Jump to content

Mancini trade market heating up? Orioles willing to deal Santander? Yankees and Mets?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, oriole said:

It was already going to be a PR hit moving Trey even if they’re bottom dwellers just because he’s a fan favorite. Imagine how fans would react if he was traded AND they’re a few games from a wild card spot. 
 

I think it’d have to be a pretty good trade and I have a hard time believing Trey has any more value to anyone else than he would to the Orioles, assuming they don’t start losing a lot between now and the trade deadline. 

Giving into the fans is among the many reasons why we’ve been bad for so long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in next two weeks you go to Trey and offer 2/24 or 3/36 team option offer and see what he says.  If he takes it then you move Santander and bring up Stowers.  You have two guys you can move and really only have to move one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Who cares about the PR stuff.  That will get muted by all the young kids coming up and the team continuing to be exciting.

PR isn’t why you keep him.

Exactly! Wouldn’t you rather have Stowers, Henderson, Westburg and Mayo use the DH spot to rest/rotate along with Mountcastle and others. Roster flexibility!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

There is no way Mancini is getting anywhere near that long a contract or that much money on the open market.  In his wildest dreams, Mancini is probably looking at something like the 3/$37.5 mm that Trumbo got.   

And let's not forget that was a terrible overpay for Trumbo, not only due to his lack of production but also the lost flexibility from having the DH spot locked in for three years. It just doesn't make strategic sense to be locking up OF/DH when that is the strength of our pipeline, plus you want the flexibility of the DH spot in case any of our prospects go the Mountcastle route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Who cares about the PR stuff.  That will get muted by all the young kids coming up and the team continuing to be exciting.

PR isn’t why you keep him.

I agree with you in the sense that it was always going to be a hard sell to fans to trade Mancini. But to trade away a productive fan favorite in the middle of a hypothetical chase for the playoffs after a long stretch of losing years is a totally different thing.

I still think it’s good to trade him unless they’re solidly in the chas. If they’re just a couple games out from the wild card at the deadline then it seems like a self defeating move. And there is absolutely no certainty that any of the young guys can match Mancini's production. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

And let's not forget that was a terrible overpay for Trumbo, not only due to his lack of production but also the lost flexibility from having the DH spot locked in for three years. It just doesn't make strategic sense to be locking up OF/DH when that is the strength of our pipeline, plus you want the flexibility of the DH spot in case any of our prospects go the Mountcastle route.

Well, we could have lived with the lack of flexibility if Trumbo had been healthy and performed well.  The irony here is that we had Trumbo’s replacement coming up through our minor league system — Mancini.   But the team has made the playoffs and was reluctant to take the chance that Mancini could ably fill Trumbo’s shoes.   We’re now in that exact situation with Mancini as the proven veteran and Stowers ready to come up.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 7/10/2022 at 12:07 PM, oriole said:

I agree with you in the sense that it was always going to be a hard sell to fans to trade Mancini. But to trade away a productive fan favorite in the middle of a hypothetical chase for the playoffs after a long stretch of losing years is a totally different thing.

I still think it’s good to trade him unless they’re solidly in the chas. If they’re just a couple games out from the wild card at the deadline then it seems like a self defeating move. And there is absolutely no certainty that any of the young guys can match Mancini's production. 

The O's can't even draw 10k fans on a lot of weekdays.  How many fans are there.  You know what will draw more fans--winning!  Adley needs a couple of days a week at DH, plus DH at bats are needed to rest our OF.  I just don't see a spot for Mancini. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:


Mancini & Lopez 

 

For 

 

Ramirez, Allan, Dominiquez, and Suarez

I think Hamel is a great return for a half season of Mancini. I'm not sure we match up well when we include Lopez. Not a huge fan of their other pitching prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2022 at 7:54 AM, Chaka Garcia said:

Exactly! Wouldn’t you rather have Stowers, Henderson, Westburg and Mayo use the DH spot to rest/rotate along with Mountcastle and others. Roster flexibility!!!

I thought we were going to use them as trade bait to booster our minor league system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, UMDTerrapins said:

I think Hamel is a great return for a half season of Mancini. I'm not sure we match up well when we include Lopez. Not a huge fan of their other pitching prospects. 

Why ? I chose Allan over Hamel because you get the better ranked player but he’s about a year removed from TJ. I’d Do the same deal with Hamel. Lopez probably brings back 2-3 good pieces on his own. I went Ramirez, Dominquez, and Suarez mostly because they fit the A level player stuff to help stock the lower levels. Looking to see if they have anyone that you could slot in higher didn’t happen. They need pitching and their minor league cupboard is bare. They might overpay depending on what else is out there 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...