Jump to content

2023 Rotation


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Obviously, we need to see how the season and winter play out.

1. Wells

2. Kremer

3. Rodriguez 

4. Bradish

5. Voth

6. Watkins

7. Hall

8. Baumann

9. Zimmerman 

This is without Lyles and without the #1 pitcher most people want.

The performance of this pitching staff is making the additional of two veteran pitchers seem unnecessary.   It’s also starting to make Lyles possible rotation spot in jeopardy.  The next question is, how bad do you think that Elias feels he needs to go out and get starters for next year.  

And you have Means coming back at some point AND Povich possibly ready at some point.

 

Lets put some innings to these starters.  Let's say  30 more innings then they pitch this season.

1.  Wells 125 IP

2. Kremer  140 IP

3. Grayson 100 IP

4. Bradish 165 IP

5. Voth  130 IP

6. Watkins -  probably a long reliever/spot starter

7.  Hall -  Huge question mark.  Could be a starter or reliever.  Control issues

8.   Baumann  is starter depth at this point.  Maybe 115 IP

9. Zimmermann  will be 28 year old with a major league career 5.57 ERA.  Maybe he helps but I will not save a rotation spot for him.

10. Means  - 2nd half. Maybe 100 IP.   Could be a trade chip because 2024 is his walk year.

Then there are injuries.  The O's lost Means, Grayson and Wells this year.   Could happen equally as bad next year.

The bottom line here is that Lyles (also a trade chip)  or another established starter is needed. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Is there really that much difference between these two?

Quite a bit of difference.

Baumann will be 27 this month.   Been through the wars and hopefully has matured. 4.20 ERA at AAA.   1.317 WHIP in 60 IP.  Righty. College draftee.

Hall  will be 24 this month.  Still maturing.  Figuring it out.  High ceiling but has not proven he is a starter yet.  We hope he is  but undetermined.   4.70 ERA at AAA.   1.448 WHIP in 76 IP.  Lefty.   High Ks and BBs. High school draftee.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Quite a bit of difference.

Baumann will be 27 this month.   Been through the wars and hopefully has matured. 4.20 ERA at AAA.   1.317 WHIP in 60 IP.  Righty. College draftee.

Hall  will be 24 this month.  Still maturing.  Figuring it out.  High ceiling but has not proven he is a starter yet.  We hope he is  but undetermined.   4.70 ERA at AAA.   1.448 WHIP in 76 IP.  Lefty.   High Ks and BBs. High school draftee.

Nothing here would put one at possibly 115 inning and the other a huge question mark.

Baumann has shown on multiple occasions that he is also a huge question mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

 

11 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Nothing here would put one at possibly 115 inning and the other a huge question mark.

Baumann has shown on multiple occasions that he is also a huge question mark.

You have a point.  

I just think they are coming from difference places.   Baumann pitched 124-130 innings in 2018 and 2019.   He got injured and is coming back.

Hall has never pitched over 95 inning in 2018 at 19 years old.  Still has tons to prove to be a starter.  Love the ceiling though.

But you make a good point.  Both can be considered question marks.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

I will say this…there is no one in the current rotation that I feel overly confident about in terms of being an average or better starter in 2023.

I think they have several guys who could be that and I wouldn’t replace all of them by any means but I will be nervous about all of them no matter how they end the season.  

I don’t feel 100% confident but so many of them pitching well indicates it might be something more sustainable (as opposed to one guy pitching out of his mind a la Matusz).  An earlier post discussed the slider addition for several for instance.

I think there’s enough there plus Rodriguez that they might be able to focus on paying for a top FA and not spending prospects yet. Especially with Means filling in like he’s a free trade deadline addition.

I am interested to see how the rest of the year goes for Degrom and Syndegaard for instance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

I will say this…there is no one in the current rotation that I feel overly confident about in terms of being an average or better starter in 2023.

I think they have several guys who could be that and I wouldn’t replace all of them by any means but I will be nervous about all of them no matter how they end the season.  

I think that’s fair.  It’s not like any of them have long track records of success.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I will say this…there is no one in the current rotation that I feel overly confident about in terms of being an average or better starter in 2023.

I think they have several guys who could be that and I wouldn’t replace all of them by any means but I will be nervous about all of them no matter how they end the season.  

