Jump to content

Some Os players will miss the Toronto series


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

This is bull****.   I'm assuming most every team that travels to Toronto won't be at full strength?  

Whatever.

Oh, and...

CITO SUCKS

Yep, it's been going on all season.   Twins put 4 guys on the restricted list last week, OF Max Kepler and 3 relievers.   White Sox starter Dylan Cease didn't make a recent trip, but they knew in advance so they juggled their rotation so he wouldn't have started anyway, and then they put him on the list and were able to get an extra pitcher for the series so you could argue they actually had the advantage there.   One really odd situation was Seattle starter Robbie Ray, who went on the list and didn't make the trip to Toronto in May.  He actually pitched FOR the Blue Jays in 2021 and won the Cy Young.   The only assumption one can make is that last year he met the qualification of having been vaccinated, but he did not get the booster that came out last fall, which was added to the requirement by Canada this year.  Boston P Tanner Houck didn't make a trip. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Thanks, Tony.   I will be interested to see who we need to replace.   It certainly is a competitive advantage for Toronto.  

SG inquired whether Stowers will be called up, if Santander is on the list.  I doubt it. He’s not on the 40 and I don’t think we’d put him there to staff a 4-man series.  I’d guess we’ll get by with McKenna and Mancini.
 

That's the most likely scenario I agree. Still, Elias could surprise. Stowers is not young and looks to be pretty close.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Yep, it's been going on all season.   Twins put 4 guys on the restricted list last week, OF Max Kepler and 3 relievers.   White Sox starter Dylan Cease didn't make a recent trip, but they knew in advance so they juggled their rotation so he wouldn't have started anyway, and then they put him on the list and were able to get an extra pitcher for the series so you could argue they actually had the advantage there.   One really odd situation was Seattle starter Robbie Ray, who went on the list and didn't make the trip to Toronto in May.  He actually pitched FOR the Blue Jays in 2021 and won the Cy Young.   The only assumption one can make is that last year he met the qualification of having been vaccinated, but he did not get the booster that came out last fall, which was added to the requirement by Canada this year.  Boston P Tanner Houck didn't make a trip. 

Looks like in 2021 they made an exemption for non vaccinated  players. 2022 had to be vaccinated. So maybe Ray never left the hotel and stadium. 

Immigration Minister Marco Mendicino said unvaccinated players and staff will not be permitted to go anywhere but the hotel and stadium and will have no interaction with the general public. There will also be a designated compliance officer for each team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

Looks like in 2021 they made an exemption for non vaccinated  players. 2022 had to be vaccinated. So maybe Ray never left the hotel and stadium. 

Immigration Minister Marco Mendicino said unvaccinated players and staff will not be permitted to go anywhere but the hotel and stadium and will have no interaction with the general public. There will also be a designated compliance officer for each team.

Wait, I thought they would not let them in the country? Honestly, this makes a lot more sense than denying them access to the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

This is bull****.   I'm assuming most every team that travels to Toronto won't be at full strength?

Toronto is 18-10 at home, 15-13 on the road.   So, perhaps it’s helping them, or perhaps it’s a coincidence.  Not a huge sample.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Toronto is 18-10 at home, 15-13 on the road.   So, perhaps it’s helping them, or perhaps it’s a coincidence.  Not a huge sample.   

Don't most teams usually have a better home then away record in general ?  Orioles are .500 at home and nine games under on the road. Last year only two teams had a better road then home record,Braves and Brewers. Four teams had identical home and away records. Yankees,Indians, A's and Cardinals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

Don't most teams usually have a better home then away record in general ?  Orioles are .500 at home and nine games under on the road. Last year only two teams had a better road then home record,Braves and Brewers. Four teams had identical home and away records. Yankees,Indians, A's and Cardinals. 

You sort of answered your own question.  So far this year, teams have a .515 winning % at home, .485 on the road.  The Jays have a considerably better H/R split than that, .643 at home and .536 on the road.  But it would be impossible to say whether the roster restrictions on their opponents are the reason.  Every year there are teams that have larger than average H/R splits in their W-L record, and this sample just isn’t very big.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a bunch of silver linings.

Since guys who don't get vaccinated aren't paid for games they miss, the owner might save a few dollars. (Depends on who they are.)

The general manager doesn't much care who wins the games in Toronto, and he may get the chance to look at a few more AAA/AAAA players who get added for Canada Ball.

The Orioles and their fans -- with a few exception -- don't have to worry about the possibility that the less-than-complete Orioles will lose a bunch of games in TOR, then miss the playoffs by a game or two. 

Eh?

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think McKenna will get Santander’s ABs and we’ll add Martin. Martin will then replace Owings as the Util guy as the new norm. We have to add Martin anyways. Adding Stowers would mean having to clear two 40 man roster spots. We don’t have a world beater 40 man, but it’s always nice to have flexibility.

 

I don’t think Stowers is up until Mancini and/or Santander is traded. Plus, taking away 40 man flexibility now might limit us to what we could get back in trade packages and waiver claims. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Any jerk wad want to congratulate Duke Basketball or the Steelers? just go ahead and piss me off even more 
    • Agreed, they were trying to preserve Burnes there. The division still hadn't been clinched, so try to win the game but within the rest management plan for your ace. Hopefully the fact they used Cano means there aren't any major concerns about his rest, but now you have to wonder.
    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...