Jump to content

"Old" guys are dominating baseball this season


tinman

Recommended Posts

I use the word "old" in quotation marks. 30 is young in real life. In baseball it's considered the end of youth and the beggining of decline. Hell, in recent years I've heard that 28 starts the decline. Well, it sure ain't looking that way in baseball this season. 27 has long been considered the season a hitter will break out and produce a monster season. And maybe that is the case as a general rule. But looking at history suggests otherwise. Do great hitters really fall off a cliff after 27? From I've seen they do not. It's become en vogue to avoid handing out contracts to players over 30.

 

The idea that early 30s is "post peak" seems odd to me. Plenty of players have had their peaks in their early 30s. In fact, among great hitters early 30s seems to be not the beginning of the decline phase, but rather the absolute zenith for many if not the majority of great hitters. Rod Carew, Willie Mays, Miguel Cabrera, Pete Rose, Albert Pujols, Joe Morgan, Ichiro Suzuki, etc. All of these guys didn't just stave off decline in their early 30s, they put the throttle down and had their peak career seasons. 

 

Look at the current top 10 in OPS

1. Trout (30)

2. Judge (30)

3. Machado (29)

4. Ramirez (29)

5. Martinez (34)

6.Goldschmidt (34)

7. Devers (25)

8. Cron (32)

9. Harper (29)

10. Betts (29)

 

Interesting as there is only one player under the age of 29 in the MLB top 10. Is this really the season of the "old" guy? Or are we just returning to a more normal environment?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are talking about the general population of players not the top few when we are talking about aging curves.

You list a group of Hall of Famers as examples of guys that were good past 30.  Well sure, that's why they are HoF players.  I was just talking about Jason Heyward.  If his peak had extended until 32, instead of 25, he'd be a hall candidate.  If Andruw Jones' peak had last into his 30's he'd be in the hall.  If Markakis' power number hadn't dried up after hitting 25 he'd be a hall candidate.

It isn't surprising that former MVPs like Trout, Harper, Betts and Judge are doing well.

That being said I'd take Soto over all of them.

Interesting current top 10 list.  I hadn't realized it was currently skewing that strongly toward the older players.  I don't think it will be as extreme at the end of the season.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

We are talking about the general population of players not the top few when we are talking about aging curves.

You list a group of Hall of Famers as examples of guys that were good past 30.  Well sure, that's why they are HoF players.  I was just talking about Jason Heyward.  If his peak had extended until 32, instead of 25, he'd be a hall candidate.  If Andruw Jones' peak had last into his 30's he'd be in the hall.  If Markakis' power number hadn't dried up after hitting 25 he'd be a hall candidate.

It isn't surprising that former MVPs like Trout, Harper, Betts and Judge are doing well.

That being said I'd take Soto over all of them.

Interesting current top 10 list.  I hadn't realized it was currently skewing that strongly toward the older players.  I don't think it will be as extreme at the end of the season.

 

Interesting. Also, the best players tend to have the best seasons as well. So it's not abnormal for the league to be dominated by superstars in their early 30s. You did point out some guys who fizzled out after posting strong early career seasons. 

 

My point was it's not like these guys were maintaining their level of play into their early 30s. They actually hit the throttle down and were better than ever. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tinman said:

 

Interesting. Also, the best players tend to have the best seasons as well. So it's not abnormal for the league to be dominated by superstars in their early 30s. You did point out some guys who fizzled out after posting strong early career seasons. 

 

My point was it's not like these guys were maintaining their level of play into their early 30s. They actually hit the throttle down and were better than ever. 

Yep, it can happen.

Look at how unusual Cruz's career arc has been.

I'm cautious by nature, I'd rather not bet on a guy being an exception.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yep, it can happen.

Look at how unusual Cruz's career arc has been.

I'm cautious by nature, I'd rather not bet on a guy being an exception.

I'm really curious about how Judge's next contract goes. Good as he is I cannot see that being a contract that works out in the long term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tinman said:

 

Interesting. Also, the best players tend to have the best seasons as well. So it's not abnormal for the league to be dominated by superstars in their early 30s. You did point out some guys who fizzled out after posting strong early career seasons. 

 

My point was it's not like these guys were maintaining their level of play into their early 30s. They actually hit the throttle down and were better than ever. 

I sometimes think we -- and maybe GMs as well -- get too invested in relying on the "normal" arc of a career as a player ages. There's some question about when players "normally" peak.  

https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/9933/how-do-baseball-players-age-investigating-the-age-27-theory/ 

https://eutawstreetreport.com/age-27-baseball-myth/

And even once you've decided what you think normal peak age is, there are some players whose performance deviates from it. I expect that teams have ways to slice and dice that among, for example, power hitters, guys who rely on speed, high-velocity pitchers, guys who've avoided serious injuries, etc. It's one of those areas where I hope the Orioles have a lot more information than we do.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most the younger guys are swingers and very aggressive so there OPS is pulled down because of lower OBP.  The veteran guys have learned the strike zone and will take a walk.  As you age you usually get more patient in baseball and life.   I also think older veteran guys might stay in big better shape and come prepared more then younger guys to spring training but as the season goes along they might wear down faster then a younger player.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year after the season I looked at WAR for position players. Don’t recall if I did top 50 or so per league. It was dominated by players under 30. Most obviously with their original team. 
 

It wasn’t surprising just reinforced what I thought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, eddie83 said:

In NL 

17 -in top 50 were age 30 and up

12 -in top 40

5 -in top 23

How does this rank for overall percentage of players?  I imagine that the league is probably only 30% over 30.  Now many of those 24-26 AAAA guys will never end up as real big leaguers but they make up a strong part of the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's definitely some old pitchers dominating:

Verlander (39): 8 starts, 1.22 ERA, 156 ERA+

Wainwright (40): 8 starts, 2.87 ERA, 133 ERA+

Scherzer: (37): 8 starts, 2.54 ERA, 153 ERA+

Rich Hill: (41): 8 starts, 3.86 ERA, 106 ERA+

Romo: (39): 8 games, 1.13 ERA, 340 ERA+ 

 

And down in the Mexican League, 49 year old Bartolo Colon is reportedly still hoping for a chance to pitch in the majors this year. He went 6-2 with a 4.55 ERA last season at 48.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Total 2022 rWAR, non-pitchers, by age (number at each age):

21: 2.4 (3)

22: 1.2 (11)

23: 5.9 (24)

24: 9.5 (26)

25: 19.2 (57)

26: 6.3 (50)

27: 25.4 (77)

28: 17.6 (55)

29: 23.2 (57)

30: 15.9 (42)

31: 9.3 (43)

32: 15.1 (37)

33: 3.2 (21)

34: 5.4 (13)

35: -0.2 (10)

36: 1.6 (4)

37: -0.5 (3)

38: -0.6 (5)

39: -0.7 (3)

40: 0.0 (0)

41: -0.2 (1)

42: 0.2 (1)

That looks typical to me.  Players are peaking around 27 as always.  The total value of all non-pitchers over the age of 34 is below replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MarCakes21 said:

How does this rank for overall percentage of players?  I imagine that the league is probably only 30% over 30.  Now many of those 24-26 AAAA guys will never end up as real big leaguers but they make up a strong part of the league.

This is interesting from last year.
AL by OPS in 2021

25 and under .727

26-30 .732

31-35 .730

36 and up .731

PA’s by age 

25 and under  19,521

26-30      50,583

31-35       17,721

36 and up  3,298

 

so ages 26-30 had more PA’s then all other ages combined by roughly 10,000 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...