Jump to content

Punting the Season


oriolefan1035

Recommended Posts

Punting the season?

They traded a guy who for all intents and purposes was a free agent after the season and sold high on a waiver wire player having a career year.  Yes, they didn't add to the roster.

Like or not, this is the Tampa model that people want the Orioles to follow.  There is no asset that is sacred outside of 1-2 key prospects who are willing to sign early extensions, and even then its only while they are cheap. And there is no position in the standings that locks their roster up either.  Tampa churns and churns.  There were reports they were discussing Ji Man Choi with teams a week ago.  He has the third most WAR on that team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, RZNJ said:

You’re right but let’s see if Bryan Baker and Joey Kriehble can take on more high leverage situations and step up to the challenge.  

That's only part of it. To keep it simple, assume that Bautista replaces Lopez, and Kriehble replaces Bautista, with little or no decline in performance. Who replaces Kriehble? At some point, the music stops, and whoever takes the innings that would have been Lopez's is almost certain to be less effective than Lopez. If you try to redistribute those Lopez innings by having your top few bullpen guys each take on just a few more innings, you increase the risk of fatigue, leading to their ineffectiveness or even injury.

No two ways about it. Losing Lopez is a hit to the bullpen and to the 2022 Orioles. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see anyone punting on the season.  Personally I'm excited and think the Orioles are sort of playing with house money right now.  It will be good for them to continue to promote players and have them gain experience in what I hope will be a competitive stretch run.  But I didn't have any of this in the cards for them this year.

Mancini and Lopez were important players but I think they still have the personnel to stay in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Camden_yardbird said:

Punting the season?

They traded a guy who for all intents and purposes was a free agent after the season and sold high on a waiver wire player having a career year.  Yes, they didn't add to the roster.

Like or not, this is the Tampa model that people want the Orioles to follow.  There is no asset that is sacred outside of 1-2 key prospects who are willing to sign early extensions, and even then its only while they are cheap. And there is no position in the standings that locks their roster up either.  Tampa churns and churns.  There were reports they were discussing Ji Man Choi with teams a week ago.  He has the third most WAR on that team.

How do you know that Lopez is having a career year, and not starting a Josh Hader-like run as a very effective relief pitcher? True, he was a waiver acquisition; that doesn't brand him as a replacement-level "waiver wire player" for the rest of his career. The way he came to the Orioles might be relevant in that it shows how unlikely his climb to being a really effective reliever has been. I can't see how it bears on whether he can maintain that level of performance, or something close to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

How do you know that Lopez is having a career year, and not starting a Josh Hader-like run as a very effective relief pitcher? True, he was a waiver acquisition; that doesn't brand him as a replacement-level "waiver wire player" for the rest of his career. The way he came to the Orioles might be relevant in that it shows how unlikely his climb to being a really effective reliever has been. I can't see how it bears on whether he can maintain that level of performance, or something close to it.

First, let's put off here that Lopez is anything near Hader.  Hader was never a waiver pick up.  Hader has sustained his success that was projectable from his minor league numbers. 

I don't know that Lopez will regress, but as I said in my post, this is the Tampa model.  They sell players at their peak when replacements are available.  Hell,  they sell prospects when they are at the top of their system (see Libertore).  It's possible Lopez keeps this level of success in which case the trade was probably a loss.  But getting four players probably means you hit on 1-2.  That's how you keep a stocked farm system.  That's how you create flexibility.  Tampa acquires talent.  Period.  Regardless of need.  

As I have stated in previous posts, look at what they did this year.  The Rays traded for Isaac Paredes because the cost was low.  Paredes plays second base.  Prior to the trade Tampa had Brandon Lowe (also an OF), an all star just signed to an extension.  They also had Taylor Walls, a top 5 (in their system) prospect who can play SS, 3B, and 2B.  But that's not all, "there's more!".  They had vidal Brujan, another top 5 prospect and top 100 MLB with 50 steal speed.  Theyve also had Aranda, and Chang, and Raley.

Point is, they didn't need Paredes but they saw an opportunity. That's the Tampa system that everyone wants to emulate.

Did trading Lopez hurt the Orioles chances this year? Yes.  Does it really matter that their chance at the playoffs dropped a few percentage points? Probably not.

