Jump to content

MLB Lockout Thread


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't go as far as to say this means I am rooting for an International Draft, but this speculated timeline if correct would defray a little of one of the Yankees traditional advantages over the Orioles.

12:4
Adam: The Yankees and Padres each have notable 2023 J2 signing commitments. If there is an International Draft implemented in the next CBA, are those agreements scrubbed or do you think the draft would not begin until after a certain grace period?

 

 
12:47
Kevin Goldstein: Those agreements would be scrubbed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yep it it totally OK to hope they implement something to depress the earnings of International players if it might mildly inconvenience the Yankees.

It doesn’t have to depress the earnings.   That depends on whether the slots for the international draft tally up to more or less than the slots allotted to the teams now.   I do agree that the owners would try for a lower number.   They could do that regardless of whether a draft is used to select the players.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It doesn’t have to depress the earnings.   That depends on whether the slots for the international draft tally up to more or less than the slots allotted to the teams now.   I do agree that the owners would try for a lower number.   They could do that regardless of whether a draft is used to select the players.   

The owners want an International draft because they believe it will lower costs.

If it doesn't lower costs they will make a big deal about capitulating on the issue and they won't have one.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Kevin Goldstein in his chat today at FanGraphs, where he admits he’s now expecting that some games next season will be lost: “I’m starting to think we’ll miss some games. Not a huge chunk, but I don’t think either side is going to get down to brass tacks until there is real pressure, and think we could end up playing 154 or something …. Just in talking to people on both sides of the (very deep) trench, it feels like both sides are far more dug in than I thought.”

So if we miss some games that would mean the Davis buyout would end up costing more than if they did nothing. If its only 8 games are so that wouldnt be a big deal, but still.  I was suspicious of Borras's intentions at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

So if we miss some games that would mean the Davis buyout would end up costing more than if they did nothing. If its only 8 games are so that wouldnt be a big deal, but still.  I was suspicious of Borras's intentions at the time. 

My guess is that Boras was working at the will of his employer.

I highly doubt he talked Davis into a settlement over a few days pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

My guess is that Boras was working at the will of his employer.

I highly doubt he talked Davis into a settlement over a few days pay.

Nor did he have any information about the probability of a lockout that Elias didn’t also have.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always find it amusing how the fans, generally speaking, hate Manfred and hate Goodell.   They basically work for the owners and the owners just seem to love these guys because, correct me if I'm wrong, their real job is to help the owners make as much money as possible.   Franchise values continue to skyrocket year after year after year.   Teams are now worth BILLIONS.   Don't I remember Steinbrenner buying the Yankess for something like 12 million back in the 70's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, RZNJ said:

I always find it amusing how the fans, generally speaking, hate Manfred and hate Goodell.   They basically work for the owners and the owners just seem to love these guys because, correct me if I'm wrong, their real job is to help the owners make as much money as possible.   Franchise values continue to skyrocket year after year after year.   Teams are now worth BILLIONS.   Don't I remember Steinbrenner buying the Yankess for something like 12 million back in the 70's?

How much of that is also because of limited supply and because of inflation of value because of said limited supply?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/14/2021 at 2:59 PM, jabba72 said:

So if we miss some games that would mean the Davis buyout would end up costing more than if they did nothing. If its only 8 games are so that wouldnt be a big deal, but still.  I was suspicious of Borras's intentions at the time. 

They stretched out his deferred payout quite a bit IIRC.  So the present value of his severance is quite a bit lower than his dollar figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Despite being a lifelong baseball nut, I'd never heard when or why the antitrust exemption began.   USA Today gets the Google gold star, turns out 2022 will be its 100th Anniversary.    Not interstate commerce, heh.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2021/04/13/mlb-antitrust-exemption-immunity-ted-cruz-josh-hawley-baseball-all-star-game/7211552002/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • He threw that fastball right down the shoot on a 1-2 count. That was not a case of Trout being Trout. It was a case of horrible location. I have to believe that it was not his intention to throw it there after he watched us beat Trout several times the night before with hard stuff up in the zone (Trout's only weakness). Maybe the extra day messed up something with Rodriguez's ability to execute? Maybe he just had a bad night? But this was not the case of the Angels being good. It was Grayson who was really bad.
    • But, but they lost. They absorbed a loss. 
    • That’s probably true and Elias said he also didn’t want to call him up if he wasn’t ready to be an everyday player.   So ………. something to keep an eye on.
    • Yea he has looked bad but while it’s fair to point that out, it’s also fair to point that some of this could be attributed to rust, an injury, not having a real ST, not playing in the field as much (I assume since he’s not catching?), etc…I think his timing is likely off and he’s working himself back into things. He has played 15 games. He has a multi hit game in 1/3 of his game so far. You point out all the Ks…what’s funny is all the Ks came in 5 games and he hasn’t struck out the last 4. To me the only thing that bothers me as of right now is the zero walks but it’s not something that would concern me long term.
    • This indicates that his timing is off. And as many have already mentioned, he is pulling off the ball. This probably due to his lower confidence (because he has been scuffling) and not trusting himself enough to stay back and go with the pitch. This will get corrected in due time.
    • That's fine we each are entitled to our opinions.  I think we both want the same thing, which is for Holliday to get it going. As to how he get's there, we will have to see how it plays out.
    • Maybe not so good that his front hip is almost in the first base dugout and he has to get fully extended just to reach a ball on the outside corner.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...