Jump to content

The Athletic trade discussions- Mancini


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

Colorado Rockies (Groke)

Offer from the Rockies: OF Raimel Tapia and 3B/1B Colton Welker
 

Milwaukee Brewers (Sammon)

Offer from the Brewers: 1B/OF/DH Thomas Dillard and RHP Matt Hardy

Pittsburgh Pirates (Biertempfel)

Offer from the Pirates: RHP Chris Strattonand INF Cole Tucker

an Diego Padres (Lin)

Offer from the Padres: C Victor Caratini and RHP Reiss Knehr

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point of the article IMO is to show that Mancini doesn't have much trade value.  And I agree.  Coming off missing a year from cancer he had a 711 OPS in the 2nd half as a DH.  Not what most teams are looking for.

These kind of returns should be available at the deadline for Mancini.  There is real no reason to trade him for that kind of return  before the season begins.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

The point of the article IMO is to show that Mancini doesn't have much trade value.  And I agree.  Coming off missing a year from cancer he had a 711 OPS in the 2nd half as a DH.  Not what most teams are looking for.

These kind of returns should be available at the deadline for Mancini.  There is really no reason to trade him for that kind of return  before the season begins.

 

The thing is, even if he’s having a very good year, these offers aren’t going to improve at the deadline.

So, if you can get the same for him now as you will be able to then, the trade should occur now.  No reason to keep him around.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The thing is, even if he’s having a very good year, these offers aren’t going to improve at the deadline.

So, if you can get the same for him now as you will be able to then, the trade should occur now.  No reason to keep him around.

 

I am hoping for a return to his 2019 performance level.   His trade value could increase if that happens.   Especially if some 1B is injured on a contending team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of these interest me.  Tapia, Stratton, Tucker, and Caratini are all worse than Mancini (at least in context of this team).  The rest of the guys have little to no chance of even making it to the MLB.  This basically means Mancini is a salary dump...

If this is his market now, then keep him and hope the market shifts heading into the trade deadline.  If not, then a 'send-off' PR stunt for the feel good.

Matt Hardy's BB:KK is interesting.  But I don't really know anything about him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I am hoping for a return to his 2019 performance level.   His trade value could increase if that happens.   Especially if some 1B is injured on a contending team.

But you aren’t being realistic.  First of all, while I agree 2019 is possible, it’s also not likely.  That is the outlier year and came when he was 27, which is historically the peak year for a player.

Secondly, even if he has a big first half, he’s still just a rental and his value would only be marginally better than right now.  The downside is far greater than the upside.  My guess is you could get a few prospects in the 8-15 range in an organization and maybe get a third player who is a lottery ticket type guy.   That is a fine return for Mancini.  
 

We can quibble over the players themselves but that return is fine.  No reason to hold onto him in hopes of the best player going from ranked 10th in an organization to one ranked 7th.  It’s just not a big enough jump to justify paying him And holding onto him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The thing is, even if he’s having a very good year, these offers aren’t going to improve at the deadline.

So, if you can get the same for him now as you will be able to then, the trade should occur now.  No reason to keep him around.

 

Elias paid 7m for Lyles on what is probably a one year contract.  Very unlikely they pay him 11m in 2023.  Mancini is at least as good a player as Lyles.   So I don't think saving Mancini's 1st half salary is an issue.

Elias has to start showing progress on the field.  Another 100 lose season does not help the rebuild.   

When Stowers arrives that is when the roster gets a little tighter depending on injuries. But that is probably not until June at the earliest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Elias paid 7m for Lyles on what is probably a one year contract.  Very unlikely they pay him 11m in 2023.  Mancini is at least as good a player as Lyles.   So I don't think saving Mancini's 1st half salary is an issue.

Elias has to start showing progress on the field.  Another 100 lose season does not help the rebuild.   

When Stowers arrives that is when the roster gets a little tighter depending on injuries. But that is probably not until June at the earliest.

I must have missed all the games the Os have won with Mancini.  If you think he’s stopping us from losing 100 games, you haven’t been paying attention.  Mancini isn’t any kind of lynch pin to a sub 100 loss season.

BtW, while I would trade Mancini, I would be making other moves to make the team better overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 Mancini isn’t any kind of lynch pin to a sub 100 loss season.

 

On the flip side, Mancini isn't any kind of lynchpin to net us some great players to propel this team forward.  I think the best result of trading him would probably be some sort of roster flexibility...an addition by subtraction of sorts.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

On the flip side, Mancini isn't any kind of lynchpin to net us some great players to propel this team forward.  I think the best result of trading him would probably be some sort of roster flexibility...an addition by subtraction of sorts.  

No, he won’t net great players (unless someone develops unexpectedly) but he certainly could net players who could be contributing role player type pieces on the next contender.  Would love to add a few power arms or players like that.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Secondly, even if he has a big first half, he’s still just a rental and his value would only be marginally better than right now.  The downside is far greater than the upside.  My guess is you could get a few prospects in the 8-15 range in an organization and maybe get a third player who is a lottery ticket type guy.  

This is a fair expectation.  No reason to expect a top tier prospect in return.  Mancini's salary is the big issue.  If we would pay a significant chunk of his salary, then the return should open up a bit.  Given our 2022 payroll, I would hope this is on the table.

However, it is odd seeing the potential NL DH-type market start to develop.  Like the Padres signing Nomar Mazara, the Brewers signing Eric Thames, Cards thinking DeJong is their answer.  Other than salary, Mancini and other trade candidates on other teams are upgrades over those.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

Just hold onto him and let him walk, man. If something pops up at the deadline, great (for him, mostly, if it's a playoff team). If not, sometimes it's ok to just let a guy play out his contract and wish him the best. 

It’s ok to do that when you are trying to win.  It’s not ok when the team is garbage and could get something that could potentially help them later.

And btw, it’s doing Mancini a favor to get him off this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...