Jump to content

Mancini trade market heating up? Orioles willing to deal Santander? Yankees and Mets?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Camden_yardbird said:

I think the last team to have three position players come up and immediately solve their problems and thrust a team into contention was Jeter, Williams, Posada.

I still can't believe these three will immediately be the cureall to everything.

I understand Henderson is likely to be the top rated prospect in the minors come mid season rankings, but even guys like Kyle Tucker took time and seasoning.

I still think the Orioles should be in the market for long term middle infield help if they can.

If even one of them proves a strong solution to a glaring weakness, that will make a significant impact.  And no, I don’t expect anyone to walk on water from the moment they arrive.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

Mancini is .2 better in career OPS. Benintendi has been worth 14.3 WAR vs 9.5 WAR. Trey offers more pop but less speed and fielding. Sure it’s pick your poison I suppose. But, I think I’d prefer Benintendi if I were trading for a player.

 

18 hours ago, Roll Tide said:
22 hours ago, Frobby said:

Depends what you’re looking for.   Benintendi is probably the better all around player, Mancini is the better bat, especially if you’re looking for some power.   I doubt teams looking at Mancini plan to use him primarily as an outfielder.   

Mancini is .2 better in career OPS. Benintendi has been worth 14.3 WAR vs 9.5 WAR. Trey offers more pop but less speed and fielding. Sure it’s pick your poison I suppose. But, I think I’d prefer Benintendi if I were trading for a player.

Looking a little closer at the numbers, Mancini is clearly the better option from an offensive perspective.  First, Mancini loses a lot of WAR because of his outfield defense and positional adjustment from his innings at 1B and DH, but that is really more of an issue for free agency dollars rather than the trade value of a rental bat.  That is,  if a team needs a bat, but not an every day corner outfielder, the positional value is going to be much less of a concern since teams need to fill all 9 positions.  Second, Mancini's numbers are vastly superior over the last four years, despite the fact that Mancini was coming off of chemotherapy last year.  Since 2019, Benintendi has produced 7 rBAT (avg. of 2 rBAT per 650 PAs), and in 1517 PAs has OPS'd .760, OPS+'d 103, and hit 33 HR.  In comparison, Mancini has produced 41 rBAT (avg. of 17 rBAT per 650 PAs), and in 1591 PAs has OPS'd .821, OPS+'d 121, and hit 63 HR.  This year, Benintendi's power is really down with just 16 total extra base hits (and just 3 HR) .  In addition, Benintendi's base running has not been great recently, as he has 9 SB and 11 CS and an rBASER of -3 over the last two years.  Obviously, his poor base stealing is negatively impacting his rBASER rating, so that number can likely be improved just from not attempting to steal.  But for comparison, Mancini is only -2 rBASER over the last two years, so, from a WAR standpoint, Trey has been the better overall baserunner during that period.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, jdwilde1 said:

 

Looking a little closer at the numbers, Mancini is clearly the better option from an offensive perspective.  First, Mancini loses a lot of WAR because of his outfield defense and positional adjustment from his innings at 1B and DH, but that is really more of an issue for free agency dollars rather than the trade value of a rental bat.  That is,  if a team needs a bat, but not an every day corner outfielder, the positional value is going to be much less of a concern since teams need to fill all 9 positions.  Second, Mancini's numbers are vastly superior over the last four years, despite the fact that Mancini was coming off of chemotherapy last year.  Since 2019, Benintendi has produced 7 rBAT (avg. of 2 rBAT per 650 PAs), and in 1517 PAs has OPS'd .760, OPS+'d 103, and hit 33 HR.  In comparison, Mancini has produced 41 rBAT (avg. of 17 rBAT per 650 PAs), and in 1591 PAs has OPS'd .821, OPS+'d 121, and hit 63 HR.  This year, Benintendi's power is really down with just 16 total extra base hits (and just 3 HR) .  In addition, Benintendi's base running has not been great recently, as he has 9 SB and 11 CS and an rBASER of -3 over the last two years.  Obviously, his poor base stealing is negatively impacting his rBASER rating, so that number can likely be improved just from not attempting to steal.  But for comparison, Mancini is only -2 rBASER over the last two years, so, from a WAR standpoint, Trey has been the better overall baserunner during that period.

Lately??? Benintendi has been worth 4.2 war since the beginning of 2021 and Mancini  has been worth 2.3. If you go back to 2019 Trea has a big season so that yanks things. But, it’s not lately. Trea missed the all of 2020 and Benintendi only had 50abs and didn’t handle the shutdown well based on his numbers.

Also Benintendi is a good defensive outfielder. He obviously lost a step after 2019 and probably should’ve stopped trying to steal. But he’s like 1-2 this season. So he’s really not running. Those numbers could be hit and run situations 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2022 at 1:59 PM, Camden_yardbird said:

I think the last team to have three position players come up and immediately solve their problems and thrust a team into contention was Jeter, Williams, Posada.

I still can't believe these three will immediately be the cureall to everything.

I understand Henderson is likely to be the top rated prospect in the minors come mid season rankings, but even guys like Kyle Tucker took time and seasoning.

I still think the Orioles should be in the market for long term middle infield help if they can.

They don’t need to be all stars.  The would just need to be better than Odor, Mateo and Nevin/Urias to have a significant overall impact on this team.  I think the odds of the youngsters being better than that group is pretty good.  The current bottom three in our lineup are flat out bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...