Jump to content

MLB Lockout Thread


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

On 3/5/2022 at 12:21 PM, Can_of_corn said:

Now the [last three years] is starting to feel personal.

Fixed the for you.  Orioles enter rebuild.  Oops, no minor league season.  Orioles get top pick.  We are going to shorten the draft.  Orioles have the top rule 5 pick.  We don't have time for that.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

Fixed the for you.  Orioles enter rebuild.  Oops, no minor league season.  Orioles get top pick.  We are going to shorten the draft.  Orioles have the top rule 5 pick.  We don't have time for that.

Ownership is probably happy for an excuse to extend the rebuild payroll.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t understand the purpose of these proposals, when we are in canceling games mode, that barely move the needle on the big topics? 
 

All you just did was come down a tiny bit and ensure that more games are going to be canceled.

Haven't missed enough games yet to suit the owners so they are just offering enough to give the illusion of progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t understand the purpose of these proposals, when we are in canceling games mode, that barely move the needle on the big topics? 
 

All you just did was come down a tiny bit and ensure that more games are going to be canceled.

The argument is over what amounts to $1M per team, owners are an absolute joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

It isn't even actual money.  It's the ability to spend money without penalty.

The penalties only apply to 4 or 5 top revenue teams.  Let's just say I would be ecstatic if the O's ever paid a CBT tax.  It means the O's have increased their revenue, the O's are spending more money than they get in revenue.  The only scenarios I could see this happening is if the O's are a winning team and are trying to put the finishing touches on a team to win the World Series and the O's have one of the wealthiest owners in baseball (not the Angelos' brothers, so the team has been sold).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

The penalties only apply to 4 or 5 top revenue teams.  Let's just say I would be ecstatic if the O's ever paid a CBT tax.  

Get ready to celebrate, because the Orioles paid more luxury tax money than any other team in baseball from 1997-99.

Seriously, though, the CBT levels affect every team. If the Yankees are restricted to spending $210m on payroll, the Blue Jays can set a budget of, say, $150m and still appear credible to their fans, who are conditioned to not expect them to try to outspend the Yankees even though they are owned by a megacorporation that has revenues in the billions. No fan is going to shed a tear that Bryce Harper's contract pays him "only" $25m/year, less than he thought he was going to get, but that figure sets a baseline that gets used in arbitration. Harper had to settle for a longer contract and less per year because the richest teams were avoiding the CBT threshold. MLB loves it when reporters suggest that the CBT is only relevant to the wealthiest, most elite of players because they want to drive a wedge between union members.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

 

I dont think the league spokesperson understands how negotiating works.

If you give on one sticking point you ask for more on another.  So if they are will to go to 16 teams in the playoff maybe they come back to a previous negotationg position in another.

Clearly trying to move public sentiment against the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I dont think the league spokesperson understands how negotiating works.

If you give on one sticking point you ask for more on another.  So if they are will to go to 16 teams in the playoff maybe they come back to a previous negotationg position in another.

Clearly trying to move public sentiment against the players.

They want capitulation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Wait, are you saying that it's the combined H2H? I guess that does make sense. So, in that circumstance, in a 3 way tie...the Tigers get the #4 seed, the O's #5, and Royals #6?
    • Bubic is really good. Zerpa has a pretty bad K-BB rate on the season though and gives up hard contact, so it looks like that may just be a good stretch for him. His xERA is 4.49 on the season. Lynch is solid but he’s a low K, low BB lefty. Definitely not bad, but he’s going to give up contact.  
    • Yeah, I was tracking #1 overall at some point, not next year. Unless Basallo still has rookie eligibility, I don't see anyone having a chance after next season.
    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...