gonna start a thread soon.

Tex getting 1 point just baffles me. They vote for Manny but not him? Apparently your contributions don't matter at all if the rest of your team is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Evan Grant from the Dallas Morning News left Pedroia off his ballot entirely.

I don't care how you feel about Dustin Pedroia; if you leave the eventual winner totally off your ballot, you should be beaten about the ears with your own shoes and then have your voting privileges revoked. Writers trying to make "statements" with these ballots is like whispering into a hurricane. Just stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's harmless and good for the game. We just need someone who can give it back to him and actually back it up with performance. Kind of like Kevin Millar but 3 times better.

But he's a di--well, you know. I wouldn't like him if he were on my team, just as wouldn't like Manny Ramirez if he played with the Os. I'd gladly take their contributions, but not their attitudes.

Pedroia is good ball player, which separate from being a good guy. That being said, I'd have gone with Mauer. I think the Baseball Crank makes a good case for Mauer http://www.baseballcrank.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people on here are letting their Red Sox/Pedroia hate get in the way. I think Pedroia was certainly deserving, regardless of how annoying people find him.

.326/.376/.493, 17HR, 20SB/1CS (95%) from 2B. 6 errors all season. That's an excellent season, any way you slice it.

JTrea, I'd be interested in your argument for Mauer and Morneau.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people think Pedroia was a bad choice? I thought he was very deserving. I think Sizemore and Mauer were reasonable picks too' date=' but if I had a vote it would have been for Pedroia. I'm just glad Morneau didn't win. That would have been a joke.[/quote']

Nah, unfortunately he's a defensible pick. He's just so damn insufferable. :angryfire:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people think Pedroia was a bad choice? I thought he was very deserving. I think Sizemore and Mauer were reasonable picks too' date=' but if I had a vote it would have been for Pedroia. I'm just glad Morneau didn't win. That would have been a joke.[/quote']

I thought he was a decent choice. Probably should have gone to Mauer or Sizemore or even Cliff Lee, but Pedroia is defensible. Much better than the BBWAA's normal "we'll just give it to the guy with the RBIs" choice.

Markakis not getting a single vote is silly. I have a feeling OldFan is gonna start a thread soon.

Tex getting 1 point just baffles me. They vote for Manny but not him? Apparently your contributions don't matter at all if the rest of your team is good.

You don't win the MVP award on two months. It would be hard to be the MVP in 200 PAs if you hit .500/.750/1.000 and played Ozzie Smith defense.

Dumb people voting for Manny doesn't justify dumb people voting for Teixeira.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some people on here are letting their Red Sox/Pedroia hate get in the way. I think Pedroia was certainly deserving, regardless of how annoying people find him.

.326/.376/.493, 17HR, 20SB/1CS (95%) from 2B. 6 errors all season. That's an excellent season, any way you slice it.

JTrea, I'd be interested in your argument for Mauer and Morneau.

Yea it is a great season.

.328 /.413 /.451 from a catcher. That is a better season.

Morneau had like all the RBI on his team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought he was a decent choice. Probably should have gone to Mauer or Sizemore or even Cliff Lee, but Pedroia is defensible. Much better than the BBWAA's normal "we'll just give it to the guy with the RBIs" choice.

You don't win the MVP award on two months. It would be hard to be the MVP in 200 PAs if you hit .500/.750/1.000 and played Ozzie Smith defense.

Dumb people voting for Manny doesn't justify dumb people voting for Teixeira.

I didn't say it's WRONG, I just said it baffles me how the BBWAA is so inconsistent, and it's annoying how the voters seem to hand out so many extra points to a player if the rest of his team hasn't done well.

Anyway, this was posted on the Minor League Ball board about Utley, and I think it's a good point:

Utley...

Who was better than Pedroia in every measure offensively and was off-the-charts better defensively finished 15th in NL MVP voting.

Pedroia finishes 1st in the AL.

Am I taking crazy pills?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dumb people voting for Manny doesn't justify dumb people voting for Teixeira.

Or for Sabathia, dominating pitcher that he was down the stretch. You shouldn't even qualify for consideration playing only half a season or less for your team. Production with a different team or in a different league shouldn't count; we're talking about contributions to the season that your team compiled. Wins in April count just as much in the standings as those in September, even though the criticality of the latter games is more apparent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people think Pedroia was a bad choice? I thought he was very deserving. I think Sizemore and Mauer were reasonable picks too' date=' but if I had a vote it would have been for Pedroia. I'm just glad Morneau didn't win. That would have been a joke.[/quote']

Pedroia was a bad choice because his numbers were inflated by Fenway Park. All he did this year was become an expert in hitting lazy fly balls off the Monster and cruising into 2nd. During away games he was about as good as Mora or Roberts, which isn't terrible but it aint no MVP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evan Grant from the Dallas Morning News left Pedroia off his ballot entirely.

