Jump to content

The LF wall tracker


OsEatAlEast

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

I bet I'm in the minority on this, but I wish every ballpark was a standard size, just like most every other sport. I know people will hate this opinion, but I think it just makes sense. 

But it's not like every other sport. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

I bet I'm in the minority on this, but I wish every ballpark was a standard size, just like most every other sport. I know people will hate this opinion, but I think it just makes sense. 

I think you could argue for minimum ballpark dimensions to account for players being stronger today and to get rid of the obvious bandboxes. 

Each ballpark has it's own environmental factors that also impacts how far the ball travels when it's put in play. I say get rid of cheap home runs where possible, but let the individual ballparks retain their own unique character. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Lol

I'm no fan of what they did to Camden Yards, but you gotta love Mullins' response. Yankees Stadium right field fence allowed a homer that had a .010 XBA. Now that's a joke. 

I have no issue with the Orioles changing their park to suit the way they want to build a team (I think we will see a lot of left-handed or switch hitters in the future), but i do think they went overboard with the distance, particularly to LC. 

I also hate the now giant wall as it takes away the intimacy with the fans. But yeah, the Yankees do come off as crybabies when they have a bandbox stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm no fan of what they did to Camden Yards, but you gotta love Mullins' response. Yankees Stadium right field fence allowed a homer that had a .010 XBA. Now that's a joke. 

I have no issue with the Orioles changing their park to suit the way they want to build a team (I think we will see a lot of left-handed or switch hitters in the future), but i do think they went overboard with the distance, particularly to LC. 

I also hate the now giant wall as it takes away the intimacy with the fans. But yeah, the Yankees do come off as crybabies when they have a bandbox stadium.

To be clear, that's a parody/joke account. So, not a real quote from Mullins.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I think you could argue for minimum ballpark dimensions to account for players being stronger today and to get rid of the obvious bandboxes. 

Each ballpark has it's own environmental factors that also impacts how far the ball travels when it's put in play. I say get rid of cheap home runs where possible, but let the individual ballparks retain their own unique character. 

 

They do have minimum dimensions, though some older stadiums were grandfathered.   Whether those minimums are sufficient is another question.  

“The rulebook states that parks constructed by professional teams after June 1, 1958, must have a minimum distance of 325 feet between home plate and the nearest fence, stand or other obstruction on the right- and left-field foul lines, and 400 feet between home plate and the nearest fence, stand or other obstruction in center field. However, some clubs have been permitted to construct parks after that date with dimensions shorter than those specified.”

https://www.mlb.com/glossary/rules/field-dimensions

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

It's really no big deal.......Judge can whine about not getting homers because our stadium doesn’t cater to him anymore  

I also think he should really dig nice and deep into the batters box tonight. Get nice and comfy in there Aaron!

Now that the O's have pissed him off, he'll probably have 3 HR and a double with a huge assist from O's pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This big year by Judge is coming at a perfect time.  He has already turned down one really dumb contract and now the Yankees will likely be dumb enough to give him an even dumber contract.  Just in time for the upcoming inevitable decline of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I also wanted to say, this is pretty awesome.  I'm assuming that in the history of never, there's been a ball hit in OPACY that only OPACY would have held it.  

I think that Mountcastle’s double a few weeks ago also was out in 29 of 30 ballparks.   Pretty sure someone posted a tweet from this same site to that effect.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if this was mentioned already, but didn't the O's already experiment with changing the dimensions of the park? They didn't change the fence line, but i thought they moved home plate back a bit, hated it, then moved it back to where it remains today.

Moving the wall and tearing out seats was far more aggressive than that, but it's not irreversible. If they don't like how far they moved the needle, they can refine it this offseason. Snip snap snip snap snip snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
    • LOL, I was worried last year about getting swept in four games by the Red Sox when the magic number for the division was 1. Part of being a fan is imagining the worst case scenario. I would agree it's not likely, though.
    • O's just need to win 1. O's lose home field if they go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0. I actually have no idea what happens if the O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0, and Royals go 3-0. They'd all be 88-74. O's have tiebreaker over the Royals, but not over the Tigers. Royals have the tiebreaker over the Tigers, but not the Orioles. lol Does anybody know what happens in that situation? Does it go to intradivision?  If so, here are their records intradivision: Orioles: 32-20 (.615)  in AL East Royals: 33-19 (.634) in AL Central Tigers: 27-22 in AL Central Interestingly enough, that loss against the Yankees now means the Royals have the intradivision tie breaker. So it does look like there are 2 scenarios where the O's don't get home field: O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0 OR O's go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0/Royals go 3-0. If the Tigers lose, doesn't matter what the Royals or O's do.  I think?
    • Skubal holds Slater to a .000 average/.000 OPS. SSS with only 5 AB's, but he's 0-5 with 0 walks and 2k's. DH vs Skubal = Rivera
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...