Jump to content

Potential 1st over pick info: Druw Jones - HS


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

I honestly don't remember but it doesn't feel like Jones has become the clear #1 until recently, meaning within the last 4-5 weeks.   I'd see most of his rising to #1 has to do with him putting up pretty impressive offensive numbers during his HS season.   I still see comments about his swing needing work even though he makes consistent hard contact.    So, I still see slight concerns about his bat.   Of course, no player is a sure thing.   T

Yeah, I think the semi-consensus on Jones is based on how he’s looked at the plate this season - not just numbers, but how his swing has looked.   It’s more a perception that he has stepped up a notch than that anyone else has stepped back.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

So how much overslot would you be willing to go for Jones?

Zero. He's going to turn down 8.8 million to go to college for three years to, at best, go #1 again? I'm not going to be insulting and offer 7m, but going overslot would be silly 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, seak05 said:

Zero. He's going to turn down 8.8 million to go to college for three years to, at best, go #1 again? I'm not going to be insulting and offer 7m, but going overslot would be silly 

Agreed.   Pay him $100 more than Tork got so he can say he broke the record.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's not about saving money to spend later. Maybe it's about taking who they like best and if they can leverage that into savings to use later, so be it.  From what I read Jones is #1 but it's not a Harper or Strasburg situation where there was a big gap between 1 and the rest.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the gap is getting wider, but I think the point SG is pushing is that after 4 years of building the franchise it is time to take a swing for the fences.  So for me, Jones or Green would fit that bill even though I definitely prefer Jones today.  

This would appear to be the year to take a HS kid over a college bat.  Jones has a tremendous pedigree and Green has flashed tremendous tools and upside.

I am excited to see how it plays out.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, foxfield said:

I think the gap is getting wider, but I think the point SG is pushing is that after 4 years of building the franchise it is time to take a swing for the fences.  So for me, Jones or Green would fit that bill even though I definitely prefer Jones today.  

This would appear to be the year to take a HS kid over a college bat.  Jones has a tremendous pedigree and Green has flashed tremendous tools and upside.

I am excited to see how it plays out.

 

It’s also the point that traditionally, spending less to get overslot players (or at least overslot that you normally couldn’t sign) isn’t really worth it.  Take your best player.  Elite talent is what wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best player doesn't always equal most talented. That's been shown time and time again.  

I like Druw Jones. No problem if he's the pick. I'm not jumping off a cliff if he isn't the pick because if he isn't the pick it's because some don't think he's the slam dunk best player in this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baseball America had a mock draft 3.0 on April 28.  They had a "scout" alternating picks with the writer.  It appeared as if it were their choices as opposed to guessing who each team would take. The scout took Brooks Lee first and then the writer took Jones.  

Again, Jones sounds great but I don't think he's a slam dunk for everyone in baseball circles.

The scout said Lee is a step slow at SS but always seems to be in the right place, suggesting that maybe he sticks at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Baseball America had a mock draft 3.0 on April 28.  They had a "scout" alternating picks with the writer.  It appeared as if it were their choices as opposed to guessing who each team would take. The scout took Brooks Lee first and then the writer took Jones.  

Again, Jones sounds great but I don't think he's a slam dunk for everyone in baseball circles.

The scout said Lee is a step slow at SS but always seems to be in the right place, suggesting that maybe he sticks at SS.

I think a pick of Lee would be viewed as an 'under-slot' pick.  That might not actually be true, but, personally, that's how I would view it. 

At least one mock I've seen with Lee instead of Jones going to Baltimore at 1.1 has been framed within the perceived Elias/Baltimore under-slot strategy.  On the flip-side, there's no telling how many of those mocking Jones @ 1.1 are 'going chalk' either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, btdart20 said:

I think a pick of Lee would be viewed as an 'under-slot' pick.  That might not actually be true, but, personally, that's how I would view it. 

At least one mock I've seen with Lee instead of Jones going to Baltimore at 1.1 has been framed within the perceived Elias/Baltimore under-slot strategy.  On the flip-side, there's no telling how many of those mocking Jones @ 1.1 are 'going chalk' either.

If you pay him near slot and more than Jones gets at #2 I don't see how anyone could rightfully view it as an under slot pick.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It takes Orioles rookies 60 or 70 at bats to get their first two hits.
    • Tell me how can Harbaugh help him when he doesn't know how to help himself. Harbs is the worst at burning timeouts stupidly then not having any when they are needed at crunch time. 
    • Yes the same here. They are going to the playoffs and yet I have no feeling towards it whatsoever. Weird feeling. Like you just know they are going to get bounced in the first round. It looks inevitable. I mean you could make a case the Tigers are more deserving of the Orioles spot. They are playing some great baseball of late. 
    • Man Baltimore sports has not been kind. The Orioles are on a  3 month tailspin and the Ravens did what they do best and blew another double digit 4th quarter lead to a inferior team.  Let's see if the Orioles can right the ship,  though I'm not holding my breath on that one at all. Yikes. 
    • Idk how impactful this was, probably pretty low on the list of problems, but this is the 2nd straight week that Lamar threw the ball late in the game and the receiver was unable to get oob.  The ball to Bateman is probably excusable because we had more time on the clock and we needed the deep ball to be in position to make a run, but this time throwing a 12 yard dump to Andrews was just straight up stupid IMO.  I get that they're going to play outside leverage all day every day in this situation but just throw it away and try to take another shot.  Lamar has to have more clock awareness than that,  and Harbaugh has to instill in him the importance of saving those seconds on the clock.
    • Sorry but that response from Fuller sounds to me like too many words, concepts, abstractions, and if that's how he communicates, wordy and convoluted, it's a lot for hitters to carry "into the box." Not to mention all the specifics involved, re. what pitches and locations to look for, all the analytics of how to do the swing and torque the body, etc. I'm no coach but I can imagine a whole season of this approach just becomes information overload. Maybe it's not rocket science, after all (with all due respect to ex-NASA Sig). Maybe the antidote is more Zen: just see the pitch and hit the dang thing.  BTW I think the analytical, overthinking approach is better suited to the pitching side, where you can plan your attack based on all the data. Hitting is more reaction, no time to think. You can't beat pitching using the same approach--rather, need the opposite approach, to counter with instinct and intuition. At least, that's my cheap (2 cents) advice!
    • The proposition that every auction automatically results in an overpay is simplified indeed.  Granted, "kind of true" is a low bar to clear, but still...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...