Jump to content

Adley Rutschman 2022


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, yark14 said:

Gunnar would have been our best 3B last year as a 19 year old.

Gunnar would've been eaten alive last year. He struggled to adjust to both High-A and Double-A with tons of strikeouts, and made a bunch of errors. Development is important, he worked and got better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, yark14 said:

Gunnar would have been our best 3B last year as a 19 year old.

Oh I thought he would have been awful.

But I also thought it would help rather than hinder him long term.

Under my admittedly unrealistic plan he would be in year two of a 10 year deal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, seak05 said:

Gunnar would've been eaten alive last year. He struggled to adjust to both High-A and Double-A with tons of strikeouts, and made a bunch of errors. Development is important, he worked and got better.

The question is what is best for development?

I don't think a one size fits all approach is best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The question is what is best for development?

I don't think a one size fits all approach is best.

I think that's a reasonable statement, I think you want to challenge people but not put them in totally over their heads. That said, the statement I responded to was that he would've been the O's best third baseman last year...and that's not accurate, as bad as the O's third base situation was...it's better then you would have gotten out of 19yo Gunnar

(now it's distinctly possible, likely even, he is currently our best option)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, seak05 said:

Gunnar would've been eaten alive last year. He struggled to adjust to both High-A and Double-A with tons of strikeouts, and made a bunch of errors. Development is important, he worked and got better.

Oh he definitely would have struggled.  My point is that the bar at 3B was/is so low that he'd still be our best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2022 at 9:30 PM, seak05 said:

catches tomorrow so the Orioles can check off the three in a row "box", up on Saturday (but seriously might be time to storm the yard with pitchforks)

hey, maybe, one can only hope 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I’m guessing it’s #3. I was a bit worried about #4, but if that was the case, don’t think that Suarez would be pitching today. 
    • Are you OK with context independent batting inputs that are used in WAR?  It feels like pitching and hitting should be symmetrical in terms of how they factor in sequencing.   FRV is definitely better than DRS for outfielders, as @tangotiger convincingly argues here.  For infielders, it’s more debatable, especially 1B where only DRS accounts for picks. By the way, Fangraphs WAR leaderboard allows you to toggle between FIP, RA9, and a 50/50 mix.  Cowser beats Gil regardless of the approach.
    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...