Jump to content

Adley Rutschman’s “First Half”


Frobby

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, interloper said:

🙃

Relative rookie years here are not close.  Per WAA, Bobby Witt turns your otherwise .500 team into a .496 team.

Adley Rutschman turns your otherwise .500 team into a .529 team.

Over the course of 162 games that 5.3 more wins.

Yes, both players should get better and Witt is younger, but the apparent need for Witt to move to the right on the defensive spectrum has ill portent for the Royals.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Some people (one!) preferred Witt over Rutschman.   When Witt was tearing up AAA we heard about it.   Now, not so much.

Witt is on pace for a 3.5+ WAR season and he just turned 22.  He has  109 wRC+.  

When Adley was 22, he didn’t play because of COVID.   At age 23, he was in the minors the whole year, albeit that’s the Orioles fault for making a  there.

That said, being down on Witts season right now is the height of stupidity.  If he was an Oriole, we would all be ecstatic with where he is and how he comps to Adley and other young stars.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Orioles4Life21 said:

Next thing I’d like to see from Adley is some success vs lefties. He’s over .900 Ops against righties but .500 against lefties. Which is interesting considering last year in the minors he was over 1.000 against lefties and in the .800s I believe against righties 

His exit velocity is in the 58th percentile I believe I saw.  He needs to start hitting the ball harder and driving it with more consistent but I agree that the lefty thing is the biggest thing right now.

That said, he has been excellent so far and is only going to get better.  He’s already the best player on the team, by a wide margin imo.

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Witt is on pace for a 3.5+ WAR season and he just turned 22.

When Adley was 22, he didn’t play because of COVID.   At age 23, he was in the minors the whole year, albeit that’s the Orioles fault for making a  there.

That said, being down on Witts season right now is the height of stupidity.  If he was an Oriole, we would all be ecstatic with where he is and how he comps to Adley and other young stars.

I think the Orioles made the right choice.  Just checking to see if you would still choose Witt if you were in charge.   Guess we know your answer.  LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Witt is on pace for a 3.5+ WAR season and he just turned 22.

When Adley was 22, he didn’t play because of COVID.   At age 23, he was in the minors the whole year, albeit that’s the Orioles fault for making a  there.

That said, being down on Witts season right now is the height of stupidity.  If he was an Oriole, we would all be ecstatic with where he is and how he comps to Adley and other young stars.

Crazy that he has such a huge discrepancy between fWAR and rWAR.  I will say that neither of them have him on pace for a 3.5+ WAR season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Witt is on pace for a 3.5+ WAR season and he just turned 22.  He has  109 wRC+.  

When Adley was 22, he didn’t play because of COVID.   At age 23, he was in the minors the whole year, albeit that’s the Orioles fault for making a  there.

That said, being down on Witts season right now is the height of stupidity.  If he was an Oriole, we would all be ecstatic with where he is and how he comps to Adley and other young stars.

I think it's certainly fair to still prefer Witt going forward.  I think Adley is clearly the better player right now (and as you noted he is two years older).  That being said, if Witt can't stick on the left side of the dirt I would definitely prefer Adley, but it's way too sign to make that decision on Witt defensively IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps this means nothing as it's something that should, in theory, effect every player equally, but it's impressive what Adley is doing in the 2022 run environment. If you showed me his triple slash before the season started, without knowing how low scoring would be, I'd be pretty happy. However, I wonder how much giddier we'd be if his OPS+ was the same but with higher counting numbers, a greater triple slash, etc. due to a more friendly run-scoring environment. 

The correct answer is probably "it shouldn't change your opinion at all," but psychologically, I think it's had some passive effect on our perspective, no matter how high we are on him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Big Mac said:

I think it's certainly fair to still prefer Witt going forward.  I think Adley is clearly the better player right now (and as you noted he is two years older).  That being said, if Witt can't stick on the left side of the dirt I would definitely prefer Adley, but it's way too sign to make that decision on Witt defensively IMO. 

Defense peaks early.

If he's struggling now it is likely to get worse as he ages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...