The Orioles were not willing to do what teams ahead of them in the standings did.  The Mariners went and got Castillo, a two year player for them.

The Blue jays went and got Merrifeld who they have for 3 years.

Were you willing to do those things for this year?  Noelvi Marte was a top 20 MLB prospect.  We're you willing to give up westburg or Henderson?

Does trading Lopez hurt the Orioles chances next year?  Maybe but maybe not, but now they armed with 4 prospects to plug those holes.

I wanted to see the Orioles prepare for competion too this year, but the time to do that was really last off season, and they operated as if they were still in rebuild mode.  It looks like that won't be the case again.  The point is, that competitiveness will come from and be maintained by many, many more moves like this, so we better get used to it.  The days of small market teams being able to keep players because they could be part of the next competitive team are over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said it before.  This year is a big step in the overall process.  This is the year the guys learn how to win.  They get confidence in their ability to win ball games.  They learn how to come back from deficits in the late innings.  They learn how to hold leads.  They learn how to hold each other accountable in doing their job.  They learn how to relish in each victory and pick each other up when they fail.  This is very important in building a winning culture.  The culture is changing in Charm City. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

That's only part of it. To keep it simple, assume that Bautista replaces Lopez, and Kriehble replaces Bautista, with little or no decline in performance. Who replaces Kriehble? At some point, the music stops, and whoever takes the innings that would have been Lopez's is almost certain to be less effective than Lopez. If you try to redistribute those Lopez innings by having your top few bullpen guys each take on just a few more innings, you increase the risk of fatigue, leading to their ineffectiveness or even injury.

No two ways about it. Losing Lopez is a hit to the bullpen and to the 2022 Orioles. 

 

Or maybe DL Hall finishes his innings this year in that slot, smokes it and the bullpen is better 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Yeah. I mean analytics obviously is huge in baseball these days. Still people like myself who have been watching the 0's since the early 1960's still are entitled to view and comment on things from the eye and between the ears test.  I don't get upset when people speak about deep stats and numbers... Moose saying opinions are obnoxious because people comment about  things from an old perspective is not only kind of dismissive, it's kind of rude too. We all have opinions.  
    • And think of how many quick offensive possessions we have too. That leads to a tired defense. They ran Henry once in the 4thQ yesterday. They didn’t target Zay after he caught his TD pass. They used 12 personnel less than last week and barely used play action, despite the fact that Crosby was all over them.    No game plan. No thought on how to do anything. Made Henry a priority and then you don’t know how to use him. Just stupidity all around.
    • The Orioles like to try and give this award to someone considered a prospect so McDermott and Povich can't be ruled out despite their partial seasons there. Brandon Young should definitely be in the running though.
    • It's going to be an extremely anticlimactic and somewhat undeserved champagne celebration when the O's eventually clinch what we have to assume will be the wild card. Like, it's hard to imagine a party of any kind right now. They will do it though, and that's fine. It'll just feel weird from the fan perspective. 
    • Here something else to consider. Do the Orioles have a lot of players who have a tendency to hit the ball to the same parts of the field? Seems to me that the other team's advanced scouts do a good job of positioning their fielders against the Orioles more often than not. Now maybe it's just bad luck. Or maybe, teams have figured out how to pitch and defend against the Orioles hitters?  I'm not saying they do or not, but I do know this team has been absolutely pathetic hitting with RISP late;ly and having productive at bats. Seems the Orioles hitting philosophy is hit the ball as hard as possible at all times and let "luck" decide the results.  
    • It's a good thing Irvin only cost the Orioles this guy: I was pretty skeptical of Hernaiz being anything more than a utility guy and had no issues with moving him for a guy who could potentially help in the rotation. This problem with Irvin is he went from this guy in 2023: to this guy in 2024: Don't worry though, we could lose Irvin because we have this guy in AAA who we gave up Norby and Stowers for:  
    • I am "old school" and I don't disagree, but it also doesn't have to be either/or in my opinion. I would substitue the word "tiring" for "obnoxious" above. 😀 I admittedly don't understand all the data and look at some of it in bewilderment. You can teach old dogs new tricks but it takes longer. I'm trying to learn and follow but still hang on to what I know best. (My smart phone ain't real smart either!!!!!) I suspect I may not be alone in the realm of Oriole fandom. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...