Jump to content

Mancini trade market heating up? Orioles willing to deal Santander? Yankees and Mets?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't don't like Buck.

I just think that's he's overrated.

At the end of the days the O's finished under 500 with Buck as a manager and his last significant decision as an Oriole's manager cost the O's a chance at advancing in the playoffs.

I most certainly think Buck was involved with bringing Rasmus on.  Just like I think he was involved with the Davis signing and giving Tillman that insane ML deal instead of the minor league contract his performance the previous deal dictated.

Buck brings a lot of good, and bad, to the party.

That said, any team that gets Mancini will be getting a good hitter and a terrific clubhouse presence.   If Buck pushes for him, good for Buck in this instance.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, scbalt52 said:

Pepiot and Knack both are intriguing, to me.

Pepiot, Knack, and Beeter, are really intriguing arms. 2/3 of those would help relieve the sting of losing Santander from the 2023 lineup as RF/DH. Stowers and Nottingham could replace Santander and Mancini. With Nottingham playing C when AR DHs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Pepiot, Knack, and Beeter, are really intriguing arms. 2/3 of those would help relieve the sting of losing Santander from the 2023 lineup as RF/DH. Stowers and Nottingham could replace Santander and Mancini. With Nottingham playing C when AR DHs. 

Santander and Tate for Miguel Vargas, Pepiot, and Knack. Sign me up!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Dodgers are the type of team that we could get SP from since they only target TOR SP. Their #3-#5 SP types would be just fine for us and our depth. 

I know we say take the best package available, but with our system, and going bat again with the #1 pick, we should target SP in trades. 
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Santander has the value you guys think he does. .5 fWAR in 76 games this year is 1.1 fWAR pace over 162 games. He's put up 1.6fWAR over he last 3 years spanning 223 games. His LD% is down, his IFFB% has almost doubled, His Hard% is down and his Soft% is up, so the .249 babip isn't even really getting unlucky, it's just from bad contact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

I don't think Santander has the value you guys think he does. .5 fWAR in 76 games this year is 1.1 fWAR pace over 162 games. He's put up 1.6fWAR over he last 3 years spanning 223 games. His LD% is down, his IFFB% has almost doubled, His Hard% is down and his Soft% is up, so the .249 babip isn't even really getting unlucky, it's just from bad contact. 

Yeah I don't think he has much value, but the 2nd year of control is at least something. And I think Elias knows he's not going to be worth his arbitration cost next year, so he's going to trade him as long as he gets anything of note for him (one pitcher + one 17 yr old lottery ticket perhaps). Whether that's this year or in the offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...