Jump to content

My 2022 Midseason Report Card


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ohfan67 said:

To put that in perspective, if Ryan keeps this up, and that’s a significant if, a 127 OPS+ would be better than all but one of Nick Markakis’ seasons. 

But Nick provided more value on defense.  I think one reason a Mountcastle doesn’t get more attention (though he gets plenty IMO) is that he plays a position where good offense is expected.   His wOBA ranks 14th among 28 qualified 1B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Frobby said:

But Nick provided more value on defense.  I think one reason a Mountcastle doesn’t get more attention (though he gets plenty IMO) is that he plays a position where good offense is expected.   His wOBA ranks 14th among 28 qualified 1B.

Totally agree about defense. Although it’s typically offense bringing attention to defense rather than the other way around (although definitely happens). 
 

I don’t think his rank among other 1B strongly affects how Orioles fans perceive performance within the team. I think Mancini is an example of positional ranking not affecting fan perception (even before cancer). 
 

Mountcastle is far from a perfect player, but he’s one of the few hitters on the roster with the potential to carry this offense for a couple of months IMO.  And do it in more than one year.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/9/2022 at 3:48 PM, Frobby said:

There are a couple of different sources, but the one most easy to access is Fangraphs.   Here a link to their list of defensive stats for 54 catchers, 200 innings caught minimum (look at the column labeled "FRM").    They have him dead last in framing runs, at -9.5   Adley is 14th, at +2.5, despite not having caught that many games yet.  On a per-game basis he is pretty spectacular. 

Baseball Prospectus has its own framing metric.  They have Chirinos at -10.0, Rutschman at +1.7. 

Now let me just say, when I watch Chirinos, I don't notice that he is a particularly bad framer.   But the stats say otherwise.   

I don't know of publicly available sources that track this at the minor league level.

Wow, cubs catcher is so low! How reliable do you feel this data is? Some catchers get more calls bc of success of team? I need to read more how it’s calculated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frobby, you seem awfully harsh on Adley.  His defense and handling of pitchers has been spectacular imo.  It's like night and day vs. recent O's catchers.  I know that Adley didn't hit at all when he first came up, but over the last 30 days, he has a .880 OPS.  Someone also recently calculated that he is putting up a 5.0 on a yearly basis now.  I believe Weiters only reached 5.0 WAR once.  I would have to give him at least a B for what he has contributed defensively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/11/2022 at 12:17 AM, OriolesMagic83 said:

Frobby, you seem awfully harsh on Adley.  His defense and handling of pitchers has been spectacular imo.  It's like night and day vs. recent O's catchers.  I know that Adley didn't hit at all when he first came up, but over the last 30 days, he has a .880 OPS.  Someone also recently calculated that he is putting up a 5.0 on a yearly basis now.  I believe Weiters only reached 5.0 WAR once.  I would have to give him at least a B for what he has contributed defensively. 

Whoever said he was at 5.0 on a yearly basis is very bad at math.  0.8 rWAR, 0.8 fWAR in 41 games = 3.2 WAR in a full season.  

Just remember, I’m grading on a curve based on my expectations for the player.  I expected his defense to be what it is.   I expected him to hit considerably better than .674 OPS.  And, he will.   But he hadn’t done it during the period for which I was grading him.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Hi Puck- From a marketing standpoint the Orioles will eventually reach a relative saturation point which I agree is around 2.5m then it's about leveraging money from the fan experience-winning being a chief component of that.   
    • I doubt it.   wavetrapper joined about 10 days before OOO was banned.   He might have some similar views but seems better at claiming some unique expertise or superiority.   
    • Yes, it's possible.   But we don't know the extent to which the "old school" stuff is still taught.   I wouldn't assume it is ignored or underemphasized.   But, perhaps it is.   Nobody was asking that question last year or the first 2.5 months of this season, though.   I doubt the approach was any different when we were playing .650 ball than it is now.
    • Sports Guy- Isn't attendance becoming more of a  legacy statistic similar to Avg v. OPS?  It's a very different era than 1965 when there were few suites or "premium" seating and hardly any amenities beyond a beer and hot dog.  Today a seat and it's attachment rate are not comparable between say NY and KC-and we've seen the leverage of corporate sponsorship with TRP.  In the Warehouse I would think growing attachment rate and corporate partners would at some point have comparable priority as a revenue driver.  Seat sales account only ~20% of revenue and shrinking,  The revenue tilt is upgrading fans/corps. to a premium seat at an average of 4X the price.   Although this slide is from '22 it details the discrepancy between teams that can leverage premium seating and suites.  Playoff revenue is also likely in this slide which benefits teams like Houston. There is no real way I have found to judge revenue other than Forbes-just food for thought.  
    • The Mountcastle injury hasn't felt like a huge deal since we have a similarly-performing O'Hearn to slot into the same position.  But I think the lineup misses him. He is better than Eloy, Rivera, and the other guys his ABs are getting distributed to. And better defensively than O'Hearn.
    • There could be some interesting stuff to talk about here, or individual cases where what you're saying is true, but I think the short answer is no. Analytics are going to be more accurate overall than the old-school axioms-- the axioms that are provably true are probably still coached.   On point 1 we definitely have some players struggling to make adjustments and some of that may be that they're coached to hunt barrels at the expense of contact. The O's are built to maximize power and you can see that in their results (1st in SLG but 9th in AVG). Maybe a different approach could help some guys break out of a slump more easily, but it's hard to know because there are always struggling players no matter the coaching approach. Were the the Showalter O's missing old-school wisdom when they let Adam Jones continue whiffing on low and away sliders?  Point 2 I probably buy the least because pitching analytics across MLB have been so generally effective in helping players maximize their game. Probably there are ways the O's could be using their data better. Not every decision and result will be perfect. But analytics is golden for pitchers.  On point 3, is there any reason to think the O's are generally weak on defensive fundamentals compared to most teams? Gunnar had his recent error binge but that's all I can think of and that seemed more like a personal thing to me. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...