Jump to content

Tatis Jr. is evidence for not giving megadeals to youngsters


winning

Recommended Posts

Perhaps it is a bad idea to sign young players to massive 14 year type deals worth hundreds of millions. I don't know about you guys, but I remember what it was like to be in my early 20s. I'm 30 years old now. I did a lot of dumb things in my early 20s due to immaturity. Last thing I could handle when I was 22 was a 14 year guaranteed contract worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Most guys at that age simply don't have the maturity stay focused, dedicated and mature with that type of deal. We all saw what a douche Manny was in his younger years and he has since calmed way down and grown up in San Diego. Who is to say that if had signed Manny to a 300 million deal at 22 or 23 that he wouldn't go out there and become an even bigger baby? 

 

Come to think of it, Elias' decision to keep guys down in the minors for a while may actually be a good decision. It's not just about baseball readiness. It is about being prepared to handle yourself like a big leaguer too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from the dermatological qualifications given in the tweet, Rany Jazayerli was a longtime Baseball Prospectus muckety muck when it was stronger back in the 90's and 00's.

https://www.baseballprospectus.com/news/article/148/pitcher-abuse-points-a-new-way-to-measure-pitcher-abuse/

He was one of the architects of their Pitcher Abuse Points a quarter century ago*, documenting workload more systematically and contributing towards today's nuggets like Corbin Burnes physically unable to pitch in October, and Grayson Rodriguez in his peak physical prime maybe being shackled to 125 innings.

*jeez I'm getting old

Edited by Just Regular
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't give large contracts to players like Tatis, you're accepting that they're going to leave at 27 or 28 and you will probably have to trade them prior to that. I mean, that's a reasonable strategy for many teams.

But even with this suspension (which the Padres will not have to pay his salary for the duration of) Tatis is quite likely to earn his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is certainly a risky proposition to sign young players, pre arbitration to long contracts. That does not mean it does not work sometimes, but it's certainly a situation where the GM needs to be sure this is the player you not only build around, but who they think has a good chance of staying healthy.

Obviously the closer a young player gets to free agency the harder it will be buy out those arbitration years in order to get a discount on those free agency years.

It will be interesting to see if Elias goes this route since he may think he pipeline with adequately replace his young players before they become ultra expensive (assuming they become stars.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Obviously the closer a young player gets to free agency the harder it will be buy out those arbitration years in order to get a discount on those free agency years.

It will be interesting to see if Elias goes this route since he may think he pipeline with adequately replace his young players before they become ultra expensive (assuming they become stars.)

I am hoping that Elias will explore such deals with Adley, Gunnar, and Grayson this offseason, I think they are special enough talents to try to lock them up for the long haul (not that I would expect all 3 to bite, but maybe 1 or 2 of the 3).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

I am hoping that Elias will explore such deals with Adley, Gunnar, and Grayson this offseason, I think they are special enough talents to try to lock them up for the long haul (not that I would expect all 3 to bite, but maybe 1 or 2 of the 3).

We'll see. Elias is setting up his organization to have a pipeline of talent. No way will he or should consider Grayson Rodriguez because there is way too much injury risk for pitchers. He's literally on the IL now.

Adley is a pretty special player when he take in the position, leadership, and his skill set. I could see them trying to lock him up for 8 years or so but I'm sure Elias/Sig have some kind of risk analysis program that determines whether it's fiscally smart to do so.

I'm on the fence when it comes to these kind of big deals early in a player's career. As point out by the OP, some may not be mature enough to handle being set for life in their early 20s. Rutschman on the other hand is only an injury risk due to his position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

If you don't give large contracts to players like Tatis, you're accepting that they're going to leave at 27 or 28 and you will probably have to trade them prior to that. I mean, that's a reasonable strategy for many teams.

But even with this suspension (which the Padres will not have to pay his salary for the duration of) Tatis is quite likely to earn his contract.

 

It is unwise to hand the keys to the franchise and give an athlete megamillions in their early 20s. Everybody is differnt, but a lot guys at 22 will go off the rails with a 300 million contract. Their brains simply can't handle it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, winning said:

 

It is unwise to hand the keys to the franchise and give an athlete megamillions in their early 20s. Everybody is differnt, but a lot guys at 22 will go off the rails with a 300 million contract. Their brains simply can't handle it.

Tatis Jr grew up differently than a good portion of pro athletes. There's always a risk, but the team doesn't have to pay for those 80 games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, winning said:

 

It is unwise to hand the keys to the franchise and give an athlete megamillions in their early 20s. Everybody is differnt, but a lot guys at 22 will go off the rails with a 300 million contract. Their brains simply can't handle it.

I think it’s funny you’re talking about wisdom and painting with broad strokes, something a wise person wouldn’t do. 
 

But since we’re propping up one player as a cautionary tale, I’ll prop up Acuna as evidence that you can give someone in their early 20s a lot of money and they can handle it. 
 

Or a lot of NFL and NBA players. 
 

This Tatis thing is a nothingburger. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

We'll see. Elias is setting up his organization to have a pipeline of talent. No way will he or should consider Grayson Rodriguez because there is way too much injury risk for pitchers. He's literally on the IL now.

Adley is a pretty special player when he take in the position, leadership, and his skill set. I could see them trying to lock him up for 8 years or so but I'm sure Elias/Sig have some kind of risk analysis program that determines whether it's fiscally smart to do so.

I'm on the fence when it comes to these kind of big deals early in a player's career. As point out by the OP, some may not be mature enough to handle being set for life in their early 20s. Rutschman on the other hand is only an injury risk due to his position.

While it's true that THEY ALL BREAK, I think Grayson is a special enough case to consider rolling the dice- the Orioles have not produced a legitimate ace since the Bush Sr. presidency 30 years ago, and we are unlikely to be able to ever shop from the top shelf of free agent pitching, which makes him a uniquely precious asset for the organization. It would definitely be a risk, but if we could buy out his 6 years of team control now in exchange for a couple of well-paid but hypothetically team friendly option years, I think that is worth considering (which is also the type of deal I'd offer Gunnar).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, winning said:

 

It is unwise to hand the keys to the franchise and give an athlete megamillions in their early 20s. Everybody is differnt, but a lot guys at 22 will go off the rails with a 300 million contract. Their brains simply can't handle it.

Show me the analysis.  How many young athletes have been given big contracts, how many worked out, how many crashed and burned?  Are there common threads among either case?  Does it differ by sport, or by position?  Right now you're just speculating based on a sample of one.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...