Jump to content

Anthony Santander 2022


OsFanSinceThe80s

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Bbref has him at $3.1mm. 1.0 WAR so far. He might fetch something. Stowers and Cowser aren’t looking like the locks they did last year. 

Stowers is bumming me out more than Cowser, and I know that's not a take most people agree with. But Stowers was the guy that enabled you to make trades. Or even be a trade target himself if the O's decided to trade from their one-time apparent outfield depth. Now? I dunno. You certainly don't want to trade Santander and just hand RF to Stowers and watch him K himself into oblivion at the ML level, which is what it looks like he'd be doing right now. 

Stowers playing poorly is a huge hit to the young outfield depth in this organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spy Fox said:

Even with slowish starts from Stowers and Cowser, our OF depth is still much stronger than our IF depth. I think trading Santander for pitching or infielders at some point is still a solid potential approach. 

What OF depth though? If Stowers isn't a dude, then you're left with Neustrom (OBP down below .320 now) and.... who exactly? McKenna and Stewart? Diaz? 

Haskin at AA?

Stowers is the real key to this depth, which is quickly seeming not as deep as it once did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

Even with slowish starts from Stowers and Cowser, our OF depth is still much stronger than our IF depth. I think trading Santander for pitching or infielders at some point is still a solid potential approach. 

Outfield depth at the ML level but our best prospects, IMO, are Henderson, Westburg, Mayo, Prieto.  Right now, I'm not sure I place an outfielder ahead of those 4.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, interloper said:

What OF depth though? If Stowers isn't a dude, then you're left with Neustrom (OBP down below .320 now) and.... who exactly? McKenna and Stewart? Diaz? 

Haskin at AA?

Stowers is the real key to this depth, which is quickly seeming not as deep as it once did. 

 

13 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Outfield depth at the ML level but our best prospects, IMO, are Henderson, Westburg, Mayo, Prieto.  Right now, I'm not sure I place an outfielder ahead of those 4.  

I guess it depends how much you read into those slow starts-- when I look at the outfield situation I see three pretty strong MLB players and a couple solid but not on-fire prospects. For the infield (outside 1b) what we have in Baltimore is SO bad and what we have in prospects is farther away on average than what we have in the outfield. 

To contend in the next few years we may only need one "hit" among the outfield prospects. We probably need multiple in the infield. If Stowers/Cowser have bad years in the end and most of those infielders have good years then the odds may change, but right now I still think we have a better chance of meeting our own needs on the OF front. 

There's an unknown with who we draft #1 as well-- infielder or outfielder (doesn't seem like a pitcher is likely this year). We'll know that by the trade deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if I trade Santander or not. I'm loving the fact he has walked a lot more this year, but he hasn't drawn a walk in his last seven games. His average is higher than it was on April 30, but his OBP has dropped over 40-points in that span. I'd like to see if he can stabilize that OBP and keep it 100 points over his average going forward or if he continues to regress to his typical lower OBP self. If the team thinks the extra walks and higher OBP is a mirage and going to continue to regress, then I'm all for moving him still, but if not and it could be for real, I'd like to keep him given Stowers and Cowser are bigger questions and Heston Kjerstad has still yet to play a regular season game as a professional.

Currently, once Hays is back on the field, the outfield looks solid in the majors right now and there are some guys on the farm (even if the biggest names have serious questions right now). The outfield depth is fine, but not good enough for me to trade Santander if he really has found a way to improve in the OBP department. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So last night I finish dinner and check my phone to see what’s going on in the game.  I look and it’s still the first inning, runners on 1st and 3rd and nobody out, with Santander up.   I turn on my TV just in time to see Santander line one into the hole between 1st and 2nd, but Torres makes a great diving catch and Mancini is doubled up at first.   I start cursing and yelling so bad that my wife leaves the room, and I hadn’t had the TV on for more than 30 seconds yet.   I knew in the depths of my soul that we were destined to muster almost no more offense and lose that game.  If Torres doesn’t catch that ball, the whole game might have been different.  I hate baseball sometimes.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

So last night I finish dinner and check my phone to see what’s going on in the game.  I look and it’s still the first inning, runners on 1st and 3rd and nobody out, with Santander up.   I turn on my TV just in time to see Santander line one into the hole between 1st and 2nd, but Torres makes a great diving catch and Mancini is doubled up at first.   I start cursing and yelling so bad that my wife leaves the room, and I hadn’t had the TV on for more than 30 seconds yet.   I knew in the depths of my soul that we were destined to muster almost no more offense and lose that game.  If Torres doesn’t catch that ball, the whole game might have been different.  I hate baseball sometimes.  

I can't imagine you cursing or yelling lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, interloper said:

Stowers is bumming me out more than Cowser, and I know that's not a take most people agree with. But Stowers was the guy that enabled you to make trades. Or even be a trade target himself if the O's decided to trade from their one-time apparent outfield depth. Now? I dunno. You certainly don't want to trade Santander and just hand RF to Stowers and watch him K himself into oblivion at the ML level, which is what it looks like he'd be doing right now. 

Stowers playing poorly is a huge hit to the young outfield depth in this organization.

The O's can always put Owings in RF,  That guy can play anywhere! 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I’m guessing it’s #3. I was a bit worried about #4, but if that was the case, don’t think that Suarez would be pitching today. 
    • Are you OK with context independent batting inputs that are used in WAR?  It feels like pitching and hitting should be symmetrical in terms of how they factor in sequencing.   FRV is definitely better than DRS for outfielders, as @tangotiger convincingly argues here.  For infielders, it’s more debatable, especially 1B where only DRS accounts for picks. By the way, Fangraphs WAR leaderboard allows you to toggle between FIP, RA9, and a 50/50 mix.  Cowser beats Gil regardless of the approach.
    • Hm, seems like perfect situation for Akin as an opener, maybe game 3 if necessary? 
    • You are such a Rebel.
    • Another possibility: If you win game 1, maybe you don't ptich Eflin in Game 2 and try to win Game 2 without using him.   I mean, worst that can happen is you lose and have Eflin for game 3 anyway.   So you won't lose the wild card series without pitching your two best. But you COULD win the wild card series without your two best, and then you would have Eflin and Burnes lined up for games 1 and 2 in Cleveland
    • I like Law a lot, but that is a beyond asinine comment about not playing every day on a playoff team. You know how many playoff teams would slot him in the lineup immediately every game? Answer: the large majority. The Yankees would take Cowser over Verdugo The Tigers might not put him in over Greene/Meadows/Carpenter, but they’d DH him over their options. Cowser would start over every outfielder for the Royals, IMHO. He’d start over Meyers and Dubon for the Astros. The Guardians would probably start him over anybody not named Kwan in the OF, tbh.  I can keep going.
    • Even more of a reason to like FG over BBref,  tbh. Thanks, didn’t realize they switched this year. My point re: FIP is that I rather prefer it over RA/9, not to say it’s perfect. RA/9 treats all runs allowed by a pitcher the same regardless of them being earned or unearned. So, a pitcher on a team with a terrible defense is going to be judged much more harshly than somebody that pitches on a top tier defense. Not to mention the bullpen taking over mid inning dilemma. The funny thing is in your example re: FIP, RA/9 would have the first pitcher but love the second. Either way, these stats, like nearly all single solitary stats, aren’t best taken alone.  For your example, let’s say Pitcher A allowed weak contact and the defenders just had poor range, poor arms, whatever, but in the second example the defenders had great range and great arms making amazing plays to prevent any damage…then what?  Anyways, give me FIP over RA/9 was my point. But if you want to truly assess a pitcher, you’re going to need a few complimentary stats to go along with it.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...