Jump to content

The Mullins market


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

When was the last time a guy ranked in the top 3 on prospect lists was part of a trade?

Austin Martin was pretty highly ranked.  Moancada was highly ranked when he was traded.   I don’t expect Mullins to draw a prospect of that caliber.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

IMO, I think Elias is trying to architect this rebuild - or whatever you want to call it- by doing it from the minor leagues and prospects stockpiled by our own resources (draft and development) and minor trades.

I don't get the feeling that he's going to move a star player for additional pieces.  He's traded guys like Bundy and Villar and Cashner, guys that are somewhat decent but he's not traded someone who some could consider a cornerstone piece in order to diversify talent. 

This kind of ties in with the narrative here about wondering if Elias can really be an MLB GM.  I don't think anyone here would want to argue with the work he's done in setting up a South American presence and his drafts are pretty positive from where I sit

But is he a guy that can swing a trade of a major piece in order to pick up additional pieces?  Remains to be seen.  

I agree with all this except the South American part.  

What Continent is the Dominican Republic In? - WorldAtlas

Jul 25, 2018 — The Dominican Republic is considered part of the North American continent, and it is among the most visited nations in the Caribbean.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wildcard - whether or not you believe generally that players are affected by “lineup protection,” I don’t think it really applies to Mullins.   He’s at the top of the lineup and nobody really pitches around the leadoff hitter, especially one who’s a base stealing threat.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have said, anyone is available at the right price.

What is odd to me is there seems to be a direct correlation between the people who are upset that we aren't better RIGHT THIS SECOND and the people who are willing to trade our best players RIGHT THIS SECOND.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Wildcard - whether or not you believe generally that players are affected by “lineup protection,” I don’t think it really applies to Mullins.   He’s at the top of the lineup and nobody really pitches around the leadoff hitter, especially one who’s a base stealing threat.  

Does he hit better or worse with guys on base?  Most guys hit better with guys on base.  Because most pitchers are worse with guys on base.

Seems pretty logical to suggest that more guys on base would lead to better offensive performances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Wildcard - whether or not you believe generally that players are affected by “lineup protection,” I don’t think it really applies to Mullins.   He’s at the top of the lineup and nobody really pitches around the leadoff hitter, especially one who’s a base stealing threat.  

Ah, but if Mateo turns out to bat 9th so he is back to back with Mullins and he hits well he could have Mullins see more fastballs because Mateo being on base and a threat to steal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pickles said:

As others have said, anyone is available at the right price.

What is odd to me is there seems to be a direct correlation between the people who are upset that we aren't better RIGHT THIS SECOND and the people who are willing to trade our best players RIGHT THIS SECOND.

If I thought the 2022 team had a chance to be competitive I wouldn't be in favor of moving Mullins.

However Elias has planned this rebuild in such a way that they won't be.

If the window doesn't open until 2024 moving Mullins makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If I thought the 2022 team had a chance to be competitive I wouldn't be in favor of moving Mullins.

However Elias has planned this rebuild in such a way that they won't be.

If the window doesn't open until 2024 moving Mullins makes sense.

So when did you come to the conclusion that the 2022  team had no chance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pickles said:

So when did you come to the conclusion that the 2022  team had no chance?

I don't have an exact date.  Probably at some point in 2020.

Elias has been pretty upfront I'll give him that.

I've never been yelling for the team to sign a bunch of expensive guys, I want him to stop gaming service time.  Mountcastle should have been up sooner, Adley should have been up by now.  While he did do a nice job with in season promotions I think he was overly conservative in initial placements.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, waroriole said:

I think that’s obvious to anyone. You don’t win 52 games, presumably make no moves to get better, and compete just because you eventually promote two top prospects. 

I largely agree.  I expect them to improve but not be competitive.  I wrote the 2022 team off in 2018.

What I can't wrap my mind around, is why someone who spent the summer of 2021 demanding/insisting that the Orioles should be better right now!, would then head into the fall of 2021 suggesting they should trade their best players because they're not better right now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You don’t have to get the best prospect in the sport to justify trading him.  That’s just over the top.

If the Marlins offered Meyer and Lopez, you say no?

Admittedly I would have a hard time saying no to that. I would be very surprised to get that kind of offer from a team like the Marlins.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't have an exact date.  Probably at some point in 2020.

Elias has been pretty upfront I'll give him that.

I've never been yelling for the team to sign a bunch of expensive guys, I want him to stop gaming service time.  Mountcastle should have been up sooner, Adley should have been up by now.  While he did do a nice job with in season promotions I think he was overly conservative in initial placements.

 

These are points are fair enough.  Reasonable people can differ.

What should also be noted however is none of that would have made more than a silver of difference in the competitiveness of the ball club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

IMO, I think Elias is trying to architect this rebuild - or whatever you want to call it- by doing it from the minor leagues and prospects stockpiled by our own resources (draft and development) and minor trades.

I don't get the feeling that he's going to move a star player for additional pieces.  He's traded guys like Bundy and Villar and Cashner, guys that are somewhat decent but he's not traded someone who some could consider a cornerstone piece in order to diversify talent. 

This kind of ties in with the narrative here about wondering if Elias can really be an MLB GM.  I don't think anyone here would want to argue with the work he's done in setting up a South American presence and his drafts are pretty positive from where I sit

But is he a guy that can swing a trade of a major piece in order to pick up additional pieces?  Remains to be seen.  

Has he made even one such trade yet? It’s not necessarily time to do so yet, but I’m really excited to see what kind of a horse trader he is.

Off the top of my head, I don’t think any trade he’s made yet has been successful.

I would be especially interested in seeing some kind of negotiation between him and the gal in Miami, I am extremely interested in how the other GM’s are going to react to her, and I don’t think she’s made any big trades yet either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...