Jump to content

Why isn’t Stowers here?


ManciniFan

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Pushmonkey said:

Right now he wouldn’t get regular AB with Vavra killing it. 

He could though.  Vavra as your regular second baseman, and Santander, Hays, Mullins, and Stowers in the OF and DH spots on a rolling basis.  Keeps everyone fresh too.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

So, if service time didn’t exist, you think all of these guys would still be in the minors, right?

Henderson for sure would be here if not for service time. Urias would move over to Second. BTW, Urias in his small ample size at 2B is 0.5 DPR which means he's been better than average at turning DPs from second after being a bit at ) DPR last year, which means he doesn't hurt you.

Then the question is, who do you bench for Stowers if Henderson comes up as well? Vavra would make a nice Pinch hitter and he can play the outfield to give him extra PAs resting Hays against good right-handers. Or you rotate 1B/LF/RF/CF/DH between Mountcastle (1B), Santander (RF/1B/DH), Vavra (DH/LF/CF), Hays (LF/RF/CF), Stowers (RF/DH) and Mullins (CF) between these six giving them each a day off every six games.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Henderson for sure would be here if not for service time. Urias would move over to Second. BTW, Urias in his small ample size at 2B is 0.5 DPR which means he's been better than average at turning DPs from second after being a bit at ) DPR last year, which means he doesn't hurt you.

Then the question is, who do you bench for Stowers if Henderson comes up as well? Vavra would make a nice Pinch hitter and he can play the outfield to give him extra PAs resting Hays against good right-handers. Or you rotate 1B/LF/RF/CF/DH between Mountcastle (1B), Santander (RF/1B/DH), Vavra (DH/LF/CF), Hays (LF/RF/CF), Stowers (RF/DH) and Mullins (CF) between these six giving them each a day off every six games.

You rotate.  None of those guys are hitting so well that you can’t rotate guys in and out of the lineup.  Stowers doesn’t have to play every single day.  If he plays 4 or 5 times a week, that is enough.

Guys are also hurt and days off will do them good.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

Stowers will be up with the team for games played in Toronto, right? He can show whether he belongs in the Orioles roster in this game. 

The Mike Elias analytical department will surely weight a couple of games and maybe a dozen PAs appropriately.  Which is to say, not very much at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Remember The Alomar said:

I know Akin and Santander couldn't enter Canada in June, but I'm pretty sure they became eligible when the Orioles last went in July. 

O's have only been to TOR once in June. Next week is the 2nd time they will be up there. Per the team, they are now both vaccinated and are eligible to play in Canada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think really we're just waiting on an injury. For now they seem content to go with who they have and add some elite defense with Phillips, who is now squarely on the bench with Hays back. 

I have to say I might prefer Vavra at DH to Stowers right now. Stowers is going to strike out a TON before he settles in. Vavra has needed virtually no settling in time. And there's not a lot of time left in the season. 

At the very least, Stowers will be on the roster in September. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aglets said:

I have a hunch that this thread will have a different tone by Monday.

To be clear, this is RAMPANT speculation with not even the tiniest sliver of insider info.

But it's a good hunch.

Who do you think comes off the roster if you had to guess? 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

I think really we're just waiting on an injury. For now they seem content to go with who they have and add some elite defense with Phillips, who is now squarely on the bench with Hays back. 

I have to say I might prefer Vavra at DH to Stowers right now. Stowers is going to strike out a TON before he settles in. Vavra has needed virtually no settling in time. And there's not a lot of time left in the season. 

At the very least, Stowers will be on the roster in September. 

Spot on. It’s Vavra over Stowers right now. Getting into the Odor thing is just real deep. 
 

However, when rosters expand in September, I could see us going with Nottingham over Stowers if we’re only allowed to add one more pitcher. Nottingham is RH and allows us to PH for Chirinos. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cano has been great since June 1st even if the last week has been rough. 11.27 K/9, 3.41 ERA, 2.56 FIP, 2.64 xFIP, 2.73 SIERA. Perez’s ERA is worse than last year but his K-BB rate, FIP, and xERA are all better than last year, while his xFIP is slightly worse. I don’t feel notably different about those two this year than heading into the playoffs last year. If anything, having Cano as a 7th/8th inning option instead of the closer like last year is probably better.  The pen isn’t great but I don’t think it’s that bad. Cano, Perez, Soto, Dominguez, Coulombe, Webb, and Akin have combined for a 3.37 ERA and 9.81 K/9 this year with the O’s. They’re missing a go to back end guy (which is evident when pitching to guys like Judge and Soto) but they have a number of solid options that can strike guys out. Guys like Kimbrel, Irvin, Baker, Smith, Tate, Ramirez, and Heasley really hurt the overall bullpen ERA and they won’t be pitching in the playoffs. I’m definitely taking them over KC’s pen and I’m not sure it’s that much worse than any other AL playoff team’s besides Cleveland. 
    • Your conclusions are 100% correct, but it has nothing to do with division records in that 3 way tie It is head to head results among the tied teams: 1) Det 10-9 (4-2 vs Balt, 6-7 vs KC) 2) Balt 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det) 3) KC 9-10 (2-4 vs Balt, 7-6 vs Det)
    • I assumed the OP meant next year.  I don't think there's anyone on the international side who has a chance at this point to blow up that quickly.  I agree that if we're looking beyond just next year then yes, that's more likely.
    • You are wrong. If Detroit wins out and the Orioles are swept (and KC doesn't sweep), we fall to the #2 wild card due to our tiebreak loss to Detroit head to head.  Detroit is the #1 wild card in that case.  We are the #2 wild card.   If KC wins 1 or 2, they are the #3 wild card, otherwise Minnesota is the #3 wild card. If Detroit wins out AND KC wins out and we are swept, it is a 3 way tie for the 3 wild card spots.   Based on head to head among tied teams, we are 3-3 (4-2 vs KC, 2-4 vs Det), KC is 9-10 (2-4 vs us, 7-6 vs Det), and Det is 10-9 (4-2 vs us, 6-7 vs KC).   So Det is the #1, we are the #2, and KC is the #3. So to be the #1 wild card and get home field Tuesday, we need either one win or one Detroit loss.   KC's results are irrelevant to whether we get the #1 spot or not, although they could jump us and Detroit by winning out if we lose out and Det wins out.
    • LOL, I was worried last year about getting swept in four games by the Red Sox when the magic number for the division was 1. Part of being a fan is imagining the worst case scenario. I would agree it's not likely, though.
    • O's just need to win 1. O's lose home field if they go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0. I actually have no idea what happens if the O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0, and Royals go 3-0. They'd all be 88-74. O's have tiebreaker over the Royals, but not over the Tigers. Royals have the tiebreaker over the Tigers, but not the Orioles. lol Does anybody know what happens in that situation? Does it go to intradivision?  If so, here are their records intradivision: Orioles: 32-20 (.615)  in AL East Royals: 33-19 (.634) in AL Central Tigers: 27-22 in AL Central Interestingly enough, that loss against the Yankees now means the Royals have the intradivision tie breaker. So it does look like there are 2 scenarios where the O's don't get home field: O's go 0-3, Tigers go 3-0 OR O's go 0-3 and Tigers go 3-0/Royals go 3-0. If the Tigers lose, doesn't matter what the Royals or O's do.  I think?
    • Skubal holds Slater to a .000 average/.000 OPS. SSS with only 5 AB's, but he's 0-5 with 0 walks and 2k's. DH vs Skubal = Rivera
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...