Jump to content

Keegan Akin is giving me an Arthur Rhodes vibe!


JimGinSP

Recommended Posts

I know, SSS, but Keegan Akin has really found success in this multi inning stopper role.  Reminds me of the success fellow lefty Arthur Rhodes had after the O’s converted him from frustrating starter to reliever.  Rhodes really was an important piece for Davey’s clubs although the change was made by Mgr. Phil Regan & PC Mike Flanagan mid season 1995.   Rhodes BB/9 and HR/9 really turned downward in 1996 just like Akin’s has this year.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been nothing short of incredible. I keep waiting for the other shoe to drop, and he keeps pitching like he's having an out-of-body experience on the mound. Auto-pilot. It's amazing to watch.

This was a guy I actively trashed on the board, and I'm having a lot of fun eating crow for however long it lasts. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oriole said:

I wonder if he could be back in the rotation at some point? 

I wouldn't mess with him, especially with Rodriquez on the way soon.

Frankly once that occurs the rotation might be...decent?  Lyles, Bradish, Rodriguez, Wells, Zimmermann...who would you move for Akin right now?  I'd leave him right where he is.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Good analogy.   I have to say, Akin has been nothing short of amazing in this role.  12 outings, each at least two innings, and he’s only yielded runs in two of them.  He’s been extremely valuable.

I was going to throw in a third lefty from the past but when I checked out Pete Richert in BBRef I saw he was actually quite a good starter for the Senators prior to his trade to the O’s.   I was just a lad living in NJ at that time rooting for a team which will remain unnamed but remembered Richert.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Snutchy said:

He was filthy last night. The Yankees had no clue what to do with him. He was playing a different game than everyone else. 

Yeah.  I think someone else mentioned that was a weird inning.  3 3-pitch strikeouts...and then a 4-pitch walk and a 5-pitch walk.  But yeah, they were clueless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was hitting 95 almost regularly and I think he got it up to 96.  Has he ever thrown that hard?  Last night they made a comment of him hiding the ball a la Fernando Valenzuela.   I have to imagine that short arm action is incredibly hard to pick up and if he pumping 95-96 that’s a challenge for hitters to handle.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was very close to writing Akin off completely. I thought he did just enough at the end of last year to still have some potential. Even his second half wasn't that great. Would be curious to hear if there are any theories on what he has improved. His velocity is maybe a tick higher. Big number that jumps out is HR/9 going down from 1.6 to 0.3. BB/9 down and K/9 slightly up. Just looks like he has better command overall and that's making all the difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oriole said:

I wonder if he could be back in the rotation at some point? 

Hasn't he spoken about enjoying the role in the pen? I don't move him back to the rotation unless he wants that and if that's the case, I let him try and earn a spot in spring. But having a guy like him in the pen allows you to do an opener if you need a fill-in starter some games as he can give you bulk. 

I'd love to see him keep it up and be that multi-innings guy in the pen that allows you to spot start an opener here and there if injuries/double-headers dictate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Keep Akin where he's at.  He's been dominant.  It's likely he's found his niche.  He'll likely go back to being mediocre to bad if he's converted back to a starter.

Yeah when you see Akin dominate like he has it's tempting to think about putting him in the starting rotation. But he's having success for the first time in his career and it's best to not mess with it. 

The Orioles bullpen has been a mess the past few years and it's turning a corner this season. Putting Akin back into the starting rotation has the potential to hurt the bullpen and the starting rotation so just let him be. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...