Jump to content

MLB Lockout Thread


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Baseball once again can’t get it right …. They should agree on a % of revenue that needs to spent on players and that money should go into a pool that is split evenly among the teams to make the game fair. 
 

Lots to address the selfishness of the players and owners ….nothing for the fans of the majority of teams not in New York, LA, or Boston.

I've grown to hate the word fair.

Haddaway once asked "What is love?"

I say what is fair?

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roch has the details of the schedule starting in 2023:

14 games (7h/7a) vs each division opponent = 56 games 

6 games (3h/3a) vs the other teams in your league but not in your division = 60 games 

4 games (2h/2a) vs a designated interleague rival (the Nats in our case) 

3 games vs each other team in the other league = 42 games.  Alternating home/away each season.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Roch has the details of the schedule starting in 2023:

14 games (7h/7a) vs each division opponent = 56 games 

6 games (3h/3a) vs the other teams in your league but not in your division = 60 games 

4 games (2h/2a) vs a designated interleague rival (the Nats in our case) 

3 games vs each other team in the other league = 42 games.  Alternating home/away each season.

 

 

Sounds like 129/162 will become the "same" for everyone.

The 20 divisional games drawn down look like they are ALL allocated to expanded interleague play.   I can see those who'd argue this is a stepping stone along with NL DH towards the traditional distinction between American and National Leagues fading away.

Perhaps in time Ohtani and Soto will be All-Star captains choosing up sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

Roch has the details of the schedule starting in 2023:

14 games (7h/7a) vs each division opponent = 56 games 

6 games (3h/3a) vs the other teams in your league but not in your division = 60 games 

4 games (2h/2a) vs a designated interleague rival (the Nats in our case) 

3 games vs each other team in the other league = 42 games.  Alternating home/away each season.

 

 

I like this pretty well.   I would have been fine leaving intraleague at 18, but I like the 56/106 split between division/non-division games.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hadn’t heard this detail:

“The minor league minimum salary for players signing a second major league contract or with prior big league service will increase from $93,000 in 2021 to $114,100 in 2022, $117,400 in 2023, $120,600 in 2024, $123,900 in 2025 and $127,100 in 2026.”

I do think the up-and-down players came out pretty well in the negotiation, between this increase, the increase in the major league minimum, and the limit on how many times a player can be optioned in a season.    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Seems irrelevant to me to compare one item of revenue with one item of expense.    It’s not like payroll is the only thing a team spends money on.   Obviously it’s the most significant one, and the most variable.   

I don't disagree, I posted about the revenue aspect of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It’s probably fairly inevitable that Grayson will need TJ at some point in his career. Velo increases the risk. However, it’s very common for all pitchers, regardless of velo. The biggest thing Grayson has going for him is that he’s made it to age 24 without a shoulder or elbow injury (at least that I can recall), which already separates him from many others in the high velo club. The best predictor of future injuries is past injuries, and while he did have that lat issue that knocked him out for a fair bit his record is pretty clean in that respect.  Also, it’s more the conventional baseball wisdom than something I’m aware of being supported in stats, but Grayson has a prototypical pitcher’s frame and in theory that could help his durability. It doesn’t seem like he generates his velo from a max effort delivery.
    • It was a fastball.   If you’re bailing out on a fastball from a LHP with a 3/4 delivery like that I think there’s a problem but if you think it’s perfectly fine you’re entitled to your opinion.
    • It’s been a few years, but I seem to recall there was some talk about his playing 2B when Duquette was still here. Might have been some kind of instructional league chatter or something. It certainly cannot hurt. 
    • I'm not sure that I understand all of your post. In particular the mentioning of Elias and Adley in comparison to Belichick and Brady. That is an apples to strawberries comparison at best. Both are fruit and red and round, otherwise unalike. Brady's role as QB and BB's role as head coach and GM is far different and much more directly central to success than Elias GM and certainly Adley as a catcher. However, when speaking about Hal Steinbrenner being an impediment to Elias remaining as GM of the Orioles long term, I don't see it. NY is a totally different market than here. You are NEVER going to be given 4 years for a total tear down and all the future building moves for the sake of the present won't fly in NY. Yes, I am sure than other owners like Steinbrenner envy what the O's have amassed. It's why they changed the draft rules. However, some owners know that the path that Elias used to get the Orioles to where they are is not viable in their markets as they know how alienating it would be to their fanbase. This is to say, that if Elias wants to be here, Rubenstein has the pockets that are plenty deep enough to make that happen. It's probably going to be a similar contract to what the Mets are paying Stearns and the Dodgers are paying Friedman.
    • If he can't locate the breaking stuff and throw the fastball with a good location he gets destroyed. I keep hearing how good his stuff is, but his pitch values are not good on anything but his offspeed pitch. His fastball had negative run value last year and it does again this year. Barrel and hard hit % are both up this year too. I guess he'll live or die by the changeup if it's working or not. Whiff rate and K% are good not great according to statcast.
    • What about Means and Kremer?
    • If the Sacramento A's need a second baseman I am fine with this. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...