Jump to content

8/9: Stowers Big Night


cboemmeljr

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Nice bomb to center. Hopefully he's getting back on track. I worry a bit that he's going to be a streaky hitter like Mountcastle and Hays though.

Actually his previous 2 ABs were impressive too. He walked both times showing patience and not swinging early in the count. He had been overly aggressive early in the count the several weeks.

Maybe this begins a hot streak for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Nice bomb to center. Hopefully he's getting back on track. I worry a bit that he's going to be a streaky hitter like Mountcastle and Hays though.

He's got 7 walks and 7 K's to start the month.  4 walks and no K's in last 3.  Homer to CF and also a line out to CF.  I feel a hot streak.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

He's got 7 walks and 7 K's to start the month.  4 walks and no K's in last 3.  Homer to CF and also a line out to CF.  I feel a hot streak.   Better plate discipline than Mountcastle. Better power than Hays.  Streaky?  Yes, but let's hope he's learning things that will keep the cold streaks shorter.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve often wondered, if you have two players with identical overall stats, one of whom is streakier and the other of whom is steadier, is one any mire valuable than the other?   And then at the team level, is it better to have 9 steady guys, 9 streaky guys, or a mix?   There’s a temptation to say steadier is better, but sometimes a streaky guy can carry an otherwise mediocre offense when he’s hor.  I think @DrungoHazewoodhas said there’s some research saying it doesn’t really matter one way or the other so long as overall production is the same.   But steadier production perhaps is more aesthetically pleasing because ice cold hitters are so frustrating to watch.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’ve often wondered, if you have two players with identical overall stats, one of whom is streakier and the other of whom is steadier, is one any mire valuable than the other?   And then at the team level, is it better to have 9 steady guys, 9 streaky guys, or a mix?   There’s a temptation to say steadier is better, but sometimes a streaky guy can carry an otherwise mediocre offense when he’s hor.  I think @DrungoHazewoodhas said there’s some research saying it doesn’t really matter one way or the other so long as overall production is the same.   But steadier production perhaps is more aesthetically pleasing because ice cold hitters are so frustrating to watch.  

I don't think I've ever seen any good studies on the topic, probably because of a few things:

1) I don't think players are as streaky or consistent as might be commonly perceived.  Eddie Murray was Steady Eddie and he had a month where he OPS'd .490 and a month where he OPS'd 1.301. In April of '81 Eddie went 5-for-37 with a .364 OPS, in September of '81 he had a 1.105. This is a guy whose nickname was consistency.

2) There are problems defining streakiness.  Is it month-to-month? Weeks? Days? 

3) Streakiness isn't predictive.  No matter the results of the last day/week/month the odds are a career .250 is going to go 1-for-4 today.

4) Because of #3 you can't leverage it.  You'll often hear that so-and-so needs to play today because he's hot. But that's not really a thing, you can't just play someone when he's hot and bench him when he's cold.  Everyone has supposedly hot and and cold streaks but you never know when it's going to flip, you always end up playing the guy a week into the cold streak and bench him when he's probably about to have better results. Also, if you model hot and cold streaks with random PA-to-PA variation around career marks the results are essentially indistinguishable from what you see in real life.  Practically speaking hot and cold streaks are random.

5) Some of what's perceived as streakiness is actually injury.

6) I think bad players are more consistent than good players.  In 2009 Cesar Izturis had an OPS between .584 and .685 every month he had more than 10 PAs. That same year Nick Markakis had monthly OPSes between .642 and 1.020.

If you're talking year-to-year you'd rather have the guy who has some 8-win seasons and some 1-win seasons rather than someone who just has 3-win seasons all the time.  Because 8-win seasons are the kind of thing that can push a team over the top and you can build and trade and push in specific years.  But in-season streakiness isn't like that, you can't leverage it.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I thought Stowers was the Luke Scott type streaky hitter?  I guess now he’s just dominant. 

Not this year.  By month: .899, .849, .910, .891, 1.191.   He did have a cold spell of maybe two or three weeks sometime in the first two months, not really anything unusually bad for any player during the course of a season.  He’s really had a nice, consistent season IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • With a previous post in this thread I highlighted a selection of notable or memorable comps for our current Orioles. Now I wonder what it would look like to compare our best roster (from that selected list, in order of WAR) with the corresponding squad of not-all-stars.   Without further ado, here's our team alongside its historic counterparts: LF    Norby        Eugenio Suarez CF    Mullins        Kevin Kiermaier RF    Cowser        Ken Singleton 1B    Mayo        Bill Melton 2B    Holliday    Arky Vaughan SS    Ortiz        Jose Pagan 3B    Henderson    Bill Madlock C    Ruthschman    Ted Simmons DH    Westburg    Robby Thompson     Bench    Mateo        Greg Gagne     SP1    Bradish        Justin Verlander SP2    Kremer        Johnny Cueto SP3    Rodriguez    Jose Berrios SP4    Povich        Jarrod Washburn     SP5    Irvin        Scott McGregor RP1    Pham        Jeff Samardzija RP2    McDermott    Steve Renko RP3    Vespi        Graeme Lloyd RP4    Baker        Matt Albers Closer    Bautista    Trevor Hoffman Oddly enough, it's the starting rotation that appears the strength of our team of doppelgangers.
    • Regarding Cooper, he was a fantastic pitching coach for a long time, but the game simply passed him by.  Near the end of his tenure, after a tough season Giolito actually went and worked with Ethan Katz (our current pitching coach and his former HS pitching coach) and he came back new and improved.  Katz also got a ton of credit for developing Cease and getting Rodon to finally tap into his potential. A year ago I would have been high on Katz, but last year was such a disaster that I’m not sure what to think.  It’s clear he’s got a much more modern take on pitching than Cooper, but I also think the org in general is so behind the times when it comes analytics & biometrics that there is only so much he can do.  We don’t have a single voice driving an org wide pitching philosophy (which is evident in our PD system) or much of a pitching lab to get the most out of guys.  Hopefully that will change for the better with the addition of Brian Bannister. All that being said, I don’t believe for a second we get all we can out of our guys.  Katz obviously helped Giolito, Cease, & Rodon improve but these were all elite prospects acquired from other orgs.  We still struggle to unlock the next tier of guys, although I blame that on broader organizational issues than purely Katz.
    • I love this.  Most fans that go to the game live within 45 minutes of the ballpark I would suspect.  The good thing is you can get home by 10:00 most evenings.  
    • I selfishly don't like it, I'm a displaced fan in the central time zone.  5:30 weeknight start times are rough for me, the games are usually over before I get home from the office.  But they should make decisions based on the people who might actually go to the games. 
    • That's something that can only be determined in hindsight.  Lots of options and lots of flexibility this offseason to really set the team up for the next 2-3 years.  I'm very curious to see how it plays out.  Checking my crystal ball, I don't see Aroldis Chapman anywhere on the program
    • I agree and I don't want him on the team.  But I'm not sure this specific moment is more critical than say, when he picked Gunnar Henderson in the second round.
    • Perhaps he looked and doesn’t have the dough to spend or wants to part with the asking price for Cease or 1 year of the other guys rumored available. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...