Jump to content

Terrin Vavra 2022


interloper

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, seak05 said:

I’m going to throw it out there, that if you - random person on message board - “realizes” he’s not an mlb 2nd baseman, pro scouts from other teams would be able to figure it out too. 
 

(he’s also played a good amount in cf this year, and if you can handle cf defensively, you can generally handle lf/rf) 

No. I am a member of the Hangout Grand Counsel. I know and see all that has been and all that will be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Only a one-game sample, but Vavra hit some line drives in Durham yesterday. I hope he can do it again tonight. He didn't much of a chance to make any tough plays in center. I wonder what kind of defender he is at all his positions. It seems he could cover a lot of areas for the Orioles in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a scout, but the prospect reports don't seem to say he can't play 2b. How bad is his defense actually? Fangraphs and Milb both have him at 50 field, and fangraphs says he can play both middle infield positions. The Orioles have definitely been working him in CF this year though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2022 at 11:57 AM, ChosenOne21 said:

Yeah, I can't imagine Vavra's 2B glove is that much worse than Odor's and his bat is probably much better

He's a career .983 fielding pct. at 2nd ....  in 923 innings.

 

Odor is a career .974 fielding pct at 2nd

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, I've heard criticism of Vavra regarding his ability to turn a DP.

Vavra (minors career) turns  0.73 DP's per 9 inning game.

Odor (career) turns 0.75 DP's per 9 inning game.

(and that's with Vavra playing on MILB fields, and taking tosses from MILB players)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, owknows said:

Also, I've heard criticism of Vavra regarding his ability to turn a DP.

Vavra (minors career) turns  0.73 DP's per 9 inning game.

Odor (career) turns 0.75 DP's per 9 inning game.

(and that's with Vavra playing on MILB fields, and taking tosses from MILB players)

I’ve been to a few games at Harbor Park, so not enough to draw any firm conclusions and I’m also not a scout, but Vavra’s range seems fairly limited and he doesn’t have a cannon for an arm like Schoop. I don’t think he could’ve made the play that Odor made yesterday when he charged the ball, barehanded it, and threw it to first. I think he would be a slight drop off from Odor, but it wouldn’t be as noticeable as the drop off from Mateo to Westburg at short.

I actually think Westburg would be the best defender that they could play at second. He looked good when I saw him at second. I like that they have been playing him at second in addition to short and third this year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sydnor said:

I’ve been to a few games at Harbor Park, so not enough to draw any firm conclusions and I’m also not a scout, but Vavra’s range seems fairly limited and he doesn’t have a cannon for an arm like Schoop. I don’t think he could’ve made the play that Odor made yesterday when he charged the ball, barehanded it, and threw it to first. I think he would be a slight drop off from Odor, but it wouldn’t be as noticeable as the drop off from Mateo to Westburg at short.

I actually think Westburg would be the best defender that they could play at second. He looked good when I saw him at second. I like that they have been playing him at second in addition to short and third this year.

I agree that you really can't tell the whole story from stats... but I guess my point was that Vavra won't embarrass himself. Not at 2B... and Not in the OF.

Is Westburg a better defender? Maybe.

But there's room for Westburg and Vavra.  Not sure you're getting much out of Nevin or Arauz.

I think you have redundant coverage of 2B, SS, and 3B with Urias, Mateo, Odor, Vavra, and Westburg

And throw Stowers in the mix too. For McKenna, or after trading Santander.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Hi Puck- From a marketing standpoint the Orioles will eventually reach a relative saturation point which I agree is around 2.5m then it's about leveraging money from the fan experience-winning being a chief component of that.   
    • I doubt it.   wavetrapper joined about 10 days before OOO was banned.   He might have some similar views but seems better at claiming some unique expertise or superiority.   
    • Yes, it's possible.   But we don't know the extent to which the "old school" stuff is still taught.   I wouldn't assume it is ignored or underemphasized.   But, perhaps it is.   Nobody was asking that question last year or the first 2.5 months of this season, though.   I doubt the approach was any different when we were playing .650 ball than it is now.
    • Sports Guy- Isn't attendance becoming more of a  legacy statistic similar to Avg v. OPS?  It's a very different era than 1965 when there were few suites or "premium" seating and hardly any amenities beyond a beer and hot dog.  Today a seat and it's attachment rate are not comparable between say NY and KC-and we've seen the leverage of corporate sponsorship with TRP.  In the Warehouse I would think growing attachment rate and corporate partners would at some point have comparable priority as a revenue driver.  Seat sales account only ~20% of revenue and shrinking,  The revenue tilt is upgrading fans/corps. to a premium seat at an average of 4X the price.   Although this slide is from '22 it details the discrepancy between teams that can leverage premium seating and suites.  Playoff revenue is also likely in this slide which benefits teams like Houston. There is no real way I have found to judge revenue other than Forbes-just food for thought.  
    • The Mountcastle injury hasn't felt like a huge deal since we have a similarly-performing O'Hearn to slot into the same position.  But I think the lineup misses him. He is better than Eloy, Rivera, and the other guys his ABs are getting distributed to. And better defensively than O'Hearn.
    • There could be some interesting stuff to talk about here, or individual cases where what you're saying is true, but I think the short answer is no. Analytics are going to be more accurate overall than the old-school axioms-- the axioms that are provably true are probably still coached.   On point 1 we definitely have some players struggling to make adjustments and some of that may be that they're coached to hunt barrels at the expense of contact. The O's are built to maximize power and you can see that in their results (1st in SLG but 9th in AVG). Maybe a different approach could help some guys break out of a slump more easily, but it's hard to know because there are always struggling players no matter the coaching approach. Were the the Showalter O's missing old-school wisdom when they let Adam Jones continue whiffing on low and away sliders?  Point 2 I probably buy the least because pitching analytics across MLB have been so generally effective in helping players maximize their game. Probably there are ways the O's could be using their data better. Not every decision and result will be perfect. But analytics is golden for pitchers.  On point 3, is there any reason to think the O's are generally weak on defensive fundamentals compared to most teams? Gunnar had his recent error binge but that's all I can think of and that seemed more like a personal thing to me. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...