Jump to content

2023 Rotation


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

2-3 times a year he’d pitch a really dominant game and you’d think the light had switched on.  But it was always an illusion. 

He's got to be the worst fundamentals pitcher ever.  He had no control and led the league multiple times in walks, wild pitches, hit by pitch.  As a professional he was 1-for-106 with 97 strikeouts as a batter.  DRS has him as a -34 fielder, while peers like Bedard and Guthrie were positive.

And then there was that interview with Dave Trembley after a few beers where he pretty much straight up said Cabrera was on industrial quantities of steroids.

That was an ugly chapter in the franchise's history.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

Another post you made, from the McKenna thread:

 

@Frobby mentioned Bedard in the thread about Hall. My opinion is that he’s not ready and can’t believe that the Orioles think he is.

Erik Bedard:  before call up ERA 2.79, WHIP 1.03, HR/9 0.5, BB/9  1.9

Hall:                                            ERA 4.52, WHIP 1.43, HR/9 1.2 , BB/ 9 5.2 

**** Stats are from BBref Bedard 2003 combined minors, Hall 2022 combined.*****

===
I think you misconstrued my hypothetical about Bedard.   I was not commenting on whether Hall is as ready as Bedard or not.   I was asking a truly hypothetical question: if you knew a pitcher would need to struggle as a starter for two years against major league hitters in order to adjust and become pretty dominant in year 3, would you install him as a starter even if you knew he’d be hurting your (otherwise contending) team somewhat in the first two years?   So, I’m curious about your answer to that purely hypothetical question.  

Now, as to the comparison between Bedard and Hall, it’s pretty much apples and oranges.  The year before he made the majors, Bedard was recovering from TJ surgery.  The stats you cited above were only over 19.1 IP, and all at A+ or below.   You can’t compare that to Hall’s 2022, where he’s thrown a lot more innings, mostly at AAA.  it was a huge surprise when Bedard made the O’s roster in 2004, having never pitched an inning of AAA and having only thrown 19.1 innings in A+ and below the previous year.   The fact that he made the roster is testament to how weak the O’s pitching was at the time.  In May that year, they also called up Daniel Cabrera, who’d thrown all of 27.1 innings in AA and had never pitched in HiA at all.   That’s just how the team rolled in that era.   Bedard managed to develop into a good major league starter after a couple of years; Cabrera never did.   But Hall’s path to date has been a bit different than either of theirs.   

So, like I said, my gut feeling is that Hall is going to struggle for a year or two as a major league starter.   Will he come out the other side as a successful starting pitcher?  Is he, or the team, better off spending more time starting games in AAA next year?   Will he move to the bullpen instead and find major league success there?   That’s all TBD.  I think the plan to spend the rest of this year in the bullpen makes sense, and we’ll see if he makes the adjustment well enough over the next few weeks to return to the Orioles in that role for September.   And then he’ll come back next spring and probably get some looks as a starter and we can worry about that then.  
 

No ….earn the promotion. Promoting guys before they are ready ( mostly out of desperation) is the old Orioles way from the 90s on. If he progresses in two years in the minors them he may not need 2 years of learning at the big leads. Or maybe you go with the Akin role but why rush him when he’s clearly not ready?

Did the best I could considering the injury but he was dominant before the injury in 2002. Much better than Hall 

I can’t help but believe that Hall was rushed as Elias caved to the whining fans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

No ….earn the promotion. Promoting guys before they are ready ( mostly out of desperation) is the old Orioles way from the 90s on. If he progresses in two years in the minors them he may not need 2 years of learning at the big leads. Or maybe you go with the Akin role but why rush him when he’s clearly not ready?

Did the best I could considering the injury but he was dominant before the injury in 2002. Much better than Hall 

I can’t help but believe that Hall was rushed as Elias caved to the whining fans

There is nothing about Elias' tenure so far that makes me believe he would deviate one bit from his plan in order to cater to the fans.  He is pretty cold blooded in that regard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Big Mac said:

There is nothing about Elias' tenure so far that makes me believe he would deviate one bit from his plan in order to cater to the fans.  He is pretty cold blooded in that regard. 

I thought so …but Hall didn’t help the Orioles last week and won’t before next season at some point. He can’t throw strikes consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I thought so …but Hall didn’t help the Orioles last week and won’t before next season at some point. He can’t throw strikes consistently.

Elias thought maybe they would catch a little lightning in a bottle.. somebody called up, other team has not seen them, occasionally it goes really well.   Hall has thrown games too at AAA where he made hitters look just stupid.

If there was any other message, maybe Elias thought well if he gets clocked then maybe he will focus a bit more on what he needs to do to be successful. 
 

But it didn’t work out, we lost, stuff happens 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tntoriole said:

Elias thought maybe they would catch a little lightning in a bottle.. somebody called up, other team has not seen them, occasionally it goes really well.   Hall has thrown games too at AAA where he made hitters look just stupid.

If there was any other message, maybe Elias thought well if he gets clocked then maybe he will focus a bit more on what he needs to do to be successful. 
 

But it didn’t work out, we lost, stuff happens 

An uneducated guess based on nothing. Yes but recent history said he has control issues, and run issues. He produced exactly what was the stats said were most likely.

Maybe ….but I think , Earn it or you won’t be called up is the proper message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

An uneducated guess based on nothing. Yes but recent history said he has control issues, and run issues. He produced exactly what was the stats said were most likely.

Maybe ….but I think , Earn it or you won’t be called up is the proper message.

But the message is also earn it and we still won't call you up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Right he's blocked by a roster with Odor, Nevin and Phillips on it.  (Combined -.7 rWAR)

The only player that matters is the OF. They aren’t cutting Odor and Nevin is the back up 3B. Besides Nevin and McKenna both have .300+ batting since the break. So they are indeed contributing despite sporadic playing time. 
 

Releasing Phillips would be an admission that Elias got it wrong. I doubt he’s eating $500,000 or whatever is left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

An uneducated guess based on nothing. Yes but recent history said he has control issues, and run issues. He produced exactly what was the stats said were most likely.

Maybe ….but I think , Earn it or you won’t be called up is the proper message.

Elias probably had many reasons we are not privy to.  If we went by your argument “he produced exactly what the stats said was most likely” ., well the stats said we were likely not going to be producing or winning many games this year with this motley bunch too .. not always what happens.  

.  I will trust that ME had his reasons.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

The only player that matters is the OF. They aren’t cutting Odor and Nevin is the back up 3B. Besides Nevin and McKenna both have .300+ batting since the break. So they are indeed contributing despite sporadic playing time. 
 

Releasing Phillips would be an admission that Elias got it wrong. I doubt he’s eating $500,000 or whatever is left.

You don’t need to release anyone for him to get substantial at bats.  You just need to sit players, which they are doing anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...