Can't help you with your nervousness but I am not nervous at all.   These pitchers don't stand there on their own.   They are part of a system built and run by Elias/Sig/Holt/Hyde.    And they are not going to stop here.  Their system helps them indentify talent and their development system helps they improve it. 

I have faith in the system and the people running it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to add a minimum of one good starter. I would prefer two. Voth to me is the perfect spot starter/long man. I don’t see how we can go into next year and think Hall is in the rotation at the start. Watkins is odd man out. He can be a spring candidate as depth.  
 

FA

Wells

Kremer 

Grod

Bradish  

 

Really prefer 2 additions  

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 9/2/2022 at 3:56 PM, wildcard said:

Can't help you with your nervousness but I am not nervous at all.   These pitchers don't stand there on their own.   They are part of a system built and run by Elias/Sig/Holt/Hyde.    And they are not going to stop here.  Their system helps them indentify talent and their development system helps they improve it. 

I have faith in the system and the people running it.

I’m optimistic but still uncertain.  Another year of good performance would make me a lot more confident.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I’m optimistic but still uncertain.  Another year of good performance would make me a lot more confident.  

Yep.  Right now, it can’t be treated as anything more than a one off with a lot of these guys.  We need to see more. 
 

It’s one of the biggest decisions of the offseason.  Who do you believe is for real and who isn’t and how much are you willing to bet on these guys in a year where you absolutely should be a real contender?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Fun performance last night, but I hope DL Hall is sent home for the winter with a starting pitcher's preparation plan.

Sure everyone is just an out-getter, but he's someone I hope starts one of the first five games next season.    You can always adjust in-season if he washes out or if by mid-year you want to nurse him to the fall.

Great to see him settling in in any context.

Who is the Opening Day starter as it stands now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Fun performance last night, but I hope DL Hall is sent home for the winter with a starting pitcher's preparation plan.

Sure everyone is just an out-getter, but he's someone I hope starts one of the first five games next season.    You can always adjust in-season if he washes out or if by mid-year you want to nurse him to the fall.

Great to see him settling in in any context.

Who is the Opening Day starter as it stands now?

Best guy in spring training.  Looking like Kremer or Bradish.   I think they should put Wells in the bullpen and have him do Akins job at a masterful level.  I don’t think he is durable for a SP load.  Lyles is gone.  Means is just second half depth.  Voth is depth.  If Spencer Watkins is on the 40 man something went wrong with the off-season.  I think Hall goes to AAA or they give him 100 ip out of the bullpen(my preference). Bauman same as Hall.  The way I see it we have 

Rotation:

1. Grayson 

2. Kremer

3. Bradish 

4. need to acquire

5. Need to acquire

SP depth/bullpen/piggyback types:

1. Voth 

2. Wells

3. Hall

4. Bauman

 

Not sure I’m too interested in anyone else.  We should acquire 2 if not 3 pitchers this off-season.  2 starters and a dominate late inning type.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Best guy in spring training.  Looking like Kremer or Bradish.   I think they should put Wells in the bullpen and have him do Akins job at a masterful level.  I don’t think he is durable for a SP load.  Lyles is gone.  Means is just second half depth.  Voth is depth.  If Spencer Watkins is on the 40 man something went wrong with the off-season.  I think Hall goes to AAA or they give him 100 ip out of the bullpen(my preference). Bauman same as Hall.  The way I see it we have 

Rotation:

1. Grayson 

2. Kremer

3. Bradish 

4. need to acquire

5. Need to acquire

SP depth/bullpen/piggyback types:

1. Voth 

2. Wells

3. Hall

4. Bauman

 

Not sure I’m too interested in anyone else.  We should acquire 2 if not 3 pitchers this off-season.  2 starters and a dominate late inning type.  

 

 

This is the ideal with something like Bassitt/Rodon or equivalent.  That puts the bullpen in a strong place.  If you sign two top tier starters, I actually send Hall back down for a first man up SP role with Baumann.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rotation needs help at the top.  Obviously the O's need someone to soak up innings, but they also need someone to front a rotation for a potential playoff series.  I like Lyles and respect what he did this year, but there's no way I want him starting game 1 in the playoffs.

My personal choice would be Bassitt.  I'm sure there are several starters that would fit what the O's need: dependable, fits in Camden Yards (someone help by Camden wall easier to sign), leader mentor, above average in innings pitched, WHIP, FIP, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...