Jump to content

Raise your hand if you think Watkins was a better choice than Bradish?


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Put your hand down Mike, we already know you do.

This should be a transition year where the Orioles are seeing what they have in their young pitching. Bradish is one of those guys, but he was starting in Norfolk tonight sitting in the mid-90s while allowing just two hits with six Ks in 4 IP while Watkins is unable to make a throw to first base.

So the question is at this point, is Elias still not trying to win, or is he and his staff unable to evaluate talent? What world should Watkins be getting starts over Bradish? 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Bradish is 25 years old and while he didn't pitch great at Norfolk he has AAA experience already. He's shown more promise than other pitchers who made the team. I think he'll be called up before the end of April. 

So you think Bradish will only get three starts at Norfolk? I see end of May.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

List of pitchers (in no particular order) who should have been given a chance to start today over Spenser Watkins (discounting availability, they had months to line up available starters):

  1. Alexander Wells
  2. Zac Lowther
  3. Kyle Bradish
  4. Grayson Rodriguez
  5. Keegan Akin
  6. Mike Baumann
  7. Kyle Brnovich
  8. Blaine Knight
  9. Ofelky Peralta 
  10. Cody Sedlock
  11. Kevin Smith

I'm sure there are others.  At the end of the day if you say this a "transition" year or whatever they want to call it, you need to actually evaluate people at the ML level.  Note that I don't think many of the above are major league starters or even major league pitchers in general, but I know Spenser Watkins isn't.  What information did we acquire tonight?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just added a few thoughts in the Minor League forum. Bradish is ready. He's not going to learn anything at AAA, and we're not going to learn anything either. I think he's going to have some struggles with the transition, but it's time to start that process with him. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Bradish should have started in Baltimore tonight. I wanted him to break camp with the big team. I believe in a fair amount of caution with young pitchers, but this seems a bit much. At this point, I would rather go through the ups and downs of a young starter than watch Spenser Watkins pitch ever again. Nice guy and all, but pack your stuff, you’re out of here!

If Alexander Wells craps the bed again too, take him with you. And Dean Kremer too, whenever his sprained man-bun recovers. Last chance for both of them for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand why Elias is doing what he is doing.   On Sept 11th last year Bradish had a 5.02 ERA. That does not say I am ready for the majors.

In his next 3 starts he pitched 15 innings and allowed one earned run.  That lower his ERA to 4.26.   Add yesterday's  game and he has had 4 good starts in a row.   Elias believes what you guy's preach all the time.   SSS.  

So Elias wants to see more at AAA.    He wants to see domination before Bradish is promoted.   Is that one more good start? Two? Three?   Only Elias knows for sure.  Its frustrating.  But there  is  some logic to it.  Many of you should be right there with Elias in his logic.    SSS is in your wheel house.

Its not about Bradish being better than Watkins.  Its about is Bradish ready to come up to the majors and stay.  Check the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...