Jump to content

2023 Rotation


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

Does Hall not remind you of Scott when he was young? I'm not implying that Hall is destined for the fate that Scott has shown, but it does give me some trepidation about trying to guess where he'll end up down the road.

No he doesn’t.  Scott was a reliever, not a starter.  Yea, they are both left handed and throw hard but that’s about the extent of things.

Lots of players have been ranked high and failed.  Lots of players have had great stuff and failed.  Doesn’t mean the next guy will.

Hall is a highly ranked arm that quite frankly has limited pro innings.  
 

Im not overly concerned with him yet. It appears he will make it through this season healthy, which is great to see.  He will be in line to throw 130-160 innings next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

What’s wrong with making him beat up on players of inferior talent? Triple A has other good prospects but also AAAA players. I contend that if he can’t excel there why would we expect him to be better here or think he earned the call up which should be the reason to bring him up.

Let's say you want to get better at cornhole.

Are you more likely to improve playing against inferior competition or superior competition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Hope you’re willing to eat a 20 loss season from Hall if he starts 35. He’s 2-6 in AAA. As of now, Hall is a reliever. I like Hall, but he needs to learn how to get AAA hitters out let alone MLB. As a starter. 

I don’t care about his win loss record. There are things that are out of his control. I care about walks, hits, and ERA. I know his K rate is not likely to be as high at AAA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

What’s wrong with making him beat up on players of inferior talent? Triple A has other good prospects but also AAAA players. I contend that if he can’t excel there why would we expect him to be better here or think he earned the call up which should be the reason to bring him up.

I'm not a huge fan of guys who rate minor league players but as a whole, they tend to generally get things right. This guy is lauded by all as a special talent. 

I think you treat him differently if you believe you can get a better result. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 7Mo said:

I'm not a huge fan of guys who rate minor league players but as a whole, they tend to generally get things right. This guy is lauded by all as a special talent. 

I think you treat him differently if you believe you can get a better result. 

Again …. he’s not proving he is right now. I know he has good stuff but he has to improve or MLB pitchers will destroy him again and again. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Let's say you want to get better at cornhole.

Are you more likely to improve playing against inferior competition or superior competition?

If you can’t beat the inferior talent it’s reasonable to believe that you’ll get beat against superior. In a cornhole league that’s competitive they wouldn’t care about your potential, they’d care about the results in the lower leagues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roll Tide said:

If you can’t beat the inferior talent it’s reasonable to believe that you’ll get beat against superior. In a cornhole league that’s competitive they wouldn’t care about your potential, they’d care about the results in the lower leagues.

You avoided answering my question a couple different ways there but whatever I'm stepping away from these arguments for a few to follow the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Was Scott ever seen as a starting pitcher?

Was Scott lauded for his athleticism?

Did Scott ever have more than two pitches?

Are Scott and Hall both hard throwing left handed pitchers and therefor the same person?

Yes, no and no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roll Tide said:

Again …. he’s not proving he is right now. I know he has good stuff but he has to improve or MLB pitchers will destroy him again and again. 

Well, in his first start he didn't get destroyed. How many hard hit balls did he give up? He's a high energy guy. It was his first major league start. He was amped to the gills. That's likely the worst he will be for a long time. And I think you mean MLB hitters but whatever. How many K's?

He was throwing a fastball down the middle that was running all the way off the plate inside. The number of people who can do that is remarkably small. This guy is a special talent. 

Is he ready? Nope. But that doesn't matter to me. What matters is what this coaching staff believes is the very best way to develop him as a MLB starting pitcher. If they believe that next year he needs to be in the starting rotation and take his lumps, I'm good with it. 

I'm typically a big believer in leaving a guy in the minor leagues until he demands a promotion. But DL Hall ain't just any guy. If you believe you can develop him better, bring the dude up and start him. And live with whatever that development  costs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Was Scott ever seen as a starting pitcher?

Was Scott lauded for his athleticism?

Did Scott ever have more than two pitches?

Are Scott and Hall both hard throwing left handed pitchers and therefor the same person?

He was a starter at one point.

I thought Scott was a well regarded player in the MiL. In his scouting report he was listed as athletic.

 

Yes, the last question you posed was exactly what I wanted to imply.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You avoided answering my question a couple different ways there but whatever I'm stepping away from these arguments for a few to follow the game.

We can agree to disagree. I don’t think you fix control issues and mechanics at the higher level. That’s why we have the minors. I love his potential. I said he wasn’t ready the other night but was wising him the best. I was right … but I’m an idiot that doesn’t know anything (rolls eyes). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Well, in his first start he didn't get destroyed. How many hard hit balls did he give up? He's a high energy guy. It was his first major league start. He was amped to the gills. That's likely the worst he will be for a long time. And I think you mean MLB hitters but whatever. How many K's?

He was throwing a fastball down the middle that was running all the way off the plate inside. The number of people who can do that is remarkably small. This guy is a special talent. 

Is he ready? Nope. But that doesn't matter to me. What matters is what this coaching staff believes is the very best way to develop him as a MLB starting pitcher. If they believe that next year he needs to be in the starting rotation and take his lumps, I'm good with it. 

I'm typically a big believer in leaving a guy in the minor leagues until he demands a promotion. But DL Hall ain't just any guy. If you believe you can develop him better, bring the dude up and start him. And live with whatever that development  costs. 

Noted … let’s see

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

If you can’t beat the inferior talent it’s reasonable to believe that you’ll get beat against superior. In a cornhole league that’s competitive they wouldn’t care about your potential, they’d care about the results in the lower leagues.

Cornhole league.  Lol

WTF?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Cornhole league.  Lol

WTF?!

I believe he was just adding to the hypothetical CoC mentioned. 

This thread has so many tiffs and scuffles, it hurts my head. I'm not sure who had their feathers ruffled by who (whom) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...