Jump to content

Prospect for prospect trade


PaulBako

Recommended Posts

Kinda interesting deal...

Depends on whos scouts you trust the most.

Most people in Texas don't think Mayberry will ever get on base enough to play everyday. Most Philly fans think the Golson will never hit the breaking stuff and will be a 4th/5th OF and pinch runner.

Philly fans are looking at Mayberry jr. as a masher for platoon time vs. LHP, which he excelled at this season but was horrible in 07.

Texas fans are looking at Golson as a guy that even though he strikes out a ton, still had a OBP of .337 in AA last year.

Golson has the higher potential and and hard position to fill defensively and is 2 years younger but is at the lower development level.

I call it a push or a slight win to Texas depending on how much you like Golson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the deal more for Texas, though neither is setting the world afire. Both have time to straighten themselves out. As lax pointed out, Golson gets the nod for me due to tools and position. Mayberry still looks scary at times out there. As an aside, we covered Mayberry in our Texas Top 20 prospects list. Here's what we had to say (sorry for formating, it doesn't lend itself well to cutting and pasting :)):

16. John Mayberry, Jr. | Stats | Depot Grade: B

6-6 / 230 | Age - 25 | OF | B/T - R/R | Drafted - 2005 (R1s) | Stanford University

Floor: AAAA | Ceiling: Above-AVG OF | Projection: AVG OF

Notes: Mayberry's longish swing limits his contact rate and the ability for his huge raw power to play-up (potential fringe-plus-plus). He has the arm for RF but still struggles at times with his routes and tracking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the deal more for Texas, though neither is setting the world afire. Both have time to straighten themselves out. As lax pointed out, Golson gets the nod for me due to tools and position. Mayberry still looks scary at times out there. As an aside, we covered Mayberry in our Texas Top 20 prospects list. Here's what we had to say (sorry for formating, it doesn't lend itself well to cutting and pasting :)):

16. John Mayberry, Jr. | Stats | Depot Grade: B

6-6 / 230 | Age - 25 | OF | B/T - R/R | Drafted - 2005 (R1s) | Stanford University

Floor: AAAA | Ceiling: Above-AVG OF | Projection: AVG OF

Notes: Mayberry's longish swing limits his contact rate and the ability for his huge raw power to play-up (potential fringe-plus-plus). He has the arm for RF but still struggles at times with his routes and tracking.

Your Texas top 20 got linked to Lonestarball.com. Excellent work man, I know a lot of work goes into those. Where do you get your scouting info? Is it first hand or second hand scouting reports?

For what its worth most of the Texas prospect gurus had Mayberry in the 25-30 range with Golson being a slight uprade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your Texas top 20 got linked to Lonestarball.com. Excellent work man, I know a lot of work goes into those. Where do you get your scouting info? Is it first hand or second hand scouting reports?

For what its worth most of the Texas prospect gurus had Mayberry in the 25-30 range with Golson being a slight uprade.

Thanks. If it's anything like the OH, I'm sure they tore the list apart! ;)

Anyway, I watch a bunch of minor league ball and do my best to see as many prospects as I can. In addition, I rely on various scouting services that I consider "legit" in order to fill in the holes. When I can't see a prospect in person or on video, I tend to be more conservative. That's really it.

Mayberry could have ended up anywhere from where he was (I think around 17?) to the "Next 10" list which wasn't in any order. He swings and misses a lot, but I still love his tool set. Plus arm (though he's scary tracking the ball sometimes) and fringe-plus-plus raw power. If it all comes together he could be a beast. I think he ends up carving out a career producing as an average everyday player.

I agree Golson is an upgrade -- I like the deal for TEX, though it isn't a "steal" I don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Soto has been fine since his first couple appearances and appears to be picking up steam. That makes seven. Problem is Cano has been the most reliable and all of a sudden looked terrible twice in a row. Hopefully he can get in one decent appearance in the final series.
    • So It's 13 pitchers for the Wild card round? What position player are you dropping?
    • There have been 2-3 times when it seemed logical to call him up but they don’t.   I’ve never understood this thing they have for Baker.  Hey, Cole Irvin is available again!!
    • While we lost some talented players, I think the consensus was some of the players we lost were actually blocking more talented prospects. The loss of Westburg and Urias should have been mostly offset by Holliday and Mayo. Instead, they were truly abysmal.  Povich had some nice moments but he was disappointing as well.  Maybe our expectations were too high - Elias is not going to hit on every prospect, and even the ones that turn out good may take a while to adjust. Still, I think it is fair to have expected more out of Mayo and Holliday since the organization deemed them ready to promote.  In addition to the prospects, you had Adley hit a wall, going from a 6 WAR pace to replacement level, and Cowser and O'Hearn both struggling.  Certainly injuries hurt us, but we should have been strong enough to overcome them. Maybe not to sustain a 105 win pace but I think it is fair to say we should have been able to beat 95 wins and win the division even with the injuries.  
    • I was wondering what the knee-jerk reaction would be to an ugly game last night, but the truth is that the bullpen is fine, as is the rest of the team. We lack a true lockdown closer, but we have six arms by my count that are very good relievers in Akin, Perez, Coulombe, Webb, Cano, and Domingez. And you can add Suarez to that list next week, and possibly Povich, who should also make the PS roster as a lefty long relief option to mirror Suarez. Anyway, that game could have and would have gone much differently, IMO, if it were a playoff game. Burnes obviously stays in longer and gets at least through the top of the order if not back down to the bottom third to hand it over to the bullpen. Hopefully we'd be able to scratch out some runs, but that's not the bullpen's fault.  This is an extremely good team with a lead. Let's hope we get on the board early and often starting tonight.
    • Boy, Brandon Young who has some decent numbers at Norfolk must be injured or unimpressive to the front office to not even get a look for this bullpen. Bryan Baker is almost a waste of a call up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...