Jump to content

Keegan Akin hurt?


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

Hyde said today that Tyler Wells is going to be limited due to throwing 95 pitches in his last start. I guess if that was known it makes sense to save Akin to piggyback Wells tonight, although we've seen Akin be less effective pitching on extended rest.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moshagge3 said:

Hyde said today that Tyler Wells is going to be limited due to throwing 95 pitches in his last start. I guess if that was known it makes sense to save Akin to piggyback Wells tonight, although we've seen Akin be less effective pitching on extended rest.

Akin could easily have pitched in the bullpen game and still been available to back up Wells. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moshagge3 said:

Hyde said today that Tyler Wells is going to be limited due to throwing 95 pitches in his last start. I guess if that was known it makes sense to save Akin to piggyback Wells tonight, although we've seen Akin be less effective pitching on extended rest.

Aaaaand it's Krehbiel. What on earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He’s been so valuable where he is.   I’d just leave him there.  

I can see this perspective but we realistically aren’t competing for a playoff spot this season. No harm in trying him in the rotation and moving him back to a bulk reliever role if it doesn’t work out. 

He’s already only pitching once every five days as it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

3.1 IP. That’s about what we’re asking from Voth and Watkins. Could Akin be given another shot at starting again soon?

Why mess with anything? They are all having success in their current roles. Even if we feel a little better about Akin he is still producing value in his current role. I am just glad he is healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

I can see this perspective but we realistically aren’t competing for a playoff spot this season. No harm in trying him in the rotation and moving him back to a bulk reliever role if it doesn’t work out. 

He’s already only pitching once every five days as it is. 

Once every four games, really.  19 out of 75.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Once every four games, really.  19 out of 75.   

Fair enough but whether he is throwing three innings every four games or four to five innings every five games, roughly the same amount of innings will be eaten. 

We need viable starters badly while we seem to be overflowing with quality relievers.  There is no harm in giving him another shot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until/unless roster rules change, I think baseball fans are in the early stages of digesting that except for genuine Cy Young candidates (sorry, John Means), to guys like Elias-Blood-Stearns-Neander (and almost all the other 30 GM's Elias characterizes as flat), traditional SP and RP roles barely exist.    For me its part of what makes Max Scherzer raging against the dying of the light such good baseball theater.    Boy do I wish we could get pre-surgery Bedard back today (please please let DL Hall be that), and am I curious to see if Grayson ever gets Jordan Lyles' workload.    Everyone in the game knows what Jordan Lyles on the 2022 Orioles is, even Jordan Lyles.

Late 2023 I'm setting my hopes on 50 pitch chunks of Means the same as Akin and Hall.

Tinkering with the game I'd probably prefer to outlaw Pitcher 12 and Pitcher 13 from the roster before I'd outlaw the shift.

The first four innings of the game are often a low leverage time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Fair enough but whether he is throwing three innings every four games or four to five innings every five games, roughly the same amount of innings will be eaten. 

We need viable starters badly while we seem to be overflowing with quality relievers.  There is no harm in giving him another shot. 

The risk is that he doesn't perform well as a starter and loses confidence in his stuff. Akin has always performed better the first time through a line-up than the second (as a starter .858 OPS 1st time; .927 OPS 2nd time / as a reliever .561 1st time; .692 2nd time), so maybe he's just right in the two- to three-inning role. It's such a dramatic turnaround this year that I wouldn't dare tinker with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, InsideCoroner said:

The risk is that he doesn't perform well as a starter and loses confidence in his stuff. Akin has always performed better the first time through a line-up than the second (as a starter .858 OPS 1st time; .927 OPS 2nd time / as a reliever .561 1st time; .692 2nd time), so maybe he's just right in the two- to three-inning role. It's such a dramatic turnaround this year that I wouldn't dare tinker with it.

I’ve got mixed feelings about it, but I’m not too worried about shattering Akin’s confidence.   He’s seen that he can perform well in this role.   His mindset has been different this year right from day one and it would be interesting to see how that would play for him as a starter.   But, I do think he’s been very valuable in this role so I’m hesitant to change it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...