Jump to content

Is it Sustainable?


Yossarian

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

Urias had a miserable April but he has been solid ever since. Currently just under his career norm OPS and headed in the right direction. No reason to think he can't continue to OPS .750. I think Westburg would almost certainly be better than Mateo but I'm not sure Vavra will be better than Urias.

You have to factor in Mateo's defensive prowess and the possibility that Westburg will need as much time to adapt as some even more highly rated prospects have this season and last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jcaponio said:

Curious as to why Vavra isn’t ready now but will be in a week?

Its just my guess.   Elias IMO likes to get about 200 PA at a level for a prospect that is spending his first year at that level.     Vavra is at 181 PA at AAA.  So another 19 PA and he will have reached that level.   

The other thing that has to happen is that there has to be need in the majors for Vavra and there seems to be.   Nevin or Arauz can be sent to AAA and Vavra can share time at 2B with Odor.   Of course Vavra's OBP is very desirable if it translates to the Majors.   However,  there are questions above his arm strength and ability to turn the double play.

Stowers has reached the 200 PA level a few weeks ago but there is no opening  in the outfield or at DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Urias had a miserable April but he has been solid ever since. Currently just under his career norm OPS and headed in the right direction. No reason to think he can't continue to OPS .750. I think Westburg would almost certainly be better than Mateo but I'm not sure Vavra will be better than Urias.

But, will he be better than Odor.  Play Urias at 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will soon find out how sustainable our run this year is.  We start to play real good teams including from the AL East.  I think it could be sustainable because no 1 or 2 players are carrying the team, but most all are playing  good, so maybe they will not all slump at the same time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, wildcard said:

Can they sustain winning every game? No.   Can they win 85?  I think so.

Hall and Harvey are both ready. Harvey was not supported by the kind of catching pen, and defense that the team has now.  I look for the coaches to help Bradish get some movement on his fastball.  That makes the starting 8 deep.   I think the pen can continue to do well especially with the starters going deeper.

If the O's keep playing well I could see Westburg, Gunnar and Vavra  joining the team in the 2nd half.  Stowers is ready now and Vavra will be ready in about a week.  

I think there is a good chance this is a playoff team if Elias doesn't sell off key player(s) at the deadline.

It is horrifying to me that you view a guy who hasn't even been close to "league average" since 2016 as a viable reinforcement. Harvey is toast and was only ever here to be an innings eater for the second season in a row. Not a guy expected to provide any positive value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

It is horrifying to me that you view a guy who hasn't even been close to "league average" since 2016 as a viable reinforcement. Harvey is toast and was only ever here to be an innings eater for the second season in a row. Not a guy expected to provide any positive value.

Pretty silly thing to be horrified over.  Hope you have more going on in your life that it does not impact you too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FlipTheBird said:

It is horrifying to me that you view a guy who hasn't even been close to "league average" since 2016 as a viable reinforcement. Harvey is toast and was only ever here to be an innings eater for the second season in a row. Not a guy expected to provide any positive value.

Not a big fan of Harvey but he pitched better than his ERA said last year.  He can come up, give you some innings and keep you in most games.  Not going to be a great pitcher by any stretch but he can be good enough to provide you value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...