Jump to content

Szymborski: The Orioles aren’t good…but they are interesting


Frobby

Recommended Posts

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/the-orioles-arent-good-but-they-are-interesting/

The article summarizes a bunch of prospects and young major leaguers who have improved their long-term ZiPS projections via their play so far this year.

“Of the top 15 O’s prospects in our preseason rankings, only a single player, Kyle Bradish, has seen his career WAR projection go down in ZiPS. That’s progress.”

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Betcha he didn't think they were interesting 2 months ago. 

 

Well, he is a Baltimore area native.  But clearly they are more interesting than two months ago.  That’s kind of the point of the article.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/the-orioles-arent-good-but-they-are-interesting/

The article summarizes a bunch of prospects and young major leaguers who have improved their long-term ZiPS projections via their play so far this year.

“Of the top 15 O’s prospects in our preseason rankings, only a single player, Kyle Bradish, has seen his career WAR projection go down in ZiPS. That’s progress.”

Ok... I'll say it...  They're knocking on the door of "good".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people have been bemoaning the state of our prospect development this year.  The article says 14 out of 15 of our top prospects, including Grayson btw, have improved their career ZiPS projections this season.  I'd say that's a hell of a year for the farm.

Not to mention, what has been going on at the ML level.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Some people have been bemoaning the state of our prospect development this year.  The article says 14 out of 15 of our top prospects, including Grayson btw, have improved their career ZiPS projections this season.  I'd say that's a hell of a year for the farm.

Not to mention, what has been going on at the ML level.

I was bemoaning it BEFORE this year, not so much during.   Also, most of my bemoanifying was pointed at pitching development, and while this year has seen some major steps forward, I still have concerns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw it mentioned somewhere that 16 of our top 17 prospects (per the MLB Pipeline list, I think) are at Bowie or higher now.   That’s a lot of talent coming all at once.   You have to think we’ll be making some trades, both to fill some pitching needs and perhaps restock the lower levels of the system a bit.   Of course, the 2022 draft, where we have a ton of high picks, should help with restocking the system too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

I was bemoaning it BEFORE this year, not so much during.   Also, most of my bemoanifying was pointed at pitching development, and while this year has seen some major steps forward, I still have concerns.

I wasn't really trying to call anybody out specifically, least of all you.

The mood seemed to darken after Grasyon got injured imo.  And it was way darker than the reality.

Personally, I'm thrilled.  The ML team is way better than I thought it would be.  And if you'd told me they were doing this without Grayson or Means I wouldn't have believed it.

And the MiLs, while not perfect, seems to be going very well.  Basically, all of our important prospects, with the exception of Cowser, and Grayson due to a non-arm injury, have held serve or better in their development, and many more have done better than merely tread water.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, owknows said:

Ok... I'll say it...  They're knocking on the door of "good".

The right development and additions to the team and they should contend for a playoff birth next year.

Which is funny because I was told that I shouldn’t expect that but I have been saying that is what 2023 should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still hopeful in late September it all gets on to the field a week or two for closing arguments to every available player in the 2022-23 offseason, including champions who already have set for life money that to me means more dogpile opportunities are a big thing to care about*.

Grayson, Hall, Gunnar, Westburg.    Games 153-156 at Fenway and 160-162 here against Vlad with playoff implications.

*unless you are Kris Bryant needing to counteract painful earnings suppression

Can we just get these Gausman quotes stickied for the duration of his Blue Jays contract?

https://www.thescore.com/mlb/news/2374326

Let's hold the AL East to one playoff berth!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The right development and additions to the team and they should contend for a playoff birth next year.

Which is funny because I was told that I shouldn’t expect that but I have been saying that is what 2023 should be.

Then what were you complaining about?

All people fundamentally disagreed with you about was that trading for Paul DeJong was going to speed the process up.

What was going to speed the process up was having developmental breakthroughs with multiple players.

Well, that's what they've done.

We should all be thrilled.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
    • I agree I missed the mark on a correct forum, and ask a moderator to please relocate to Rants as that game annoyed me yesterday. I appreciate the strong moderators here and know I'm not one of them.     Sorry for making it worse at a tough moment.    I won't bump it again, even ironically if we kick their butts in the playoffs.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...