I don't care how you feel about Dustin Pedroia; if you leave the eventual winner totally off your ballot, you should be beaten about the ears with your own shoes and then have your voting privileges revoked. Writers trying to make "statements" with these ballots is like whispering into a hurricane. Just stop.

I disagree completely. If there is a guy you think is going to win and you think he is undeserving, you should give him zero of your votes. That isn't a statement, it's just smart. Quite frankly, the fact that more writers don't do this in the MVP and CY votes is baffling to me. Maybe I'm too cynical and they just pure, good-hearted baseball fans. Or maybe they're dumb, which seems more likely.

To illustrate, let's say you have a political race where there are 5 candidates running for 3 seats. You really want 2 of the candidates to win but don't care about the third. You would have to be a complete idiot to cast the third vote. This is a little different because you have to rank your choices, but it's the same principle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree completely. If there is a guy you think is going to win and you think he is undeserving, you should give him zero of your votes. That isn't a statement, it's just smart. Quite frankly, the fact that more writers don't do this in the MVP and CY votes is baffling to me. Maybe I'm too cynical and they just pure, good-hearted baseball fans. Or maybe they're dumb, which seems more likely.

No, it's not smart, because that's not the way the voting system works. If Grant was thinking that way, he should have just written down one or two names so the ones he thought were just filler weren't given additional votes. Instead, he filled out all 10 and omitted Pedroia. You (generic "you") rank your top 10 choices. If you leave Dustin Pedroia out, you did not think he was in the top 10 of the AL, or you are vindictive because you don't like his big mouth or the B on his hat. Leaving him out for the first reason means you know nothing about evaluating baseball players. Leaving him out for the second reason means you are juvenile and petty. Neither one is becoming. Leaving him entirely off so he gets NO points is indeed making a statement: I don't like this guy, so I'm going to sabotage him. If you think he was THAT undeserving, then there is still something wrong with you, because he wasn't. Heck, Grant was just on WEEI and even he now seems to think he's stupid.

Edit: Sorry for the strong tone, for some reason this issue has me hot under the collar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Honestly, this almost feels like a positive. Last year an outing like this might have had 4 or 5 walks. Hopefully this indicates a better ability to grind out a start without his best command. 
    • Yea that’s a lot of pitching.  Only 1 walk but the str% was just under 60%.
    • A few ideas:  McKenna has been around for a long time, Roch probably knows him pretty well.   Maybe he likes the guy.  It is a fact that Hyde (and likely Elias too) like to have a good mix of RH and LH bats, and take LH/RH splits very seriously.    We see it in their lineups, and in player moves, all the time.   It is clear based on the multitude of comments that come out each time a lineup is posted, that Hyde/Elias put a lot more stock in LH/RH splits than the majority of fans here do.   Whether you agree with them or not, the bottom line is it DOES matter to THEM, a lot.   And with Hays down, and now Burdick gone, our MLB/AAA pool of potential outfielders is VERY lefthanded, which means that McKenna probably has more value to them than he does in most our minds.   And Roch is just reflecting that value in his blog.   (When Hays got hurt, I wasn't 100% sure his replacement was going to be Kjerstad, I thought there was a chance, based on past behavior of Elias/Hyde, that it could be McKenna to get another RH bat in the mix). Perhaps Cowser has, or will, convince them that he can be an adequate backup CF if something happens to Mullins.   I don't know if that has happened yet.   But with Hays out, and Mateo so far not passing the eye test as a CF, it's possible that McKenna is still the #1 answer if something were to happen to Cedric.   Which gives him more significance than some other 4A guy who can be DFA'd 3 times in a season like Banuelos and pass through waivers or be easily replaced.
    • We smashed him pretty good last year and he’s due for regression. He’s an average pitcher that we should beat. 
    • Yeah, the limited IP so far is small.  But it feels like he's not at the right level of competition. Of course it's also as much competing against himself (pitch shape, location, etc. that the team tracks) as against the hitters too.  Like you mentioned elsewhere, he's younger than DeLeon.
    • I think they’d go with 4 lefties before sending Akin to AAA. If everyone is healthy: SP: Burnes, Grayson, Bradish, Kremer, Means/Irvin RP: Kimbrel, Cano, Coulombe, Perez, Akin, Suárez, Webb/Baumann, Irvin/Means Option: Wells, Tate DFA: Ramirez, Baumann/Webb And then if they want Wells, they either DFA the other of Webb/Baumann or option Akin.  They also have the ability to option Kremer, but he’s really have to pitch poorly for that to happen.
    • With Cowser hitting lefties ok so far, not a lot of reason for McKenna. Mateo has already played CF once as well, so they are covered down with defense in CF and Kjerstad brings a much better bat. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...