Jump to content

What do you want to see with picks 33, 42, 67


Recommended Posts

Just now, Sports Guy said:

I was about to post the same thing.  Just saw that BA’s second best available is an OFer from Oregon St

If he bats left-handed he's going to be the most likely selection. lol 

Never can have too many outfielders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the Jackson Holliday pick, but really dislike the 2 picks afterward. Realize teams shouldn't draft for need, but there were several highly rated pitchers available that the Os passed on. This draft (as well as last year's draft) makes no sense. Teams also need to pitch to be successful despite what Sig's analytics say

Edited by cnmilton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cnmilton said:

I like the Jackson Holliday pick, but really dislike the 2 picks afterward. Realize teams shouldn't draft for need, but there were several highly rated pitchers available that the Os passed on. This draft (as well as last year's draft) makes no sense. Teams also need to pitch to be successful despite what Signs analytics say

I sincerely doubt Sigs analytics say that you do not need to pitch to be successful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Big Mac said:

I sincerely doubt Sigs analytics say that you do not need to pitch to be successful. 

This is the equivalent of an NFL team refusing to draft QB's because of the failure rate. Sure, you can draft them later in the draft, but the chances of finding a franchise qb are very difficult or next to impossible. Plus, teams that have TOR starting pitching or franchise QB aren't really looking to trade that asset, so your team is stuck with 2nd tier (at best) alternatives

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cnmilton said:

This is the equivalent of an NFL team refusing to draft QB's because of the failure rate. Sure, you can draft them later in the draft, but the chances of finding a franchise qb are very difficult or next to impossible. Plus, teams that have TOR starting pitching or franchise QB aren't really looking to trade that asset, so your team is stuck with 2nd tier (at best) alternatives

It is not at all the equivalent.  TOR starting pitching is traded frequently.  Drafting pitching is also much more volatile than even quarterbacks in the NFL.  It's a complete apples to oranges comparison.  You can find contenders littered with starting pitching they didn't draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was cool seeing Eric Davis looking well.

At this point the big fish dance is mostly just Porter-Whisenhunt, right?    We'll see if TBR cut a deal for one of them, they are at the end of the 2nd before our Comp pick acquired from Miami.

I guess now is when the real fruit of the Sulser-Scott sell off comes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Big Mac said:

It is not at all the equivalent.  TOR starting pitching is traded frequently.  Drafting pitching is also much more volatile than even quarterbacks in the NFL.  It's a complete apples to oranges comparison.  You can find contenders littered with starting pitching they didn't draft. 

Elias is following the Astros model where they went and acquired high priced veteran pitchers to fill out the starting rotation.

The one thing I question with this strategy being carried out on the Orioles is ownership’s appetite to increase payroll.

Sure top of the rotation pitchers are available in trade or free agency, but if Elias is working on a limited budget it decreases from the available pool of talent he can target. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, they’re good.  I mean, they’re good enough. And what they really are, is boring.  Outside of Bobby Witt Jr., there’s nothing exciting about that team.  They signed a bunch of boring free agents like Lugo and Wacha, guys that we sneered at because they don’t have “elite” stuff.  And all Lugo and Wacha did were turn in boringly great seasons.     I’m sure their fans aren’t blowing each other over and over again about how great their farm system is and filling out make believe lineups on fielding 1-9 100% home grown talent.    They rely on pitching and defense.  Shouldn’t be a foreign concept to Orioles fans that remember the good old days, but it seems like it is.  No, the Royals are good. They’re just boring. No superstars outside of Witt, Salvy and maybe Ragans. They play in a boring city and a boring ballpark in front of boring fans.  Their farm system is boring.    Meanwhile we’re over here saying how great we should be because of Jackson Holliday and Coby Mayo and Heston Kjerstad and Adley Rutschman and Gunnar Henderson and all this youth and talent that’s going to have us winning all the time and life is going to be so great.  Can’t be bothered to sign guys like Lugo and Wacha, those guys aren’t elite enough for our amazing window of talent!   We’re like the definition of being born on third base and thinking we’ve hit a triple. 
    • They're not good.  No sour grapes or me being a bitter Betty, the Royals aren't a good baseball team.   As disappointing as last year was at least TEX was a talented team on a heater. I'm happy whenever the Yankees lose but I kind of want them to sweep KC, not that I really have much against the Royals, I just want our guys to truly understand what apitiful performance that was. 
    • I can't speak for others obviously, but I have a lot of concern over the hitting approach. This approach is unpleasant to watch and has been pretty much all year. Cowser striking out with the bases loaded and 1 out on a pitch that breaks his hand because it is so inside is the perfect symbol for everything that is wrong with what we do. He was swinging no matter where that pitch was going. But I am more concerned that there is simply nothing at all special about anyone we have in place in the organization....whether it be the GM, analytics gurus, managers, coaching staff, or players.  They just look like an ordinary organization and ordinary team to me that isn't any better at what they do than anyone else. And sadly, when the stakes are high and the pressure ramps up, we are worse than anyone else.  42-48 in their last 90 is pretty telling, especially when they looked their best sweeping 3 in a row to end the regular season in the only 100% meaningless games played in that stretch.  They are enjoyable to watch, when the pressure is totally off. At least we still have playoff baseball to watch. I'll try not to cry or be too jealous when I watch the Brewers and Padres and see what a young Jackson is supposed to look like as opposed to the one we have.
    • Yeah I don't want to hear it.  He and Hyde have been saying he's healthy, now some vague comments.  You sucked. Own it, take a long look in the mirror and figure out why, and come back next year. 
    • Awwww! Gunnar was crying! Adley was trying to hold back tears! They’re such a tight knit group! They all realize that Burnes and Tony probably won’t be back! My heart is breaking!!!!!!!   💔💔💔💔😭😭😭😭😭😭
    • from Roch …..The aftermath          https://www.masnsports.com/blog/orioles-try-to-come-to-grips-with-another-playoff-sweep-and-pending-losses-within-clubhouse
    • It’s early morning and I am still steaming mad.   it’s like we have 9 Mark Belangers hitting for us, all of whom cannot play defense anywhere near what Mark did for us.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...